559
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Social Perceptions of a Creative Person:Stereotypes and Prejudice of a Creative Student among German Adolescents

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2002). Developing adolescents: A reference for professionals. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M. (2007). Social psychology (6th ed.). Pearson Education
  • Bar-Tal, D., Graumann, C. F., Kruglanski, A. W., & Stroebe, W. (1989). Stereotyping and prejudice: Changing conceptions. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag Publishing.
  • Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2008). The relationship between measures of creativity and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 816–821 doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.014
  • Brewer, M. B. (1996). When stereotypes lead to stereotyping: The use of stereotype in person perception. In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 254–275). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Chan, D. W., & Chan, L. K. (1999). Implicit theories of creativity: Teachers’ perception of student characteristics in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 12(3), 185–195. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1203_3
  • Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x
  • Clegg, J. M., Wen, N. J., & Legare, C. H. (2017). Is non-conformity WEIRD? Cultural variation in adults’ beliefs about children’s competency and conformity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(3), 428–441. doi:10.1037/xge0000275
  • Darvishi, Z., & Pakdaman, S. (2014). “Fourth Grade Slump in Creativity”: Development of creativity in primary school children. GSTF Journal of Law and Social Sciences (JLSS), 1(2).
  • Dasgupta, N. (2004). Implicit ingroup favoritism, outgroup favoritism, and their behavioral manifestations. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 143–169. doi:10.1023/b:sore.0000027407.70241.15
  • De Bruyn, E. H., & Van Den Boom, D. C. (2005). Interpersonal behavior, peer popularity, and self‐esteem in early adolescence. Social Development, 14(4), 555–573. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2005.00317.x
  • Estrada, J. D., García-Ael, C., & Martorell, J. L. (2015). Gender differences in adolescents’ choice of heroes and admired adults in five countries. Gender and Education, 27(1), 69–87
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
  • Fox, J. (1991). Regression diagnostics: An introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Gross, M. U. M. (1998). The ‘me’ behind the mask: Intellectually gifted students and the search for identity. Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education, 20(3), 167–174. doi:10.1080/02783199809553885
  • Hopp, M., Händel, M., Stoeger, H., Vialle, W., & Ziegler, A. (2016). A cross-national study of implicit theories of a creative person. Education Sciences, 6(4), 1–14. doi:10.3390/educsci6040038
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology, Vol I.. New York: Holt doi:10.1037/10538-000
  • Karwowski, M. (2010). Are creative students really welcome in the classrooms? Implicit theories of “good” and “creative” student’ personality among polish teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1233–1237. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.179
  • Lee, Y-T.., Albright, L., & Malloy, T. E. (2001). Social perception and stereotyping: An interpersonal and intercultural approach. International Journal of Group Tensions, 30(2), 183–209 doi:10.1023/A:1005256425413
  • Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1421–1436. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1421
  • Lim, W., & Plucker, J. A. (2001). Creativity Through a Lens of Social Responsibility: Implicit Theories of Creativity with Korean Samples.The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(2),115–130. doi:10.1002/jocb.2001.35.issue-2
  • Lubart, T. (2010). Cross-cultural perspectives on creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 265–278). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511763205.017
  • McElhaney, K. B., Antonishak, J., & Allen, J. P. (2008). “They like me, they like me not”: Popularity and adolescents’ perceptions of acceptance predicting social functioning over time. Child Development, 79(3), 720–731. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01153.x
  • Montgomery, D., Bull, K. S., & Baloche, L. (1993). Characteristics of the creative person: Perceptions of university teachers in relation to the professionalliterature. American Behavioral Scientist, 37(1), 68–78. doi:10.1177/0002764293037001007
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus statistical modeling software: Release 7.0. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén
  • Neihart, M., Pfeiffer, S. I., & Cross, T. L. (2015). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  • Niu, L., Jin, S., Li, L., & French, D. C. (2015). Popularity and social preference in Chinese adolescents: Associations with social and behavioral adjustment. Social Development, 25(4), 828–845. doi:10.1111/sode.12172
  • Proudfoot, D., Kay, A. C., & Koval, C. Z. (2015). A gender bias in the attribution of creativity: Archival and experimental evidence for the perceived association between masculinity and creative thinking. Psychological Science, 26(11), 1751–1761. doi:10.1177/0956797615598739
  • Rothenberg, A. (1990). Creativity in adolescence. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 13(3), 415–434. doi:10.1016/S0193-953X(18)30351-4
  • Rudman, L. A., & Goodwin, S. A. (2004). Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: Why do women like women more than men like men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(4), 494–509. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494
  • Rudolph, C. W., Zacher, H., & Scheibe, S. (2017). Editorial: Advances in Research on Age in the Workplace and Retirement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2147. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02147
  • Rudowicz, E., Hui, A., Ku-Yu, H. (1995). Implicit theories of creativity in Hong Kong Chinese population. Unpublished manuscript, Department ofApplied Social Sciences, City University of Hong Kong
  • Rudowicz, E., Tokarz, A., & Beauvale, A. (2009). Desirability of personal characteristics associated with creativity: Through the eyes of Polish and Chinese university students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(2), 104–115. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2009.06.003
  • Runco, M. A., & Johnson, D. J. (2002). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity: A cross-cultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3–4), 427–438.
  • Runco, M. A., Johnson, D. J., & Bear, P. K. (1993). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity. Child Study Journal, 23, 91–113.
  • Ruzgis, P., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1994). Cultural meaning systems, intelligence, and personality. In R. J. Sternberg & P. Ruzgis (Eds.), Personality and intelligence (p. 248–270). Cambridge University Press
  • Schwartz, D., Gorman, A. H., Nakamoto, J., & McKay, T. (2006). Popularity, social acceptance, and aggression in adolescent peer groups: Links with academic performance and school attendance. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1116–1127. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1116
  • Seng, Q. K., Keung, H. K., & Kay Cheng, S. (2008). Implicit theories of creativity: A comparison of student teachers in Hong Kong and Singapore. Compare, 38(1), 71–86
  • Silk, J. S., Stroud, L. R., Siegle, G. J., Dahl, R. E., Lee, K. H., & Nelson, E. E. (2012). Peer acceptance and rejection through the eyes of youth: Pupillary, eyetracking and ecological data from the Chatroom Interact task. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(1), 93–105. doi:10.1093/scan/nsr044
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 607–627. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.607
  • Stroebe, W., & Insko, C. A. (1989). Stereotype, prejudice, and discrimination: Changing conceptions in theory and research. In D. Bar-Tal, C. F. Graumann, A. W. Kruglanski, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice: Changing conceptions (pp. 3–34). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12(4), 195–199. doi:10.1177/001698626801200401
  • Yue, X. (2001). Understanding Creativity and Creative People in Chinese society: A Comparative Study among University Students in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hong Kong and Taipei. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 33(02), 148–154

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.