References
- Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997.
- Amendt-Lyon, N. (2001). Art and creativity in Gestalt therapy. Gestalt Review, 5(4), 225–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.5325/gestaltreview.5.4.0225.
- Arnheim, R. (2013). Kunst und Sehen: Eine Psychologie des schöpferischen Auges [Art and seeing: A psychology of the creative eye]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
- Bat Or, M., & Zilcha-Mano, S. (2018). The art therapy working alliance inventory: The development of a measure. International Journal of Art Therapy, 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17454832.2018.1518989.
- Bauer, H. (1996). Form, Struktur, Stil: Die formanalytischen und formgeschichtlichen Methoden [Form, structure, style: The methods of form analysis and form history]. In H. Belting, H. Dilly, W. Kemp, W. Sauerländer, and M. Warnke (Eds.), Kunstgeschichte: Eine Einführung [Art history: An introduction] (Vol. 6, pp. 157–173). Berlin: Reimer.
- Benjamin, W. (1969). Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit [The artwork in the age of mechanical reproduction] (Vol. 2). Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
- Brown, J. D. (2009). Principal components analysis and exploratory factor analysis: Definitions, differences, and choices. Statistics, 13(1), 26–31.
- Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016.
- Cardinal, R. (2009). Outsider Art and the autistic creator. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1522), 1459–1466. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0325.
- Cattaneo, M. (1994). Addressing culture and values in the training of art therapists. Art Therapy, 11(3), 184–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.1994.10759081.
- Chan, W., Ho, R. M., Leung, K., Chan, D. K.-S., & Yung, Y.-F. (1999). An alternative method for evaluating congruence coefficients with Procrustes rotation: A bootstrap procedure. Psychological Methods, 4(4), 378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.4.378.
- Chatterjee, A., Widick, P., Sternschein, R., Smith, W. B., & Bromberger, B. (2010). The assessment of art attributes. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28(2), 207–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.28.2.f.
- Cliff, N. (1966). Orthogonal rotation to congruence. Psychometrika, 31(1), 33–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289455
- Cohen, B. M., & Mills, A. (2016). The diagnostic drawing series (DDS) at thirty: Art therapy assessment and research. In D. Gussac, & M. L. Rosal (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of art therapy (pp. 558–568).
- Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
- Commare, L., Rosenberg, R., & Leder, H. (2018). More than the sum of its parts: Perceiving complexity in painting. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(4), 380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000186.
- Coster, J. D. (2012). Converting effect sizes. http://www.stat-help.com/spreadsheets.html
- Cropley, D. H., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Measuring functional creativity: Non‐expert raters and the creative solution diagnosis scale. The Journal ofCreative Behavior, 46(2), 119–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.9.
- Eber, P., Müller, S., Bader, R., & Baukus, P. (1998). Die nürtinger beurteilungsskala zur einschätzung von patientenbildern im therapieverlauf [The Nürtinger Rating Scale for evaluating pictures of patients in the therapeutic process]. Fachhochschule für Kunsttherapie Nürtingen.
- Eitel, K., Szkura, L., Pokorny, D., & von Wietersheim, J. (2008). Do you see what I see? A study about the interrater reliability in art therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 18(2), 216–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300701441995.
- Elbing, U., & Hacking, S. (2001). Nürtinger Beurteilungsskala und Diagnostic Assessment of Psychiatric Art: Neue Wege zur Evaluation der Bilder von Kunsttherapie-Patienten [Nürtinger Rating Scale and Diagnostic Assessment of Psychiatric Art: New ways of evaluating pictures of art therapy patients]. Musik-, Tanz- und Kunsttherapie, 12(3), 133–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1026//0933-6885.12.3.133.
- Elbing, U., Hölzer, M., Danner-Weinberger, A., & von Wietersheim, J. (2009). Reliabilität und Validität des Instruments DoKuPro: Dokumentation Kunsttherapeutischer Prozesse erste Ergebnisse [Reliability and validity of the instrument, DokuPro: Documentation of art therapeutic processes]. Musik-, Tanz und Kunsttherapie, 20(1), 1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1026/0933-6885.20.1.1.
- Elbing, U., & Hölzer, M. (2007). Entwicklung und erste Evaluation eines Instruments zur kunst- und gestaltungstherapeutischen Prozessdokumentation [Development and first evaluation of an instrument for art and gestalt therapeutic process documentation]. Musik-, Tanz und Kunsttherapie, 18(2), 85–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1026/0933-6885.18.2.85.
- Epstein, C. (2019). Bildlicher Ausdruck von Depression: Erprobung des Ratinginstruments RizbA an Bildstichproben aus dem klinischen Kunsttherapiesetting [Pictorial expression of depression: Testing the ratinginstrument RizbA on image samples from a clinical art therapy setting]. Zenodo, Germany: Witten/Herdecke University. doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3365921.
- Fechner, G. T. (1876). Vorschule der Ästhetik [Preschool of aesthetics] (Vol. 1). Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.
- Fetz, K., Vogt, H., Ostermann, T., Schmitz, A., & Schulz-Quach, C. (2018). Evaluation of the palliative symptom burden score (PSBS) in a specialised palliative care unit of a university medical centre-a longitudinal study. BMC Palliative Care, 17(1), 92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0342-0.
- Fisher, R. (2012). How to do procrustean factor rotation. Retrieved from https://culturemindspace.blogspot.com/2012/03/how-to-do-procrustean-factor-rotation.html
- Furr, R. M. (2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1267–1316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00521.x.
- Gantt, L. M., & Anderson, F. (2009). The formal elements art therapy scale: A measurement system for global variables in art. Art Therapy, 26(3), 124–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07421656.2009.10129372.
- Gantt, L. (2016). The formal elements art therapy scale (FEATS). In D. Gussac, & M. L. Rosal (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of art therapy (pp. 569–578) . Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwel.
- Gigerenzer, G. (2010). Personal reflections on theory and psychology. Theory & Psychology, 20(6), 733–743. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310378184.
- Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029528.
- Gridley, M. C. (2006). Concrete and abstract thinking styles and art preferences in a sample of serious art collectors. Psychological Reports, 98(3), 853–857. doi:https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.98.3.853-857.
- Gridley, M. C. (2013). Preference for abstract art according to thinking styles and personality. North American Journal of Psychology, 15(3), 463–481.
- Gruber, H., Frieling, E., & Weis, J. (2002). Kunsttherapie: Entwicklung und Evaluierung eines Beobachtungsinstruments zur systematischen Analyse von Patientenbildern aus der Onkologie und der Rheumatologie [Art therapy: Development and evaluation of a observational instrument for the systematic analysis of pictures by patients in oncology and rheumatology]. Complementary Medicine Research, 9(3), 138–146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000064263.
- Guadagnoli, E., & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 265–275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265.
- Hacking, S., Foreman, D., & Belcher, J. (1996). The descriptive assessment for psychiatric art: A new way of quantifying paintings by psychiatric patients. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 185(7), 425–430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-199607000-00005.
- Hayn-Leichsenring, G. U., Kenett, Y. N., Schulz, K., & Chatterjee, A. (2020). Abstract art paintings, global image properties, and verbal descriptions: An empirical and computational investigation. Acta psychologica, 202, 102936. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102936.
- Helmstadter, G. C. (1957). An empirical comparison of methods for estimating profile similarity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 17(1), 71–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001316445701700105.
- Huber, H. D. (2005). Systemische Bildwissenschaft [Systemic visual culture]. In K. Sachs-Hombach (Ed.), Bildwissenschaft zwischen Reflexion und Anwendung [Visual culture between reflexion and application]. Köln: Von Halem.
- Janßen, B. (2018). Erprobung des Ratinginstruments für zweidimensionale bildnerische Arbeiten (RizbA): Ansatz zu einer möglichen Untersuchung des bildnerischen Ausdrucks von Schmerz in gemalten Bildern von Menschen mit chronischer Schmerzsymptomatik [Testing the rating instrument for two-dimensional pictorial works (RizbA): Pilot study for investigating pictorial expression in pictures painted by people with chronic pain symptoms]. Zenodo, Germany: HKS – University of Applied Sciences and Arts Ottersberg. doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3407808.
- Jerusalem, J. L. L. (2020, February 20). Rizba für alle: Überprüfung der Einsatzmöglichkeiten eines Ratinginstruments für zweidimensionale bildnerische Arbeiten (RizbA) und des neu dazu erstellten Manuals [Rizba for everyone: Review of the possible uses of a rating instrument for two-dimensional pictorial works (RizbA) and the newly created manual] (Unpublished but available via a repository). Witten/Herdecke University. Open Science Framework, Germany. https://osf.io/nsw49
- Kampylis, P. G., & Valtanen, J. (2010). Redefining creativity: Analyzing definitions, collocations, and consequences. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 44(3), 191–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01333.x.
- Kandinsky, W. (1955). Punkt und Linie zu Fläche: Beitrag zur Analyse der malerischen Elemente [Point and Line to Plane: Contribution to the analysis of pictorial elements]. Bern: Benteli.
- Kim, S.-I., Bae, J., & Lee, Y. (2007). A computer system to rate the color-related formal elements in art therapy assessments. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 34(3), 223–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2007.02.002.
- LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642.
- Leder, H., Gerger, G., Dressler, S. G., & Schabmann, A. (2012). How art is appreciated. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 2–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026396.
- Leder, H., Tinio, P. P., Brieber, D., Kröner, T., Jacobsen, T., & Rosenberg, R. (2018). Symmetry is not a universal law of beauty. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237418777941.
- Leiner, D. (2018). SoSci Survey. Retrieved from https://www.soscisurvey.de
- Levine, T. R., & Hullett, C. R. (2002). Eta squared, partial eta squared, and misreporting of effect size in communication research. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 612–625. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00828.x.
- Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ten Berge, J. M. (2006). Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2(2), 57–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-1881.2.2.57.
- Machotka, P. (2012). Understanding aesthetic and creative processes: The complementarity of idiographic and nomothetic data. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 43–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025243.
- Marotzki, W., & Stoetzer, K. (2006). Die Geschichten hinter den Bildern: Annäherungen an eine Methode und Methodologie der Bildinterpretation in biografie- und bildungstheoretischer Absicht [The stories behind the pictures: Approaches to a method and methodology of image interpretation in biography and educational theory]. In M. Winfried, and N. Horst (Eds.), Bildinterpretation und Bildverstehen: Methodische Ansätze aus sozialwissenschaftlicher, kunst- und medienpädagogischer Perspektive [Image interpretation and image understanding: Methodological approaches from a socioscientific, artistic and media educational perspective]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
- Martindale, C. (2007). Recent trends in the psychological study of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 25(2), 121–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/B637-1041-2635-16NN.
- Mastandrea, S., & Crano, W. D. (2019). Peripheral factors affecting the evaluation of artworks. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 37(1), 82–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237418790916.
- Mattson, D. C. (2009). Accessible image analysis for art assessment. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 36(4), 208–213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2009.03.003.
- Mattson, D. C. (2010). Issues in computerized art therapy assessment. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 37(4), 328–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2010.05.008.
- Mattson, D. C. (2011). Standardizing the formal elements art therapy scale (FEATS) rotation scale with computerized technology: A pilot study. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 38(2), 120–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2011.02.003.
- McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T., Jr, Bond, M. H., & Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 552. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.552.
- McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30.
- Meskin, A., Phelan, M., Moore, M., & Kieran, M. (2013). Mere exposure to bad art. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 53(2), 139–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ays060.
- Meyer, G. (2011). Sprache der Bilder: Kunst verstehen: Form, Farbe, Komposition [Language of the pictures: Understanding art: Shape, color, composition]. Leipzig: Seemann.
- Mills, A. (2003). The diagnostic drawing series. In Handbook of art therapy (pp. 401–409).
- Moosbrugger, H., & Kelava, A. (2007). Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion [Test theory and questionnaire design] (2 ed.). Springer.
- Mosquera, G. (1992). The Marco Polo syndrome: Some problems around art and Eurocentrism. Third Text, 6(21), 35–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09528829208576382.
- North, A. C., & Hargreaves, D. J. (1996). Affective and evaluative responses to the arts. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 14(2), 207–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/YQYH-XVMN-21EA-94AC.
- O’Connor, B. P. (2018). SPSS, SAS, and MATLAB programs for determining the number of components and factors using parallel analysis and velicer’s MAP test. University of Columbia. Retrieved from https://people.ok.ubc.ca/brioconn/nfactors/nfactors.html
- O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32(3), 396–402. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200807.
- Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(11), 8.
- Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2009). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pan-Pacific Management Review, 12(2), 131–146.
- Pelowski, M., Markey, P. S., Forster, M., Gerger, G., & Leder, H. (2017). Move me, astonish me … delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna integrated model of top-down and bottom-up processes in art perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 80–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003.
- Penn Center for Neuroaesthetics. (2019). Resources. University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from https://neuroaesthetics.med.upenn.edu/research.html#resources
- Penzes, I., Hooren, S. V., Dokter, D., & Hutschemaekers, G. (2018). How art therapists observe mental health using formal elements in art products: Structure and variation as indicators for imbalance and adaptability. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1611. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01611.
- Pöge, A. (2011). Persönliche Codes bei Längsschnittuntersuchungen III: Fehlertolerante Zuordnung unverschlüsselter und verschlüsselter selbstgenerierter Codes im empirischen Test [Personal codes in longitudinal designs III: Fault-tolerant assignment of unencrypted and crypted self-generated codes in the empirical test]. Methoden, Daten, Analysen (mda), 5(1), 109–134.
- Raykov, T., & Little, T. D. (1999). A note on procrustean rotation in exploratory factor analysis: A computer intensive approach to goodness-of-fit evaluation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1), 47–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164499591004.
- Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.
- Said-Metwaly, S., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Approaches to measuring creativity: A systematic literature review. Creativity: Theories – Research – Applications, 4(2), 238–275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0013.
- Schneider, N. (2017). Geschichte der Ästhetik von der Aufklärung bis zur Postmoderne: Eine paradigmatische Einführung [The history of aesthetics from enlightment to post-modernity: A paradigmatic introduction] (6 ed.). Stuttgart: Reclam.
- Schoch, K., Gruber, H., & Ostermann, T. (2017). Measuring art: Methodical development of a quantitative rating instrument measuring pictorial expression (RizbA). The Arts in Psychotherapy, 55, 73–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2017.04.014.
- Schönemann, P. H. (1966). A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem. Psychometrika, 31(1), 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289451.
- Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420.
- Silvia, P. J. (2007). An introduction to multilevel modeling for research on the psychology of art and creativity. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 25(1), 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/6780-361T-3J83-04L1.
- Specht, S. M. (2007). Successive contrast effects for judgments of abstraction in artwork following minimal pre-exposure. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 25(1), 63–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/W717-88W2-2233-12H3.
- Streb, J. H. (1984). Thoughts on phenomenology, education, and art. Studies in Art Education, 25(3), 159–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.1984.11650370.
- Stuhler-Bauer, A., & Elbing, U. (2003). Die phänomenologische Bilderfassung: Ein kunsttherapeutisches Instrument [The phenomenological picture survey: An art therapeutic instrument]. Musik-, Tanz- und Kunsttherapie, 14(1), 32–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1026//0933-6885.14.1.32.
- Stuhler-Bauer, A., & Elbing, U. (2004). Kritik standardisierter empirischer Bilderfassung aus kunsttherapeutisch-phänomenologischer Sicht: Die Nürtinger Beurteilungsskala und die Diagnostic Assessment of Psychiatric Art, deutsche Version [Review on standardized empirical picture analysis from an art therapeutic phenomenological view: The Nürtinger Rating Scale and the Diagnostic Assessment of Psychiatric Art, German version]. Musik-, Tanz- und Kunsttherapie, 15(1), 5–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1026/0933-6885.15.1.5.
- Suhr, D. D. (2005). Principal component analysis vs. exploratory factor analysis. Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual SAS® Users Group International Conference, University of Northern Colorado, 203, 30. Retrieved from http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi30/203-30.pdf
- Suhr, D. D. (2006). Exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis? Statistics and Data Analysis, 31, 66–76.
- Tansella, C. (2007). The long and winding journey of Outsider Art. An historical perspective. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 16(2), 133–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1121189X00004759.
- Thyme, K. E., Wiberg, B., Lundman, B., & Graneheim, U. H. (2013). Qualitative content analysis in art psychotherapy research: Concepts, procedures, and measures to reveal the latent meaning in pictures and the words attached to the pictures. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 40(1), 101–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2012.11.007.
- Tinio, P. P. (2013). From artistic creation to aesthetic reception: The mirror model of art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 265–275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030872.
- Tröndle, M., & Tschacher, W. (2012). The physiology of phenomenology: The effects of artworks. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 30(1), 75–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.30.1.g.
- Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170.
- Uzelac, M. (1998). Art and phenomenology in Edmund Husserl. Axiomathes, 9(1), 7–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02681700.
- van Buren, B., Bromberger, B., Potts, D., Miller, B., & Chatterjee, A. (2013). Changes in painting styles of two artists with Alzheimer’s disease. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029332.
- Vollmar, K. (2008). Die faszinierende Welt der Farben: Ein Glossar von A-Z [The fascinating world of colors: A glossary of A-Z]. Witten: ars momentum.
- Walter, S., Eliasziw, M., & Donner, A. (1998). Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 17(1), 101–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::AID-SIM727>3.0.CO;2-E.
- Wiesing, L. (2005). Methoden der Bildwissenschaft [Methods of visual culture]. In K. Sachs-Hombach (Ed.), Bildwissenschaft zwischen Reflexion und Anwendung [Visual culture between reflexion and application] (pp. 144–154). Köln: Von Halem.
- Wünsch, K. L. (2016). Comparing two groups’ factor structures: Pearson r and the coefficient of congruence. Retrieved from http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/MV/FA/FactorStructure-TwoGroups.docx
- Zaidel, D. W., Nadal, M., Flexas, A., & Munar, E. (2013). An evolutionary approach to art and aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028797.
- Zumbo, B. D., Sireci, S. G., & Hambleton, R. K. (2003). Re-visiting exploratory methods for construct comparability: Is there something to be gained from the ways of old. Annual Meeting of the National Council for Measurement in Education (NCME), Chicago, Illinois