References
- An, K., & Cerasi, J. (2017). Who’s afraid of contemporary art?. Thames & Hudson. Retrieved from: www.perlego.com/book/1594694/whos-afraid-of-contemporary-artpdf.
- Augustin, M. D., & Leder, H. (2006). Art expertise: A study of concepts and conceptual spaces. Psychology Science, 48(2), 135–156.
- Augustin, M. D., Leder, H., Hutzler, F., & Carbon, C. C. (2008). Style follows content: On the microgenesis of art perception. Acta Psychologica, 128(1), 127–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.11.006
- Bach, M. (1996). The Freiburg Visual Acuity Test: Automatic measurement of visual acuity. Optometry and Vision Science, 73(1), 49–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199601000-00008
- Barbour, J. L., Harlow, A. J., & Plant, G. T. (1994). Insights into the different exploits of colour in the visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Science, 258, 327–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1994.0181
- Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
- Belke, B., Leder, H., & Augustin, M. D. (2006). Mastering style - Effects of explicit style-related information, art knowledge and affective state on appreciation of abstract paintings. Psychology Science, 48(2), 115–134.
- Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 143–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90007-X
- Bimler, D. L., Snellock, M., & Paramei, G. (2019). Art expertise in construing meaning of representational and abstract artworks. Acta Psychologica, 192, 11–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.012
- Calvo, M. G., & Castillo, M. D. (2001). Selective interpretation in anxiety: Uncertainty for threatening events. Cognition and Emotion, 15(3), 299–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930126040
- Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Hsu, B. C., & Swami, A. (2010). Personality predictors of artistic preferences as a function of the emotional valence and perceived complexity of paintings. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(4), 196–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019211
- Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Reimers, S., Hsu, A., & Ahmetoglu, G. (2008). Who art thou? Personality predictors of artistic preferences in a large UK sample: The importance of openness. British Journal of Psychology, 00, 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X366867
- Chirumbolo, A., Brizi, A., Mastandrea, S., and Mannetti, L. (2014). ‘Beauty is no quality in things themselves’: Epistemic motivation affects implicit preferences for art. PLoS One, 9(10), e110323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110323.eCollection2014
- Cleridou, K., & Furnham, A. (2014). Personality correlates of aesthetic preferences for art, architecture, and music. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 32(2), 231–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.32.2.f
- Cooper, J. M., & Silvia, P. J. (2009). Opposing art: Rejection as an action tendency of hostile aesthetic emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27(1), 109–126. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.27.1.f
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PIR) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Cupchik, G. C. (1992). From perception to production: A multilevel analysis of the aesthetic process. In G. C. Cupchik & J. László (Eds.), Emerging visions of the aesthetic process: Psychology, semiology, and philosophy (pp. 83–99). Cambridge University Press.
- Cupchik, G. C. (2002). The evolution of psychical distance as an aesthetic concept. Culture Psychology, 8(2), 155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X02008002437
- Cupchik, G. C., & Gebotys, R. J. (1988). The search for meaning in art: Interpretive styles and judgments of quality. Vis Arts Res, 14, 38–50.
- Fayn, K., MacCann, C., Tiliopoulos, N., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Aesthetic emotions and aesthetic people: Openness predicts sensitivity to novelty in the experiences of interest and pleasure. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(6), 1877. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01877.eCollection2015
- Feist, G. J., & Brady, T. R. (2004). Openness to experience, non-conformity, and the preference for abstract art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22(1), 77–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/Y7CA-TBY6-V7LR-76GK
- Furnham, A., & Walker, J. (2001). Personality and judgements of abstract, pop art, and representational paintings. European Journal of Personality, 15(1), 57–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/per.340
- Ganczarek, J., Pietras, K., & Rosiek, R. (2020). Perceived cognitive challenge predicts eye movements while viewing contemporary paintings. PsyCh Journal,9(4), 490–506. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.365
- Garcia, N. M., & Zoellner, L. A. (2017). Fear generalisation in individuals with high neuroticism: Increasing predictability is not necessarily better. Cognition & Emotion, 31(8), 1647–1662. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1259160
- Gartus, A., & Leder, H. (2014). The white cube of the museum versus the gray cube of the street: The role of context in aesthetic evaluations. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 311–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036847
- Groys, B. (2010). Comrades of Time. In J. Aranda, B. K. Wood, & A. Vidokle (Eds.), What is contemporary art? e-flux journal (Vol. 216, pp. 22–39). Sternberg Press.
- Gude, O. (2004). Postmodern Principles: In search of a 21st art education. Art Education, 57(1), 6–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2004.11653528
- Hadfield, J. D. (2010). Mcmc methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: The MCMCglmm R package. Journal of Statistical Software, 33(2), 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i02
- Hekkert, P. P. M. (1995). Artful Judgements: A psychological inquiry into aesthetic preference for visual patterns. [Doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology] TU Delft Research Repository. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:a7557844-1b6a-446a-a551-54b09bacc66d
- Housen, A. (2001). Eye of the beholder: Research, theory and practice. Visual Understanding in Education.
- Jakesch, M., & Leder, H. (2009). Finding meaning in art: Preferred levels of ambiguity in art appreciation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(11), 2105–2112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903038974
- Jakesch, M., Leder, H., & Forster, M. (2013). Image Ambiguity and Fluency. PLoS ONE 8(9): e74084. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074084
- Koons, J. (2000). Niagara [Painting]. New York, NY: Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum. Retrieved from: https://www.guggenheim.org/artwork/10734
- Kossowska, M., Hanusz, K., & Trejtowicz, M. (2012). Skrócona wersja Skali Potrzeby Poznawczego Domknięcia. Dobór pozycji i walidacja skali [Short version of the need for cognitive closure scale: Items selection and scale validation]. Psychologia Społeczna, 7(1), 89–99.
- Krajewska, A., & Waligórska, A. (2015). Likeable likeness: Personality, experience and preference for abstract and low complexity art. Psychologia, 58(2), 61–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2015.61
- Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, M. D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811
- Leder, H., Gerger, G., Brieber, D., & Schwarz, N. (2014). What makes an art expert? Emotion and evaluation in art appreciation. Cognition & Emotion, 28(6), 1137–1147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.870132
- Leder, H., Gerger, G., Dressler, S. G., & Schabmann, A. (2012). How art is appreciated. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.037/a0026396 Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 2–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026396
- Leder, H., Ring, A., & Dressler, S. G. (2013). See me, feel me! Aesthetic evaluations of art portraits. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 358–369. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033311
- Lommen, M. J. J., Engelhard, I. M., & van den Haut, M. A. (2010). Neuroticism and avoidance of ambiguous stimuli: Better safe than sorry? Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 1001–1006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.012
- Lyssenko, N., Redies, C., & Hayn-Leichsenring, G. U. (2016). Evaluating abstract art: Relation between term usage, subjective ratings, image properties and personality traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(973), 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00973
- Markey, P. S., Jakesch, M., & Leder, H. (2019). Art looks different – Semantic and syntactic processing of paintings and associated neurophysiological brain responses. Brain & Cognition, 134, 58–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.008
- Mastandrea, S., Bartoli, G., & Bove, G. (2009). Preferences for ancient and modern art museums: Visitor experiences and personality characteristics. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 164–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013142
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T, Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509–516. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509
- Mullenix, J. W., & Robinet, J. (2018). Art expertise and the processing of titled abstract art. Perception, 47(4), 359–378. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006617752314
- Muth, C., & Carbon, C. C. (2013). The aesthetic aha: On the pleasure of having insights into gestalt. Acta Psychologica, 144(1), 25–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.001
- Muth, C., Hesslinger, V. M., & Carbon, C. C. (2015). The appeal of challenge in the perception of art: How ambiguity, solvability of ambiguity, and the opportunity for insight affect appreciation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(3), 206–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038814
- Oliver, M. B., & Raney, A. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 984–1004. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x
- Ostrofsky, J., & Shobe, E. (2015). The relationship between need for cognitive closure and the appreciation, understanding, and viewing times of realistic and nonrealistic figurative paintings. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 33(1), 106–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237415570016
- Pelowski, M. (2015). Tears and transformation: Feeling like crying as an indicator of insightful or “aesthetic” experience with art. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1006), 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01006
- Pelowski, M., Forster, M., Tinio, P., Scholl, M., & Leder, H. (2017). Beyond the lab: An examination of key factors influencing interaction with ‘Real’ and Museum-based art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 11(3), 245–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000141
- Pelowski, M., Markey, P. S., Forster, M., Gerger, G., & Leder, H. (2017). Move me, astonish me … delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna Integrated Model of top-down and bottom-up processes in Art Perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 80–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2017.02.003
- Ramachadran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Conscious Studies, 6, 15–51.
- Rawlings, D., Barrantes i Vidal, N., & Furnham, A. (2000). Personality and aesthetic preference in Spain and England: Two studies relating sensation seeking and openness to experience to liking for paintings and music. European Journal of Personality, 14(6), 553–576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0984(200011/12)14:6<553::AID-PER384>3.0.CO;2-H
- Silvia, P. J. (2005). What is interesting? Exploring the appraisal structure of interest. Emotion, 5(1), 89–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.89
- Silvia, P. J. (2009). Looking past pleasure: Anger, confusion, disgust, pride, Surprise, and other unusual aesthetic emotions. Psychology of Aesthetic, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(1), 48–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014632
- Silvia, P. J. (2010). Confusion and interest: The role of knowledge emotions in aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(2), 75–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017081
- Silvia, P. J., & Brown, E. M. (2007). Anger, disgust, and the negative aesthetic emotions: Expanding an appraisal model of aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 1(2), 100–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.100
- Smith, D. B. (2011). My Soul Hath A Remembrance And Is Humbled In Me II [Painting]. London, England: Saatchi Gallery. Retrieved from: https://www.saatchigallery.com/artists/artpages/david_brian_smith_my_soul_hath.htm
- Szymura, B., & Nęcka, E. (2005). Three superfactors of personality and three aspects of attention. In A. Eliasz, S. E. Hampson, & B. De Raad (Eds.), Advances in personality psychology (pp. 65–79). Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
- Van Paasschen, J., Bacci, F., & Melcher, D. P. (2015). The influence of art expertise and training on emotion and preference ratings for representational and abstract artworks. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0134241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134241
- Võ, M. L. H., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. Journal of Vision, 9(3), 24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/9.3.24
- Võ, M. L. H., & Henderson, J. M. (2011). Object-scene inconsistencies do not capture gaze: Evidence from the flash-preview moving-window paradigm. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73(6), 1742–1753. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0150-6
- Võ, M. L. H., & Wolfe, J. M. (2013). Differential electrophysiological signatures of semantic and syntactic scene processing. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1816–1823. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613476955
- Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049
- Wiersema, D. V., Van Der Schalk, J., & van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Who’s afraid of red, yellow, and blue? Need for cognitive closure predicts aesthetic preferences. Psychology of Aesthetic Creativity and Arts, 6(2), 168–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025878
- Winston, A. S., & Cupchik, G. C. (1992). The evaluation of high art and popular art by naive and experienced viewers. Visual Arts Research, 18, 1–14.
- Zawadzki, B., Strelau, J., Szczepaniak, P., & Śliwińska, M. (1998). Inwentarz osobowości NEO-FFI Costy i McCrae (Adaptacja polska – Podręcznik) [NEO-FFI by Costa and McCrae. Polish adaptation – The manual]. Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.