DRD2 Taq IA Polymorphism Interacts with Parenting in Predicting Creativity: Evidence of Differential Susceptibility

References

• Adam, K. S., Keller, A., West, M., Larose, S., & Goszer, L. B. (1994). Parental representation in suicidal adolescents: A controlled study. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 28, 418–425. doi:10.3109/00048679409075868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, C. L., & Kidd, K. K. (1993). Population frequencies of the A1 allele at the dopamine D2 receptor locus. Biological Psychiatry, 34, 204–209. doi:10.1016/0006-3223(93)90073-M
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsky, J. (1997). Variation in susceptibility to rearing influences: An evolutionary argument. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 182–186. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0803_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsky, J. (2005). Differential susceptibility to rearing influences: An evolutionary hypothesis and some evidence. In B. Ellis & D. Bjorklund (Eds.), Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development (pp. 139–163). New York, NY: Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). For better and for worse: Differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 300–304. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00525.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsky, J., Hsieh, K., & Crnic, K. (1998). Mothering, fathering, and infant negativity as antecedents of boys’ externalizing problems and inhibition at age 3: Differential susceptibility to rearing influence? Development and Psychopathology, 10, 301–319. doi:10.1017/S095457949800162X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsky, J., Jonassaint, C., Pluess, M., Stanton, M., Brummett, B., & Williams, R. (2009c). Vulnerability genes or plasticity genes? Molecular Psychiatry, 14, 746–754. doi:10.1038/mp.2009.44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009a). The nature (and nurture?) of plasticity in early human development. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 345–351. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01136.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2009b). Beyond diathesis-stress: Differential susceptibility to environmental influence. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 885–908. doi:10.1037/a0017376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsky, J., & Pluess, M. (2013). Beyond risk, resilience, and dysregulation: Phenotypic plasticity and human development. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 1243–1261. doi:10.1017/S095457941300059X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsky, J., Pluess, M., & Widaman, K. F. (2013). Confirmatory and competitive evaluation of alternative gene–environment interaction hypotheses. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 1135–1143. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 57, 289–300. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics, 29, 1165–1188. doi:10.1214/aos/1013699998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, S., Ozkaragoz, T., Young, R. M., & Noble, E. P. (2002). D2 dopamine receptor gene polymorphism discriminates two kinds of novelty seeking. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 867–882. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00197-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. I, aetiology and psychopathology in the light of attachment theory. British Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 201–210. doi:10.1192/bjp.130.3.201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, W. T., & Ellis, B. J. (2005). Biological sensitivity to context: I. An evolutionary-developmental theory of the origins and functions of stress reactivity. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 271–301. doi:10.10170S0954579405050145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. (2006). Gene–environment interactions in psychiatry. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 7, 583–590. doi:10.1038/nrn1925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chávezeakle, R. A., Ma, D. C. L., & Cruzfuentes, C. (2006). Personality: A possible bridge between creativity and psychopathology? Creativity Research Journal, 18, 27–38. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1801_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chermahini, S. A., & Hommel, B. (2010). The (b)link between creativity and dopamine: Spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking. Cognition, 115, 458–465. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deater-Deckard, K., & Dodge, K. (1997). Spare the rod, spoil the authors: Emerging themes in research on parenting. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 230–235. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0803_13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, B. J., Boyce, W. T., Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary–neurodevelopmental theory. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 7–28. doi:10.1017/S0954579410000611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagundo, A. B., Fernández-Aranda, F., De, L. T. R., Verdejo-García, A., Granero, R., Penelo, E., & Jiménez-Murcia, S. (2014). Dopamine drd2/ankk1 taq1a and dat1 VNTR polymorphisms are associated with a cognitive flexibility profile in pathological gamblers. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 28, 1170–1177. doi:10.1177/0269881114551079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, D. D., Copeland, D., & Saxon, T. F. (2013). The relationship between parenting styles and creativity in a sample of Jamaican children. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 119–128. doi:10.1080/10400419.2013.752287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaherty, A. W. (2005). Frontotemporal and dopaminergic control of idea generation and creative drive. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 493, 147–153. doi:10.1002/cne.20768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galton, F. (1874). English men of science. London, England: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, C. (2012). The effect of parenting styles and personality on primary school children's social creativity and social preferences. Chinese Journal of Special Education, 11, 78–83
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gute, G., Gute, D. S., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihályi, M. (2008). The early lives of highly creative persons: The influence of the complex family. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 343–357. doi:10.1080/10400410802391207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, L. A., Witt, E. A., Fitzgerald, H. E., von Eye, A., & Zhao, Y. (2011). Parent behavior, children’s technology use and creativity: Videogames count but parents don’t! Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS international conference on Communications and information technology  (pp. 19–24). Corfu Island, Greece: World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., Xu, Y., Jiang, Q., Yu, S., & Zheng, F. (2009). The reliability and validity of a Chinese version of the parental bonding instrument. Journal of Psychological Science, 32, 193–196.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, E. G., Nothen, M. M., Grunhage, F., Farde, L., Nakashima, Y., Propping, P., & Sedvall, G. C. (1999). Polymorphisms in the dopamine D2 receptor gene and their relationships to striatal dopamine receptor density of healthy volunteers. Molecular Psychiatry, 4, 290–296. doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4000532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keltikangas-Järvinen, L., Pulkki-Råback, L., Elovainio, M., Raitakari, O. T., Viikari, J., & Lehtimäki, T. (2009). Drd2 c32806t modifies the effect of child-rearing environment on adulthood novelty seeking. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 150B, 389–394. doi:10.1002/ajmg.b.30830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., Wang, M., Xu, F., Li, G., & Zhang, Q. (2017). On the relationship between parenting styles and creativity: The mediating role of personality. Psychological Exploration, 37(6), 537–542.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, S. C., Wu, P. L., Ko, H. C., Wu, J. Y., Huang, S. Y., Lin, W., & Lu, R.-B. (2007). Specific personality traits and dopamine, serotonin genes in anxiety-depressive alcoholism among han chinese in taiwan. Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 31, 1526–1534. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.07.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey, E. W., & Caldera, Y. M. (2006). Mother–father–child triadic interaction and mother–child dyadic interaction: Gender differences within and between contexts. Sex Roles, 55, 511–521. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9106-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Zhang, H., & Zhang, L. (2013a). The influence of parental rearing style on students’ creativity tendency and self-efficacy. China Journal of Health Psychology, 21, 589–591. doi:10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2013.04.013
   Google Scholar
• Liu, G., Zhang, S., Zhang, J., Lee, C., Wang, Y., & Brownell, M. (2013b). Autonomous motivation and Chinese adolescents’ creative thinking: The moderating role of parental involvement. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 446–456. doi:10.1080/10400419.2013.843401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., Zhou, S., Chu, Y., Yang, H., & Liu, Q. (2009). Reliability and validity of parental bonding instrument-Chinese version in college students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 17, 547–549.
   Google Scholar
• Man, D., Li, Y., & Zhang, J. (2015). Relationship between parental control, self-esteem and primary school student ’ s social creativity. Studies of Psychology & Behavior, 13(1), 81–86.
   Google Scholar
• May, R. (1975). The courage to create. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. L., Lambert, A. D., & Speirs Neumeister, K. L. (2012). Parenting style, perfectionism, and creativity in high-ability and high-achieving young adults. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35, 344–365. doi:10.1177/0162353212459257
   Google Scholar
• Mithen, S. (1998). Creativity in human evolution and prehistory. Abingdonon-Thames, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mozafari, S. (2014). Prediction of creativity and academic achievement based on child rearing styles. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Research, 3(2), 144–152. http://www. ijpbrjournal.com
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M., Runco, M. A., Acar, S., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2013). Reanalysis of genetic data and rethinking dopamine’s relationship with creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 147–148. doi:10.1002/cd.23219967208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G. (1989). The parental bonding instrument: Psychometric properties reviewed. Psychiatric Developments, 7(4), 317–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parker, G. (1990). The parental bonding instrument. a decade of research. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 25(6), 281–282. doi:10.1007/BF00782881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G., Tupling, H., & Brown, L. B. (1979). A parental bonding instrument. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 52, 1–10. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1979.tb02487.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawlings, D., Twomey, F., Burns, E., & Morris, S. (1998). Personality, creativity and aesthetic preference: Comparing psychoticism, sensation seeking, schizotypy and openness to experience. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 16(2), 153–178. doi:10.2190/8GVJ-ERL3-HYUM-EH88
   Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon, R., & Illies, J. J. (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 55–77. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, F., Li, Y., & Zhang, J. (2017). Perceived parental control and chinese middle school adolescents’ creativity: The mediating role of autonomous motivation. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity & the Arts, 11, 34–42. doi:10.1037/aca0000078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter, M., Roth, S., Holve, K., & Hennig, J. (2006). Identification of first candidate genes for creativity: A pilot study. Brain Research, 1069, 190–197. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, T., & Noble, E. P. (1996). 3h)naloxone binding in the human brain: Alcoholism and the taqi a d2 dopamine receptor polymorphism. Brain Research, 718, 193–197. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(96)00068-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, T., & Noble, E. P. (2003). Association of seven polymorphisms of the d2 dopamine receptor gene with brain receptor-binding characteristics. Neurochemical Research, 28, 73–82. doi:10.1023/A:1021648128758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. (1959). Toward a theory of creativity. In H. Anderson (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation. New York, NY: Harper & Row, 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Roisman, G. I., Newman, D. A., Chris, F. R., Haltigan, J. D., Groh, A. M., & Haydon, K. C. (2012). Distinguishing differential susceptibility from diathesis–stress: Recommendations for evaluating interaction effects. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 389–409. doi:10.1017/S0954579412000065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule, E. G., & Irwin, D. W. (1988). Fostering intrapreneurship: The new competitive edge. The Journal of Business Strategy, 9, 44–47. doi:10.1108/eb039227
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (1991). The evaluative, valuative, and divergent thinking of children. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25, 311–319. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1991.tb01143.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (2010). Creativity research: A historical view. In J. C. Kaufman, J. Caaa, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 3–19). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Noble, E. P., Reiter-Palmon, R., Acar, S., Ritchie, T., & Yurkovich, J. M. (2011). The genetic basis of creativity and ideational fluency. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 376–380. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.621859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, C. E., Diggens, D. R., & Millman, H. L. (1976). Intercorrelations among measures of creativity, openness to experience and sensation seeking in a college sample. College Student Journal, 10(4), 332–339.
   Google Scholar
• Siegelman, M. (1973). Parent behavior correlates of personality traits related to creativity in sons and daughters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 40, 43–47. doi:10.1037/h0033981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smorti, M., & Guarnieri, S. (2014). Sensation seeking, parental bond, and risky driving in adolescence: Some relationships, matter more to girls than boys. Safety Science, 70, 172–179. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi, H., Tomita, H., Taki, Y., Kikuchi, Y., Ono, C., Yu, Z., & Kawashima, R. (2015). The associations among the dopamine d2 receptor taq1, emotional intelligence, creative potential measured by divergent thinking, and motivational state and these associations’ sex differences. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 912–924. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widaman, K. F., Helm, J. L., Castro-Schilo, L., Pluess, M., Stallings, M. C., & Belsky, J. (2012). Distinguishing ordinal and disordinal interactions. Psychological Methods, 17, 615–622. doi:10.1037/a0030003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yau, J., & Smetana, J. (1996). Adolescent–parent conflict among Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Child Development, 67, 1262–1275. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01-794.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Q., Zhang, S., & Zhang, J. (2017). Association of dopamine d2 receptor gene with creative ideation. Creativity Research Journal, 29, 108–113. doi:10.1080/10400419.2-017.1302758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabelina, D. L., Colzato, L., Beeman, M., & Hommel, B. (2016). Dopamine and the creative mind: Individual differences in creativity are predicted by interactions between dopamine genes dat and comt. PLoS One, 11, e0146768. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Han, X., Si, S., & Zhang, S. (2018). The interaction of TPH1 A779C polymorphism and maternal authoritarianism on creative potential. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2106. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Li, J., Zheng, X., Zhang, S., & Liu, G. (2014b). The effect of parenting on junior high school students’ creative thinking: The moderating role of self-concept. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 12, 145–150.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Li, Z., Chen, J., Li, X., Zhang, J., & Belsky, J. (2016). The bdnf val66met polymorphism interacts with maternal parenting influencing adolescent depressive symptoms: Evidence of differential susceptibility model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 471–483. doi:10.1007/s10964-015-0378-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Zhang, M., & Zhang, J. (2014a). An exploratory study on DRD2 and creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 115–123. doi:10.1080/10400419.2014.874267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., & Zhang, J.. (2017). The association of TPH genes with creative potential. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity & the Arts, 11, 2–9. doi:10.1037/aca0000073
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., Shin, S. J., Brass, D. J., Choi, J., & Zhang, Z. X. (2009). Social networks, personal values, and creativity: Evidence for curvilinear and interaction effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1544–1552. doi:10.1037/a0016285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar