References
- Acar, S., Runco, M. A., & Ogurlu, U. (2019). The moderating influence of idea sequence: A re-analysis of the relationship between category switch and latency. Personality and Individual Differences, 142, 214–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.013
- Acar, S., Runco, M. A., & Park, H. (2020). What should people be told when they take a divergent thinking test? A meta-analytic review of explicit instructions for divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(1), 39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000256
- Agnoli, S., Corazza, G. E., & Runco, M. A. (2016). Estimating creativity with a multiple-measurement approach within scientific and artistic domains. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 171–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1162475
- Antink-Meyer, A., & Lederman, N. G. (2015). Creative cognition in secondary science: An exploration of divergent thinking in science among adolescents. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1547–1563. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1043599
- Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1279–1333. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552801
- Ayas, M. B., & Sak, U. (2014). Objective measure of scientific creativity: Psychometric validity of the creative scientific ability test. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 195–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.001
- Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2016). The generality-specificity of creativity: Exploring the structure of creative potential with EPoC. Learning and Individual Differences, 52, 178–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.005
- Barrett, J. D., Vessey, W. B., Griffith, J. A., Mracek, D., & Mumford, M. D. (2014). Predicting scientific creativity: The role of adversity, collaborations, and work strategies. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 39–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.873660
- Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 478–485. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048073
- Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Ideational codeswitching: Walking the talk about supporting student creativity in the classroom. Roeper Review, 29(4), 265–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190709554421
- Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.73
- Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind:. Myths and mechanisms: Routledge.
- Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
- Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
- Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391–404. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial.
- DeHaan, R. L. (2009). Teaching creativity and inventive problem solving in science. CBE Life Sciences Education, 8(3), 172–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-12-0081
- Demirhan, E., & Şahin, F. (2019). The effects of different kinds of hands-on modeling activities on the academic achievement, problem-solving skills, and scientific creativity of prospective science teachers. Research in Science Education, 25(3), 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09874-0
- Diakidoy, I.-A. N., & Constantinou, C. P. (2001). Creativity in Physics: Response fluency and task specificity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(34), 401–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_17
- Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2015). cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PloS One, 10(4), e0121945. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121945
- Dikici, A., Özdemir, G., & Clark, D. B. (2020). The relationship between demographic variables and scientific creativity: Mediating and moderating roles of scientific process skills. Research in Science Education, 50(5), 2055–2079. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9763-2
- Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365–395). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
- Dunbar, K. (1999). Science. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 525–531). San Diego, California: Academic Press.
- Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford Publications.
- Farrell, A. M. (2010). Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty, and Shiu (2009). Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 324–327. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.05.003
- Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
- Feist, G. J. (2011). Creativity in Science. In S. R. Pritzker & M. A. Runco (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity. (Vol. 1, 2nd, pp. 296–302). Academic Press/Elsevier.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
- Forthmann, B., Szardenings, C., & Holling, H. (2020). Understanding the confounding effect of fluency in divergent thinking scores: Revisiting averge scores to quantify artifactual correlations. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(1), 94–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000196
- Ghassib, H. B. (2010). Where does creativity fit into a productivist industrial model of knowledge production? Gifted and Talented International, 25(1), 13–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2010.11673540
- Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53(4), 267–293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040755
- Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Guilford, J. P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. San Diego, California: R. R. Knapp.
- Hadzigeorgiou, Y., Fokialis, P., & Kabouropoulou, M. (2012). Thinking about creativity in science education. Creative Education, 03(5), 603–611. doi:https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.35089
- Haim, K., Aschauer, W., & Weber, C. (2020). Diagnose divergenter Denkstrategien bei naturwiss. Problemstellungen [Diagnosis of divergent thinking strategies in natural science problems]. In S. Habig (Ed.), Naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen in der Gesellschaft von morgen. Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Chemie und Physik, Jahrestagung in Wien 2019 (pp. 381–384). Universität Duisburg-Essen
- Haim, K., & Weber, C. (2014). KLEx – Eine Experimentiertechnik zur Förderung kreativer Problemlösekompetenz im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht [KLEx – An experimental technique to promote creative problem-solving skills in science teaching]. In E. Feyerer, K. Hirschenhauser, & K. Soukup-Altrichter (Eds.), Last oder Lust? Forschung und Lehrer/innenbildung (pp. 207–217). Münster: Waxmann
- Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But…. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
- Heller, K. A. (2007). Scientific ability and creativity. High Ability Studies, 18(2), 209–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130701709541
- Hopf, M., Kapelari, S., & Lembens, A. (2017). Naturwissenschaftliche Grundbildung – Welchen Beitrag kann kompetenzorientierter Unterricht dazu leisten [Basic science education - What contribution can competence-oriented teaching make]? Plus Lucis, 4–10.
- Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389–403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912
- Hu, W., Shi, Q. Z., Han, Q., Wang, X., & Adey, P. (2010). Creative scientific problem finding and its developmental trend. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 46–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410903579551
- Hu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C., Meyer, W., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Increasing students’ scientific creativity: The “learn to think” intervention program. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 3–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.20
- Huang, C.-F., & Wang, K.-C. (2019). Comparative analysis of different creativity tests for the prediction of students’ scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 31(4), 443–447. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1684116
- Huang, P.-S., Peng, S.-L., Chen, H.-C., Tseng, L.-C., & Hsu, L.-C. (2017). The relative influences of domain knowledge and domain-general divergent thinking on scientific creativity and mathematical creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.001
- Jamshidian, M., & Jalal, S. (2010). Tests of homoscedasticity, normality, and missing completely at random for incomplete multivariate data. Psychometrika, 75(4), 649–674. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/S11336-010-9175-3
- Jamshidian, M., Jalal, S., & Jansen, C. (2014). MissMech: An R package for testing homoscedasticity, multivariate normality, and Missing Completely at Random (MCAR). Journal of Statistical Software, 56(6), 1–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v056.i06
- Kandemir, M. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2019). The Kaufman domains of creativity scale: Turkish validation and relationship to academic major. the journal of creative behavior, 10, 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.428
- Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 298–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029751
- Kind, P. M., & Kind, V. (2007). Creativity in science education: Perspectives and challenges for developing school science. Studies in Science Education, 43(1), 1–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260708560225
- Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery process. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
- Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 1–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_1
- Klausen, S. H. (2013). Sources and conditions of scientific creativity. In K. Thomas & J. Chan (Eds.), Handbook of research on creativity (pp. 33–47). Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
- Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). New York: Cambridge university press.
- Krumm, G., Arán Filipppetti, V., Lemos, V., Koval, J., & Balabanian, C. (2016). Construct validity and factorial invariance across sex of the Torrance test of creative thinking – figural form A in Spanish-speaking children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 180–189. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.003
- Krumm, G., Lemos, V., & Filippetti, V. A. (2014). Factor structure of the torrance tests of creative thinking figural form b in Spanish-speaking children: Measurement invariance across gender. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 72–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.843908
- Lee, H., & Cho, Y. (2007). Factors affecting problem finding depending on degree of structure of problem situation. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(2), 113–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.101.2.113-125
- Leite, W. L., Stapleton, L. M., & Bettini, E. F. (2019). Propensity score analysis of complex survey data with structural equation modeling: A tutorial with Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(3), 448–469. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1522591
- Lin, C., Hu, W., Adey, P., & Shen, J. (2003). The Influence of CASE on scientific creativity. Research in Science Education, 33(2), 143–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025078600616
- Little, T. D., Preacher, K. J., Selig, J. P., & Card, N. A. (2007). New developments in latent variable panel analyses of longitudinal data. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(4), 357–365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407077757
- Lucas, G. J. M., van der Wijst, A., Curşeu, P. L., & Looman, W. M. (2013). An evaluation of alternative ways of computing the creativity quotient in a design school sample. Creativity Research Journal, 25(3), 348–355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.813811
- MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 293–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/23044045
- Marope, M., Griffin, P., & Gallagher, C. (2017). Future competences and the future of curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/news/document-future-competences-and-future-curriculum
- Mayer, R. E. (1999). Problem soving. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity Vol. 1 (Vol. 2, pp. 437–447). San Diego, California: Academic Press.
- McArdle, J. J. (2009). Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 577–605. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163612
- McComas, W. F., & Olson, J. K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education (pp. 41–52). Springer.
- McComas, W.F., Almazroa, H. & Clough, M.P. (1998). The nature of science in science education: An introduction. Science & Education, 7(6), 511–532. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008642510402
- McKay, A. S., Karwowski, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Measuring the muses: Validating the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(2), 216–230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000074
- Miller, A. I. (2000). METAPHOR AND SCIENTIFIC CREATIVITY. In F. Hallyn (Ed.), Metaphor and analogy in the sciences (pp. 147–164). Springer.
- Mukhopadhyay, R., & Sen, M. K. (2013). Scientific creativity- A new emerging field of research: Some considerations. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research, 2, 1–9.
- Mumford, M. D., Connelly, M. S., Scott, G., Espejo, J., Sohl, L. M., Hunter, S. T., & Bedell, K. E. (2005). Career experiences and scientific performance: A study of social, physical, life, and health sciences. Creativity Research Journal, 17(23), 105–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2005.9651474
- Mumford, M. D., & McIntosh, T. (2017). Creative thinking processes: The past and the future. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(4), 317–322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.197
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (19982017). Mplus user’s guide. (Eight edition.), Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
- Newton, L. D. (2010). Creativity in science and science education: A response to Ghassib. Gifted and Talented International, 25(1), 107–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2010.11673560
- OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: Creative problem solving: Students’ skills in tackling real-life problems (volume V). Author.
- Ozdemir, G., & Dikici, A. (2017). Relationships between scientific process skills and scientific creativity: Mediating role of nature of science knowledge. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 3(1), 52–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.275696
- Pacheco, C. S., & Herrera, C. I. (2021). A conceptual proposal and operational definitions of the cognitive processes of complex thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100794. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100794
- Paek, S. H., Park, H., Runco, M. A., & Choe, H.-S. (2016). The contribution of ideational behavior to creative extracurricular activities. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 144–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1162547
- Plucker, J. A., Makel, & Matthew, C. (2010). Assessment of Creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 48–73). New York: Cambridge university press.
- Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
- Raykov, T., Marcoulides, G. A., Menold, N., Li, T., & Zhang, M. (2019). On examining intervention effects upon ability development using latent variable modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(2), 291–301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1485494
- Reiter-Palmon, R. (2011). Problem Finding. In S. R. Pritzker & M. A. Runco (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity. (Vol. 2, 2nd, pp. 250–253). Academic Press/Elsevier.
- Reiter-Palmon, R., Forthmann, B., & Barbot, B. (2019). Scoring divergent thinking tests: A review and systematic framework. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 144–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000227
- Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 657–687. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502
- Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development and practice. New York: Academic Press.
- Runco, M. A. (2010). Divergent thinking, creativity and ideation. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 413–446). New York: Cambridge university press.
- Runco, M. A. (2011). Divergent Thinking. In S. R. Pritzker & M. A. Runco (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity. (Vol. 1, 2nd, pp. 400–403). Academic Press/Elsevier.
- Runco, M. A. (2020a). Creativity Testing Services. Retrieved from https://www.creativitytestingservices.com/
- Runco, M. A. (2020b). Divergent thinking. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (3rd ed., pp. 356–361). Academic Press.
- Runco, M. A., Abdulla, A. M., Paek, S. H., Al-Jasim, F. A., & Alsuwaidi, H. N. (2016). Which test of divergent thinking is best? Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, 3(1), 4–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2016-0001
- Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
- Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
- Said-Metwaly, S., Fernández-Castilla, B., Kyndt, E., & van den Noortgate, W. (2020). Testing conditions and creative performance: Meta-analyses of the impact of time limits and instructions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(1), 15–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000244
- Sak, U., & Ayas, M. B. (2013). Creative Scientific Ability Test (C-SAT): A new measure of scientific creativity. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 55, 316–329.
- Sanchez-Ruiz, M.-J., Santos, M. R., & Jiménez, J. J. (2013). The role of metaphorical thinking in the creativity of scientific discourse. Creativity Research Journal, 25(4), 361–368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.843316
- Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Search browse recent searches my list my psycnet evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8, 23–74.
- Schiffl, I. (2016). Die situation naturwissenschaftlicher bildungsstandards in österreich am beispiel der biologie [The situation of science education standards in austria on the example of biology]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Biologie, 20, 44–61.
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
- Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., … Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 68–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.68
- Snyder, A., Mitchell, J., Bossomaier, T., & Pallier, G. (2004). The creativity quotient: An objective scoring of ideational fluency. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 415–419. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410409534552
- Stapleton, L. M., Yang, J. S., & Hancock, G. R. (2016). Construct meaning in multilevel settings. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 41(5), 481–520. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998616646200
- Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. The Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 311–322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1953.9712897
- Sternberg, R. J. (2010). Limits on science: A comment on “where does creativity fit into a productivist industrial model of knowledge production?. Gifted and Talented International, 25(1), 21–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2010.11673541
- Sternberg, R. J., Todhunter, R. J. E., Litvak, A., & Sternberg, K. (2020). The relation of scientific creativity and evaluation of scientific impact to scientific reasoning and general intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 8(2), 2. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8020017
- Stoel, R. D., Garre, F. G., Dolan, C., & van den Wittenboer, G. (2006). On the likelihood ratio test in structural equation modeling when parameters are subject to boundary constraints. Psychological Methods, 11(4), 439–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.4.439
- Sun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2020). Effects of divergent thinking training on students’ scientific creativity: The impact of individual creative potential and domain knowledge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100682. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100682
- Thurston, B. J., & Runco, M. A. (1999). Flexibilty. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity Vol. 1 (Vol. 1, pp. 729–732). San Diego, California: Academic Press.
- Tiruneh, D. T., Cock, M. D., Weldeslassie, A. G., Elen, J., & Janssen, R. (2017). Measuring critical thinking in physics: Development and validation of a critical thinking test in electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 663–682. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9723-0
- Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance tests of creativethinking - norms - technical manual: Verbal tests, forms A and B: Figural tests, forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personal Press, Incorporated.
- Torrance, E. P. (2008). The Torrance tests of creative thinking norms - technical manual figural (streamlined) forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
- Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Stead-Dorval, B. K. (2006). Creative problem solving: An introduction (4th ed.), Waco, Texas: Prufrock Press Inc.
- Vries, H. B., & Lubart, T. I. (2019). Scientific creativity: Divergent and convergent thinking and the impact of culture. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(2), 145–155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.184
- Ward, T. B. (2011). Problem Solving. In S. R. Pritzker & M. A. Runco (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity. (Vol. 2, 2nd, pp. 254–260). Academic Press/Elsevier.
- Widaman, K. F., Ferrer, E., & Conger, R. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives, 4(1), 10–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x
- Yang, -K.-K., Lee, L., Hong, Z.-R., & Lin, H.-S. (2016). Investigation of effective strategies for developing creative science thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 38(13), 2133–2151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1230685
- Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity?. Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 24–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.545713
- Zhu, W., Shang, S., Jiang, W., Pei, M., & Su, Y. (2019). Convergent thinking moderates the relationship between divergent thinking and scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 320–328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641685
- Zou, G. Y. (2007). Toward using confidence intervals to compare correlations. Psychological Methods, 12(4), 399–413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.4.399