Comparative Analysis of Different Creativity Tests for the Prediction of Students’ Scientific Creativity

References

• Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayas, M. B., & Sak, U. (2013). Creative Scientific Ability Test (C-SAT): A new measure of scientific creativity. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 55(3), 316–329.
   Google Scholar
• Ayas, M. B., & Sak, U. (2014). Objective measure of scientific creativity: Psychometric validity of the creative scientific ability test. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 195–205. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermejo, M., Ruiz-Melero, M., Esparza, J., Ferrando, M., & Pons, R. (2016). A new measurement of scientific creativity: The study of its psychometric properties. Annals Of Psychology, 32(3), 652–661.
   Google Scholar
• Citradevi, C. P., Widiyatmoko, A., & Khusniati, M. (2017). The effectiveness of project based learning (PjBL) worksheet to improve science process skill for seven graders of junior high school in the topic of environmental pollution. Unnes Science Education Journal, 6(3), 1677–1685.
   Google Scholar
• Cowley, S. J., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2017). Cognition beyond the brain-computation, interactivity and human artifice. NewYork, NY : Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York. NY: Harper Collons.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454. doi:10.1037/h0063487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, S., & Yang, Y. (2012). Project-based learning: An effective approach to link teacher professional development and students learning. Journal of Educational Technology Develpoment and Exchange, 5(2), 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hodosyová, M., Útla, J., Vanyová, M., Vnuková, P., & Lapitková, V. (2015). The development of science process skills in physics education. Paper presented in the 5th World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership, WCLTA(2014), Prague.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389–403. doi:10.1080/09500690110098912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, P.-S., Peng, S.-L., Chen, H.-C., Tseng, L.-C., & Hsu, L.-C. (2017). The relative influences of domain knowledge and domain-general divergent thinking on scientific creativity and mathematical creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illeris, K. (2009). Competence, learning and education: How can competences be learned, and how can they be developed in formal education? In K. Illeris (Ed.), International perspectives on competence development: Developing skills and capabilities (pp. 83–98). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2006). Intelligent testing with Torrance. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 99–102. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1801_11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy for Educational Research (NAER). (2000). Item difficulty index. 20160422 Retrieved from http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1315295/.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2015). OECD. StatExtracts-OECE Health Statistics. 20171220 Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/data/oecd-health-statistics_health-data-en.
   Google Scholar
• Oyao, S. G., Holbrook, J., Rannikmäe, M., & Pagunsan, M. M. (2015). A competence-based science learning framework illustrated through the study of natural hazards and disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14), 2237–2263. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1075076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, M., & Plucker, J. A. (2018). Looking for renaissance people: Examining domain specificity-generality of creativity using item response theory models. Creativity Research Journal, 30(3), 241–248. doi:10.1080/10400419.2018.1488348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, B., Cao, X., Chen, Q., Zhuang, K., & Qiu, J. (2017). Different brain structures associated with artistic and scientific creativity: A voxel-based morphometry study. Scientific Reports, 7(4), 1–8. doi:10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1992). Buy low and sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(1), 1–5. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.1992.tb00002.x
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1965). Scientific views of creativity and factors affecting its growth. Daedalus, 94, 663–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1980). Growing up creatively gifted: The 22-year longitudinal study. The Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 3, 148–158.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1990). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Figural forms A and B: Directions manual. Bensenville: Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, -J.-J., Chen, J.-C., & Lin, -W.-W. (1999). A brief introduction to the scale of creativity. The article of the conclusion of a case applied for the study of National Science Council, Kaohsiung.
   Google Scholar