The Complexity of Creativity: Les Demoiselles D’Avignon as a Cognitive-Historical Laboratory

REFERENCES

• Arbib, M. A., & Hesse, M. B. (1986). The construction of reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnheim, R. (1962). Guernica: The genesis of a painting. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashton, D. (Ed.). (1972). Picasso on art: A selection of his views. New York, NY: Da Capo.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, M. A. (1991). The creative mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, M. A. (2010). Creativity and art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bois, Y.-A. (2001). Painting as trauma. In C. Green (Ed.), Picasso’s Les Demoiselles d’Avignon pp  31-54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. L. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collingwood, R. G. (1956). The idea of history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousins, J., & Seckel, H. (1994). Chronology of Les Demoiselles d’Avignon, 1907-1939. In W. Rubin, H. Seckel, & J. Cousins (Eds.), Les Demoiselles d’Avignon (pp. 145–205). New York, NY: Museum of Modern Art.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, N. (2000). Cubism. London: Phaidon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowling, E. (2002). Interpreting Matisse Picasso. London: Tate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• D’Andrade, R. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, S. (1994). Creativity in invention and design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, S. (1996). Technology and creativity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, S. (2003). Multidisciplinary creativity: The case of Herbert A. Simon. Cognitive Science, 27, 683–707. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2705_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, S. (2004). Is creativity a Darwinian process? Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 403–413. doi:10.1080/10400410409534551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, S. (2007). The Bengal Renaissance: Identity and creativity from Rammohun Roy to Rabindranath Tagore. New Delhi: Permanent Black.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, S. (2011). Contesting (Simonton’s) blind variation, selective retention theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 161–182. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.571190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, S. (2013). Epistemic complexity and the sciences of the artificial. In H. Anderson, D. Dieks, W.J. Gonzalez, T. Uebel & G. Wheeler (Eds.), New challenges to philosophy of science (pp. 299–312). Dordecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, S. (2016). From The Sciences of the Artificial to cognitive history. In R. Franz & L. Marsh (Eds.), Minds, models and milieux: Commemorating the centennial of the birth of Herbert Simon (pp. 60–70). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, S. (2019). A cognitive historical approach to creativity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, M. (1992). Human minds: an exploration. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Gabora, L. (2007). Why the creative process is not Darwinian. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2), 361–365. doi:10.1080/10400410701753317
   Google Scholar
• Gabora, L. (2011). An analysis of the blind variation and selective retention theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 155–163. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.571187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garb, T. (2001). ‘To kill the nineteenth century’: Sex and spectatorship with Gertrude and Pablo. In C. Green (Ed.), Picasso’s Les Demoiselles d’Avignon (pp. 55–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golding, J. (1958). The ‘Demoiselles d’Avignon’. The Burlington Magazine, 100(662), 154–163.
   Google Scholar
• Golding, J. (2001). Les Demoiselles d’Avignon and the exhibition of 1988. In C. Green (Ed.), Picasso’s Les Demoiselles d’Avignon (pp. 15–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gombrich, E. H. (1969). Art and illusion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on man (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, H. E. (1989). The evolving systems approach to creative work. In D. B. Wallace & H. E. Gruber (Eds.), Creative people at work ‘(pp 3-24). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hadamard, J. (1954). The psychology of invention in the mathematical field. New York, NY: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Kozbelt, A. (2008). E.H. Gombrich on creativity: A cognitive-historical case study. Creativity Research Journal, 20(1), 93–104. doi:10.1080/10400410701842128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (4th ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leighton, P. (2001). Colonialism, l’art négre and Les Demoiselles d’Avignon ‘(pp 77-103). In C. Green (Ed.), Picasso’s Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, G. (1985). Cognitive psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. H., & Sørensen, J. (Eds). (2011). Past minds: Studies in cognitive historiography. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Minsky, M. L. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision ‘(pp 211-277). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Nersessian, N. (1995). Opening the black box: Cognitive science and history of science. Osiris, 10, 196–215. doi:10.1086/368749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1976). The child and reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Poincaré, H. (1985). Mathematical creation. (G.B. Halstead, tr.) (Originally published 1913). In B. Ghiselin (Ed.), The creative process (pp 22-31). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. (1996). A life of Picasso: Volume II. 1907-1917. A painter of modern life. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, W. (1994). The genesis of Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. In W. Rubin, H. Seckel, & J. Cousins (Eds.), Les Demoiselles d’Avignon (pp. 13–144). New York, NY: Museum of Modern Art.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., Smolensky, P., McClelland, J. L., & Hinton, G. E. (1986). Schemas and thought processes in PDP models. In J. L. McCelland & D. E. Rumelhart; the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2) (pp 7-57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seckel, H. (1994). Anthology of early commentary on Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. In W. Rubin, H. Seckel, & J. Cousins (Eds.), Les Demoiselles d’Avignon (pp. 213–256). New York, NY: Museum of Modern Art.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467–482.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181–200. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2005). Darwin as a straw man: Dasgupta’s (2004) evaluation of creativity as a Darwinian process. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 299–308. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1704_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2007a). The creative process in Picasso’s Guernica sketches: Monotonic improvements versus nonmonotonic variants. Creativity Research Journal, 329–344. doi:10.1080/10400410701753291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2007b). Rejoinder: Picasso’s Guernica’s creativity as a Darwininan process: Definitions, clarifications, misconceptions, and applications. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 381–394. doi:10.1080/10400410701753341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity. Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 156–179. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2010.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, L. (1988). The philosophical brothel. October, 44, Spring, 7-74. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. R. (1988). Computational philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tweney, R. D. (2009). Mathematical representations in science: A cognitive-historical case history. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 758–776. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01043.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, D. B., & Gruber, H. E. (Eds). (1989). Creative people at work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. J., & Perkins, D. N. (Eds.). (1992). Inventive minds. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. W. (2004). On structure in the creative process: A quantitative case study of the creativity of Picasso’s Guernica. Empirical Study of the Arts, 22, 23–54. doi:10.2190/EH48-K59C-DFRB-LXE7
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. W., & Hass, R. (2007). We are all partly right: Comment on “The creative process in Picasso’s Guernical sketches: Monotonic improvements versus nonmonotonic variants.”. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 345–360. doi:10.1080/10400410701753309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zervos, C. (1985). Conversations with Picasso. In B. Ghiselin (Ed.), The creative process (pp 48-53). Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar