References
- Acar, S., Abdulla Alabbasi, A. M., Runco, M. A., & Beketayev, K. (2019). Latency as a predictor of originality in divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100574. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100574
- Acar, S., Runco, M. A., & Park, H. (2020). What should people be told when they take a divergent thinking test? A meta-analytic review of explicit instructions for divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(1), 39–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000256
- Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997
- Azur, M. J., Stuart, E. A., Frangakis, C., & Leaf, P. J. (2011). Multiple imputation by chained equations: What is it and how does it work?: Multiple imputation by chained equations. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 20(1), 40–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.329
- Bai, H., Leseman, P. P. M., Moerbeek, M., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Mulder, H. (2021). Serial order effect in divergent thinking in five- to six-year-olds: Individual differences as related to executive functions. Journal of Intelligence, 9(2), 20. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9020020
- Bai, H., Mulder, H., Moerbeek, M., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2021). Divergent thinking in four-year-old children: An analysis of thinking processes in performing the alternative uses task. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 100814. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100814
- Barbot, B. (2018). The dynamics of creative ideation: Introducing a new assessment paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02529
- Baroni, M., Dinu, G., & Kruszewski, G. (2014). Don’t count, predict! A systematic comparison of context-counting vs. context-predicting semantic vectors. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Baltimore, Maryland: (pp. 238–247). doi:https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P14-1023
- Batey, M. (2007). A psychometric investigation of everyday creativity. London, England: University of Londong.
- Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Barry Kaufman, S., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 10964. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10964
- Beaty, R. E., Christensen, A. P., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2017). Creative constraints: Brain activity and network dynamics underlying semantic interference during idea production. NeuroImage, 148, 189–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.012
- Beaty, R. E., & Johnson, D. R. (2021). Automating creativity assessment with SemDis: An open platform for computing semantic distance. Behavior Research Methods, 53(2), 757–780. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01453-w
- Beaty, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., Christensen, A. P., Rosenberg, M. D., Benedek, M., Chen, Q., … Silvia, P. J. (2018). Robust prediction of individual creative ability from brain functional connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(5), 1087–1092. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713532115
- Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P., Nusbaum, E., Jauk, E., & Benedek, M. (2014). The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory & Cognition, 42(7), 1186–1197. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0428-8
- Beaty, R. E., Zeitlen, D. C., Baker, B. S., & Kenett, Y. N. (2021). Forward flow and creative thought: Assessing associative cognition and its role in divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100859. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100859
- Beisemann, M., Forthmann, B., Bürkner, P.-C., & Holling, H. (2019). Psychometric evaluation of an alternate scoring for the remote associates test. The Journal of Creative Behavior. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.394
- Benedek, M., Christensen, A. P., Fink, A., & Beaty, R. E. (2019). Creativity assessment in neuroscience research. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 218–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000215
- Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. NeuroImage, 88, 125–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.021
- Benedek, M., Mühlmann, C., Jauk, E., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Assessment of divergent thinking by means of the subjective top-scoring method: Effects of the number of top-ideas and time-on-task on reliability and validity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 341–349. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033644
- Bollen, K. A. (1980). Issues in the comparative measurement of political democracy. American Sociological Review, 45(3), 370. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2095172
- Cureton, E. E. (1966). Corrected item-test correlations. Psychometrika, 31(1), 93–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289461
- DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880
- Dumas, D., Doherty, M., & Organisciak, P. (2020). The psychology of professional and student actors: Creativity, personality, and motivation. PLOS ONE, 15(10), e0240728. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240728
- Dumas, D., & Dunbar, K. N. (2014). Understanding fluency and originality: A latent variable perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 56–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.09.003
- Dumas, D., Organisciak, P., & Doherty, M. (2020a). Measuring divergent thinking originality with human raters and text-mining models: A psychometric comparison of methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(3), 412–425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000319
- Fink, A., Grabner, R. H., Benedek, M., Reishofer, G., Hauswirth, V., Fally, M., … Neubauer, A. C. (2009). The creative brain: Investigation of brain activity during creative problem solving by means of EEG and FMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 30(3), 734–748. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20538
- Forthmann, B., Gerwig, A., Holling, H., Celik, P., Storme, M., & Lubart, T. (2016). The be-creative effect in divergent thinking: The interplay of instruction and object frequency. Intelligence, 57, 25–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.03.005
- Forthmann, B., Holling, H., Çelik, P., Storme, M., & Lubart, T. (2017). Typing speed as a confounding variable and the measurement of quality in divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 29(3), 257–269. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1360059
- Forthmann, B., Holling, H., Zandi, N., Gerwig, A., Çelik, P., Storme, M., & Lubart, T. (2017). Missing creativity: The effect of cognitive workload on rater (dis-)agreement in subjective divergent-thinking scores. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 129–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.12.005
- Forthmann, B., Lips, C., Szardenings, C., Scharfen, J., & Holling, H. (2020). Are speedy brains needed when divergent thinking is speeded—or unspeeded? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(1), 123–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.350
- Forthmann, B., Oyebade, O., Ojo, A., Günther, F., & Holling, H. (2019). Application of latent semantic analysis to divergent thinking is biased by elaboration. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(4), 559–575. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.240
- Forthmann, B., Szardenings, C., & Dumas, D. (2020). On the conceptual overlap between the fluency contamination effect in divergent thinking scores and the chance view on scientific creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.445
- Forthmann, B., Szardenings, C., & Holling, H. (2020). Understanding the confounding effect of fluency in divergent thinking scores: Revisiting average scores to quantify artifactual correlation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(1), 94–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000196
- Forthmann, B. (2019). Die Beurteilung von Ideenqualität. In J. S. Haager, and T. G. Baudson (Eds.), Kreativität in der Schule - finden, fördern, leben (pp. 75–95). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22970-2_4
- Frith, E., Kane, M. J., Welhaf, M. S., Christensen, A. P., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2021). Keeping creativity under control: Contributions of attention control and fluid intelligence to divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 33(2), 138–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1855906
- Gray, K., Anderson, S., Chen, E. E., Kelly, J. M., Christian, M. S., Patrick, J., … Lewis, K. (2019). “Forward flow”: A new measure to quantify free thought and predict creativity. American Psychologist, 74(5), 539–554. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000391
- Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Günther, F., Dudschig, C., & Kaup, B. (2015). LSAfun - An R package for computations based on latent semantic analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 930–944. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0529-0
- Hardt, J., Herke, M., & Leonhart, R. (2012). Auxiliary variables in multiple imputation in regression with missing X: A warning against including too many in small sample research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), 184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-184
- Hass, R. W. (2017). Tracking the dynamics of divergent thinking via semantic distance: Analytic methods and theoretical implications. Memory & Cognition, 45(2), 233–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0659-y
- Heinen, D. J. P., & Johnson, D. R. (2018). Semantic distance: An automated measure of creativity that is novel and appropriate. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(2), 144–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000125
- Jamshidian, M., Jalal, S., & Jansen, C. (2014). MissMech : An R package for testing homoscedasticity, multivariate normality, and Missing Completely at Random (MCAR). Journal of Statistical Software, 56(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v056.i06
- Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 95–105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1941
- Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL VII: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: SPSS.
- Karwowski, M. (2011). It doesn’t hurt to ask … But sometimes it hurts to believe: Polish students’ creative self-efficacy and its predictors. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(2), 154–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021427
- Kleinkorres, R., Forthmann, B., & Holling, H. (2021). An experimental approach to investigate the involvement of cognitive load in divergent thinking. Journal of Intelligence, 9(1), 3. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9010003
- Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
- Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2–3), 259–284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545028
- Maio, S., Dumas, D., Organisciak, P., & Runco, M. (2020). Is the reliability of objective originality scores confounded by elaboration? Creativity Research Journal, 32(3), 201–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1818492
- Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting: A review and empirical validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 57–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.04.001
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, Jr., P. T., Jr. (2007). Brief versions of the NEO-PI-3. Journal of Individual Differences, 28(3), 116–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.28.3.116
- Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850
- Newman, D. A. (2014). Missing Data. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 372–411. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114548590
- Paek, S. H., Abdulla, A., Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2021). Is more time better for divergent thinking? A meta-analysis of the time-on-task effect on divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 100894. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100894
- Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014). Glove: Global vectors for word representation. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). New York, NY: (pp. 1532–1543). doi:https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1162
- Prabhakaran, R., Green, A. E., & Gray, J. R. (2014). Thin slices of creativity: Using single-word utterances to assess creative cognition. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 641–659. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0401-7
- R Core Team. (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
- Raykov, T. (2001). Estimation of congeneric scale reliability using covariance structure analysis with nonlinear constraints. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54(2), 315–323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/000711001159582
- Reiter-Palmon, R., Forthmann, B., & Barbot, B. (2019). Scoring divergent thinking tests: A review and systematic framework. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(2), 144–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000227
- Revelle, W. (2020). psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. R package version 2.0.12. https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych
- Robitzsch, A., & Grund, S. (2021). miceadds: Some Additional Multiple Imputation Functions, Especially for “mice.” R package version 3.11-6. https://cran.r-project.org/package=miceadds
- Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2). doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
- Said-Metwaly, S., Fernández-Castilla, B., Kyndt, E., & Van Den Noortgate, W. (2020). Testing conditions and creative performance: Meta-analyses of the impact of time limits and instructions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 14(1), 15–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000244
- Silvia, P. J., Rodriguez, R. M., Beaty, R. E., Frith, E., Kaufman, J. C., Loprinzi, P., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2021). Measuring everyday creativity: A Rasch model analysis of the Biographical Inventory of Creative Behaviors (BICB) scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100797. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100797
- Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., … Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 68–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.68
- van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
- Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
- Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children; a study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. Doha, Qatar: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
- Wilken, A., Forthmann, B., & Holling, H. (2019). Instructions moderate the relationship between creative performance in figural divergent thinking and reasoning capacity. The Journal of Creative Behavior. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.392
- Wilson, R. C., Guilford, J. P., & Christensen, P. R. (1953). The measurement of individual differences in originality. Psychological Bulletin, 50(5), 362–370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060857
- Zarnegar, Z., Hocevar, D., & Michael, W. B. (1988). Components of original thinking in gifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(1), 5–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448804800103
- Zeitlen, D. C., Silvia, P. J., Kane, M. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2021). The creative mind in daily life: Relating cognitive and affective experiences to creative thinking and behavior [ Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University.