Reflecting on the Past, Looking Towards the Future: The Effects of Case Analysis on Forecasting

References

• Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antes, A. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2012). Strategies for leader cognition: Viewing the glass “half full” and “half empty”. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 425–442 3 doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antes, A. L., Thiel, C. E., Martin, L. E., Stenmark, C. K., Connelly, S., Devenport, L. D., & Mumford, M. D. (2012). Applying cases to solve ethical problems: The significance of positive and process-oriented reflection. Ethics & Behavior, 22(2), 113–130. doi:10.1080/10508422.2012.655646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagdasarov, Z., Thiel, C. E., Johnson, J. F., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L. N., Devenport, L. D., & Mumford, M. D. (2013). Case-based ethics instruction: The influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 1305–1322. doi:10.1007/s11948-012-9414-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basadur, M. (1995). Optimal ideation-evaluation ratios. Creativity Research Journal, 8(1), 63–75. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj0801_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besemer, S. P., & O’Quin, K. (1999). Confirming the three-factor creative product analysis matrix model in an American sample. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 287–296. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1204_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, C. S., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Errors in idea evaluation: Preference for the unoriginal? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(3), 197–222. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01288.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, C. L., Shipman, A. S., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). The effects of forecasting on creative problem-solving: An experimental study. Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 119–138. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.481482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197–253. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Feng Kao, C. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughron, J. J., Antes, A. L., Stenmark, C. K., Thiel, C. E., Wang, X., & Mumford, M. D. (2011). Sensemaking strategies for ethical decision making. Ethics & Behavior, 21(5), 351–366. doi:10.1080/10508422.2011.604293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughron, J. J., & Mumford, M. D. (2008). Project planning: The effects of using formal planning techniques on creative problem‐solving. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(3), 204–215. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2008.00484.x
   Google Scholar
• Christiaans, H. H. (2002). Creativity as a design criterion. Communication Research Journal, 14, 41–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PIR) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• D’Argembeau, A., & Van der Linden, M. (2004). Phenomenal characteristics associated with projecting oneself back into the past and forward into the future: Influence of valence and temporal distance. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(4), 844–858. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2004.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dailey, L., & Mumford, M. D. (2006). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Errors in appraising the implications of new ideas. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 385–390. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denny, E. B., & Hunt, R. R. (1992). Affective valence and memory in depression: Dissociation of recall and fragment completion. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101(3), 575–580. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.101.3.575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dess, G. G., & Picken, J. C. (2000). Changing roles: Leadership in the 21st Century. Organizational Dynamics, 28(3), 18–34. doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(00)88447-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörner, D., & Schaub, H. (1994). Errors in planning and decision-making and the nature of human information processing. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 43(4), 433–453. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1994.tb00839.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, F. E., & Garcia, J. E. (1987). New approaches to effective leadership: Cognitive resources and organizational performance. Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C., & Mumford, M. D. (2013). Evaluation, criticism, and creativity: Criticism content and effects on creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 314–331. doi:10.1037/a0032616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimsley, G. L., Ruch, F. L., Warren, N. D., & Ford, J. S. (1985). Manual for the employee attitude survey, test of verbal reasoning. Glendale, CA: Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1966). Measurement and creativity. Theory into Practice, 5(4), 185–189. doi:10.1080/00405846609542023
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, K. J. (1990). Case-based planning: A framework for planning from experience. Cognitive Science, 14(3), 385–443. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1403_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haws, K. L., Dholakia, U. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2010). An assessment of chronic regulatory focus measures. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(5), 967–982. doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.5.967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hester, K. S., Robledo, I. C., Barrett, J. D., Peterson, D. R., Hougen, D. P., Day, E. A., & Mumford, M. D. (2012). Causal analysis to enhance creative problem-solving: Performance and effects on mental models. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 115–133. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.677249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1280–1300. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social Psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1–46). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3–23. doi:10.1002/ejsp.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounshell, D. A. (1992). Du Pont and the management of large-scale research and development. In P. Gallison & B. Hevly (Eds.), Big science. The growth of large-scale research (pp. 236–261). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, J. M., & Boies, K. (2004). Champions of technological innovation: The influences of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence. Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 130–149. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. G., Boal, K. B., & Dodge, G. E. (1999). The effects of visionary and crisis responsive charisma on followers: An experimental examination of two kinds of charismatic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 10(3), 423–448. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00027-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacques, E. (1976). A general theory of bureaucracy. London, England: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonergan, D. C., Scott, G. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Effects of appraisal and revision standards. Creativity Research Journal, 16(2–3), 231–246. doi:10.1080/10400419.2004.9651455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcy, R. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Social Innovation: Enhancing Creative Performance Through Causal Analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 123–140 2–3 doi:10.1080/10400410701397180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcy, R. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Leader cognition: Improving leader performance through causal analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1–19 1 doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marta, S., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Leadership skills and group performance: Situational demands, behavioral requirements, and planning. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), 97–120. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. E., Stenmark, C. K., Thiel, C. E., Antes, A. L., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. D. (2011). The influence of temporal orientation and affective frame on use of ethical decision-making strategies. Ethics & Behavior, 21(2), 127–146. doi:10.1080/10508422.2011.551470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO five-factor inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(3), 587–596. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, T., Mulhearn, T. J., & Mumford, M. D. (2019). Taking the good with the bad: The impact of forecasting timing and valence on idea evaluation and creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. doi:10.1037/aca0000237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mecca, J. (2014). Climate for creativity: The use of storytelling to influence climate perceptions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oklahoma, Norman.
   Google Scholar
• Mecca, J. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2014). Imitation and creativity: Beneficial effects of propulsion strategies and specificity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(3), 209–236. doi:10.1002/jocb.49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrifield, P. R., Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., & Frick, J. W. (1962). The role of intellectual factors in problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 76(10), 1–21. doi:10.1037/h0093850
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1991). Learning-1, planning-0- reply. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 463–466. doi:10.1002/smj.4250120606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Osburn, H. K. (2002). Planning in organizations: Performance as a multi-level phenomenon. In F. J. Yammarino & F. Dansereau (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues: The many faces of multi-level issues (pp. 3–36). Oxford, U.K.: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., & Hunter, S. T. (2005). Innovation in organizations: A multi-level perspective on creativity. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues: Vol. 4. Multi-level issues in strategy and methods (pp. 317–376). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Bedell-Avers, K. E., & Hunter, S. T. (2008). Planning for innovation: A multi-level perspective. In M. D. Mumford, S. T. Hunter, & K. E. Bedell-Avers (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues (Vol. VII, pp. 17–34). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Barrett, J. D., & Hester, K. S. (2012). Background data: Use of experiential knowledge in personnel selection. In N. Schmidt (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personnel assessment and selection (pp. 353–382). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Hester, K. S., & Robledo, I. C. (2012). Creativity in organizations: Importance and approaches. In M. D. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 3–16). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Hemlin, S., & Mulhearn, T. J. (2017). Leading for creativity: Functions, models, and domains. In M. D. Mumford & S. Hemlin (Eds.), Handbook of research on leadership and creativity (pp. 1–16). Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., & Gaddis, B. (2003). How creative leaders think: Experimental findings and cases. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4–5), 411–432. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00045-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27–43. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Lonergan, D. C., & Scott, G. (2002). Evaluating creative ideas: Processes, standards, and context. Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the Disciplines, 22, 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Marks, M. A., Connelly, M. S., Zaccaro, S. J., & Johnson, J. F. (1998). Domain-based scoring of divergent-thinking tests: Validation evidence in an occupational sample. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 151–163. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1102_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 30–47. doi:10.1002/jocb.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Reiter#Palmon, R., Uhlman, C. E., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91–122
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Reiter‐Palmon, R., Uhlman, C. E., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 91–122. doi:10.1080/10400419109534380
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Van Doorn, J. R. (2001). Performance in planning: Processes, requirements, and errors. Review of General Psychology, 5(3), 213–240. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.3.213
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Steele, L., McIntosh, T., & Mulhearn, T. (2015). Forecasting and leader performance: Objective cognition in a socio-organizational context. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(3), 359–369. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Todd, E. M., Higgs, C., & McIntosh, T. (2017). Cognitive skills and leadership performance: The nine critical skills. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 24–39. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osburn, H. K., & Mumford, M. D. (2006). Creativity and planning: Training interventions to develop creative problem-solving skills. Creativity Research Journal, 18(2), 173–190. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1802_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon, R., Wigert, B., & de Vreede, T. (2012). Team creativity and innovation: The effect of group composition, social processes, and cognition. In M. D. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 295–326). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, F. L., & Ruch, W. W. (1980). Employee aptitude survey. Los Angeles, CA: Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Smith, W. R. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(3), 295–302. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90105-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scandell, D. J. (2000). Development and initial validation of validity scales for the NEO-five factor inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(6), 1153–1162. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00262-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, G. M., Lonergan, D. C., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Conceptual combination: Alternative knowledge structures, alternative heuristics. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 79–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedikides, C., & Green, J. D. (2004). What I don’t recall can’t hurt me: Information negativity versus information inconsistency as determinants of memorial self-defense. Social Cognition, 22, 4–29. doi:10.1521/soco.22.1.4.30987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipman, A. S., Byrne, C. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Leader vision formation and forecasting: The effects of forecasting extent, resources, and timeframe. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 439–456. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenmark, C. K., Antes, A. L., Wang, X., Caughron, J. J., Thiel, C. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Strategies in forecasting outcomes in ethical decision-making: Identifying and analyzing the causes of the problem. Ethics & Behavior, 20(2), 110–127. doi:10.1080/10508421003595935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, J. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). The origins of vision: Effects of reflection, models, and analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 121–148 1 doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591–620. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vessey, W. B., Barrett, J., & Mumford, M. D. (2011). Leader cognition under threat: “Just the facts”. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(4), 710–728. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, L. L., Mulhearn, T. J., Todd, E. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2017). Leader idea evaluation and follower creativity: Challenges, constraints, and capabilities. In M. D. Mumford & S. Hemlin (Eds.), Handbook of research on leadership and creativity (pp. 82–99). Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, L. L., Steele, L. M., Medeiros, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2019). Minding the gap between generation and implementation: Effects of idea source, goals, and climate on selecting and refining creative ideas. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13, 2–14. doi:10.1037/aca0000157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, L. L., Steele, L. M., & Song, H. (2017). Re-examining the Relationship Between Need for Cognition and Creativity: Predicting Creative Problem Solving Across Multiple Domains. Creativity Research Journal, 29, 21–28 1 doi:10.1080/10400419.2017.1263505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. W., & Hass, R. (2007). Commentaries: We are all partly right: Comment on Simonton. Creativity Research Journal, 19(4), 345–360. doi:10.1080/10400410701753309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar