References
- Arendt, H. (2013). The human condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Axelrod, R. (1997). Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. In R. Conte, R. Hegselmann, and P. Terna (Eds.), Simulating social phenomena (pp. 21–40). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.
- Boden, M. A. (1994). Précis of the creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17(3), 519–531. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0003569X
- Boghossian, P., & Peacocke, C. (2000). New essays on the a priori. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
- Calder, M., Craig, C., Culley, D., de Cani, R., Donnelly, C. A., Douglas, R., … Wilson, A. (2018). Computational modelling for decision-making: Where, why, what, who and how. Royal Society Open Science, 5, 172096. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.172096
- Carley, K. M. (2019). Social-behavioral simulation: Key challenges. In P. K. Davis, A. O’Mahony, & J. Pfautz (Eds.), Social‐behavioral modeling for complex systems (pp. 741–752). John Wiley & Sons Inc. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119485001.ch32
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The systems model of creativity: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
- Davis, P. K., & O’Mahony, A. (2019). Improving social-behavioral modeling. In P. K. Davis, A. O’Mahony, and J. Pfautz (Eds.), Social-behavioral modeling for complex systems (pp. 15–48). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- Dennett, D. C. (2013). Intuition pumps and other tools for thinking. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
- Dietrich, A. (2007, May 1). Who’s afraid of a cognitive neuroscience of creativity? Methods, 42(1), 22–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.12.009
- Elsbach, K. D., & Flynn, F. J. (2013, June 1). Creative collaboration and the self-concept: A study of toy designers. Journal of Management Studies, 50(4), 515–544. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12024
- Epstein, J. (1999). Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity, 4(5), 41–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0526(199905/06)4:5<41::AID-CPLX9>3.0.CO;2-F
- Gero, J. S., & Sosa, R. (2002). Creative design situations: Artificial creativity in communities of design agents. Cyberjaya, Malaysia: Computer-Aided Architecture Design Research in Asia CAADRIA.
- Gilbert, N., & Ahrweiler, P. (2009). The epistemologies of social simulation research. In F. Squazzoni (Ed.), Epistemological aspects of computer simulation in the social sciences. EPOS 2006. Lecture notes in computer Science (Vol. 5466). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01109-2_2
- Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1992, July 1). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16(3), 395–429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(92)90038-V
- Hofstadter, D. R. (1995). Fluid concepts & creative analogies: Computer models of the fundamental mechanisms of thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Jackson, J. C., Rand, D., Lewis, K., Norton, M. I., & Gray, K. (2017). Agent-based modeling: A guide for social psychologists. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 387–395. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617691100
- Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
- Kitcher, P. (2000). A priori knowledge revisited. In P. Boghossian, and C. Peacocke (Eds.), New essays on the a priori (pp. 65–91). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
- Merrotsy, P. (2013, October 1). A note on Big-C creativity and little-c creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25(4), 474–476. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.843921
- Mumford, M. D., Hunter, S. T., & Bedell-Avers, K. E. (2008). Multi-level issues in creativity and innovation (Vol. 7). Oxford, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Mumford, M. D. (1995, October 1). Situational influences on creative achievement: Attributions or interactions? Creativity Research Journal, 8(4), 405–412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0804_7
- O’Donovan, P., Agarwala, A., & Hertzmann, A. (2011). Color compatibility from large datasets. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 30(4), 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2010324.1964958
- O’Donovan, P. (2015). Learning design: Aesthetic models for color, layout, and typography (PhD dissertation). University of Toronto, Canada.
- Parkhurst, C., & Feller, R. L. (1982). Who invented the color wheel? Color Research and Application, 7(3), 217–230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/col.5080070302
- Rangoni, R. (2014). From informal thought experiments to agent-based models a progressive account of modeling in the social sciences. In L. Magnani (Ed.), Model-based reasoning in science and technology. Studies in applied philosophy, epistemology and rational ethics (Vol. 8, pp. 471–478). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37428-9_26
- Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012, January 1). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
- Runco, M. A. (2014). “Big C, little c” creativity as a false dichotomy: Reality is not categorical. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 131–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.873676
- Runco, M. A. (2008). Creativity research should be a social science. In M. D. Mumford, S. T. Hunter, & K. E. Bedell-Avers (Eds.), Multi-level issues in creativity and innovation (research in multi-level issues) (Vol. 7, pp. 75–94). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-9144(07)00003-3
- Salvatore, S., & Valsiner, J. (2010). Between the general and the unique: Overcoming the nomothetic versus idiographic opposition. Theory & Psychology, 20(6), 817–833. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310381156
- Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Simonton, D. K. (2017). Big-C versus little-c creativity: Definitions, implications, and inherent educational contradictions. In R. A. Beghetto & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creative contradictions in education: Cross disciplinary paradoxes and perspectives (pp. 3–19). Springer International Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21924-0_1
- Sosa, R., & Gero, J. S. (2016, January 2). Multi-dimensional creativity: A computational perspective. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 4(1), 26–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2015.1026941
- Sternberg, R. J. (2018). What’s wrong with creativity testing? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(1), 121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.237
- Sun, Z., Lorscheid, I., Millington, J. D., Lauf, S., Magliocca, N. R., Groeneveld, J., … Schulze, J. (2016). Simple or complicated agent-based models? A complicated issue. Environmental Modelling and Software, 86, 56–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.006
- Vincent, A. S., Decker, B. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2002, April 1). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 163–178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_4
- Weisberg, R. W. (2020). Rethinking creativity: Inside-the-box thinking as the basis for innovation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Wiltschnig, S., Christensen, B. T., & Ball, L. J. (2013, September 1). Collaborative problem–solution co-evolution in creative design. Design Studies, 34(5), 515–542. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.01.002