A Distracted Muse: The Positive Effect of Dual-Task Distraction on Creative Potential

References

• Almeida, L. S., Prieto, L. P., Ferrando, M., Oliveira, E., & Ferrándiz, C. (2008). Torrance test of creative thinking: The question of its construct validity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(1), 53–58. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood- creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779. doi:10.1037/a0012815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., Kam, J. W., Franklin, M. S., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1117–1122. doi:10.1177/0956797612446024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavez-Eakle, R. A. (2007). Creativity, DNA, and cerebral blood flow. In C. Martindale, P. Locher, & V. M. Petrov (Eds.), Evolutionary and neurocognitive approaches to aesthetics, creativity and the arts (pp. 209–224). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
   Google Scholar
• Chrysikou, E. G., & Weisberg, R. W. (2005). Following the wrong footsteps: Fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(5), 1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., & Schulman, M. (1971). Effects of an external stress on commonality of verbal associates. Psychological Reports, 28(1), 328–330. doi:10.2466/pr0.1971.28.1.328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 822. doi:10.1037/a0019749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 147–178. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0403_1
   Google Scholar
• Flaherty, A. W. (2005). Frontotemporal and dopaminergic control of idea generation and creative drive. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 493(1), 147–153. doi:10.1002/cne.20768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forthmann, B., Gerwig, A., Holling, H., Çelik, P., Storme, M., & Lubart, T. (2016). The be- creative effect in divergent thinking: The interplay of instruction and object frequency. Intelligence, 57, 25–32. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2016.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. B., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 613–617. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J., Christensen, P., Merrifield, P.,& Wilson, R. (1978). Alternate Uses (Form B, Form C). Orange, CA: Sheridan Psychological Services
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1978). Alternate uses. Sheridan Supply Company, Orange, California Sheridan Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., Merrifield, P. R., & Wilson, R. C. (1978). Alternate uses: Manual, test booklet (B & C), scoring key (B & C). Orange, California Sheridan Psychological Services
   Google Scholar
• Hass, R. W. (2015). Feasibility of online divergent thinking assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 85–93. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B. (2011). The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta psychologica, 136(2), 189–202. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jett, Q. R., & George, J. M. (2003). Work interrupted: A closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 494–507. doi:10.5465/amr.2003.10196791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (2008). Meta-analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 106–130. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, N. W., & Smith, S. M. (2011). Collaborative fixation: Effects of others’ ideas on brainstorming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 359–371. doi:10.1002/acp.1699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility–a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97(2), 253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krop, H. D., Alegre, C. E., & Williams, C. D. (1969). Effects of induced stress on convergent and divergent thinking. Psychological Reports, 24(3), 895–898. doi:10.2466/pr0.1969.24.3.895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J. G., Akinola, M., & Mason, M. F. (2017). “Switching On” creativity: Task switching can increase creativity by reducing cognitive fixation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 139, 63–75. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubow, R. E., Ingberg-Sachs, Y., Zalstein-Orda, N., & Gerwitz, J. C. (1992). Latent inhibition in low and high “psychotic-prone” normal subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(5), 563–572. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90197-W
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, C. (1977). Creativity, consciousness, and cortical arousal. Journal of Altered States of Consciousness, 3(1), 69–87.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. Handbook of Creativity, 2, 137–152.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, C., & Dailey, A. (1996). Creativity: Primary process cognition and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 20(4), 409–414. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(95)00202-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martindale, C., & Hines, D. (1975). Creativity and cortical activation during creative, Intellectual and EEG feedback tasks. Biological Psychology, 3(2), 91–100. doi:10.1016/0301-0511(75)90011-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37(1), 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram, R. M., Milgram, N. A., Rosenbloom, G., & Rabkin, L. (1978). Quantity and quality of creative thinking in children and adolescents. Child Development, 49(2), 385–388. doi:10.2307/1128702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norlander, T., & Gustafson, R. (1998). Effects of alcohol on a divergent figural fluency test during the illumination phase of the creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 11(3), 265–274. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1103_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different?: Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent
thinking. Intelligence, 39(1), 36–45. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochse, R., & Van Lill, B. (1990). A critical appraisal of the theoretical validity of the Mednick remote association test. South African Journal of Psychology, 20(3), 195–199. doi:10.1177/008124639002000309
   Google Scholar
• Oppezzo, M., & Schwartz, D. L. (2014). Give your ideas some legs: The positive effect of walking on creative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(4), 1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. B., Smith, K. W., & Carson, S. (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: Replication and commentary. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(7), 1137–1147. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00004-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal study data. Creativity Research Journal, 12(2), 103–114. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1202_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1986). The discriminant validity of gifted children’s divergent thinking test scores. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(2), 78–82. doi:10.1177/001698628603000207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1999). A longitudinal study of exceptional giftedness and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12(2), 161–164. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1202_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2005). Motivation, competence, and creativity. In A. Elliott & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of achievement motivation and competence (pp. 609–623). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2010). Divergent thinking, creativity, and ideation. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, 413, 446.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2016). Commentary: Overview of developmental perspectives on creativity and the realization of potential. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2016(151), 97–109. doi:10.1002/cad.20145
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2010). Do tests of divergent thinking have an experiential bias? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 144–148. doi:10.1037/a0018969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., & Cramond, B. (2010). Torrance tests of creative thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty-year follow-up. Creativity Research Journal, 22(4), 361–368. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.523393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 174. doi:10.1037/h0027448
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simon, J. R., & Small, A. M., Jr. (1969). Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(5), 433. doi:10.1037/h0028034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643. doi:10.1037/h0054651
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Technical-norms manual. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1977). Creativity in the class- room. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P., & Michie, H. W. (1959). Explorations in creative thinking in the early school years: I. scoring manual for a test of creative thinking (Research Memorandum BER-59-1). Minneapolis: Bureau of Educational Research, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar