Assistive Technology as a Predictor of General or Alternate Assessment Among Elementary-aged Students With Autism Spectrum Disorders

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
   Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2006). Demographics of preschoolers who require AAC. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 200–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browder, D., Flowers, C., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Karvonen, M., Spooner, F., & Algozzine, R. (2005). How states implement alternate assessments for students with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 15, 209–220.
   Google Scholar
• Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Algozzine, R., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Flowers, C., & Karvonen, M. (2003). What we know and what we need to know about alternate assessment. Exceptional Children, 70,45–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruininks, R. H., Woodcock, R. W., Weatherman, R. F., & Hill, B. K. (1996). Scales of independent behavior-revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Burgstahler, S. (2006). The development of accessibility indicators for distance learning programs. ALT-J Research in Learning Technology, 14(1), 79–102.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 430–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39,175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J., & Behuniak, P. (2011). Assumptions in alternate assessment: An argument-based approach to validation. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 36, 179–191.
   Google Scholar
• Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2010). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomas Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, K. D., & Solcum, T. A. (2005). Using alternate assessment to improve educational outcomes. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24, 24–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hahs-Vaughn, D. L. (2005). A primer for using and understanding weights with national data sets. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73, 221–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahs-Vaughn, D. L. (2006). Analysis of data from complex samples. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 29, 165–183.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, K. L., Morrier, M. J., Heflin, L. J., & Ivey, M. L. (2008). Autism treatment survey: Services received by children with autism spectrum disorders in public school classrooms. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 961–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, J. F., Towels-Reeves, E., Kleinert, H. L., Kleinert, J. O., & Thomas, M. K. K. (2011). Characteristics of and implications for students participating in alternate assessments based on alternate academic achievement standards. Journal of Special Education, 45, 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, D.C., Light, J.C., & Schlosser, R.W. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 248–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2008). MPlus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Quenemoen, R. (2008). A brief history of alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards (Synthesis Report 68). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
   Google Scholar
• Roeber, E. (2002). Setting standards on alternate assessments (Synthesis Report 42). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis42.html
   Google Scholar
• Special Education Elementary Longitudinal Study. (2005). SEELS data documentation and dictionary: Introduction. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Special Education Programs.
   Google Scholar
• Stodden, R. A., Galloway, L. M., & Stodden, N. J. (2003). Secondary school curricula issues: Impact on postsecondary students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 70(1), 9–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Tager-Flusberg, H., Paul, R., & Lord, C. (2005). Language and communication in autism. In F. R. Volkamar, R. Paul., A. Klin, & D. Cohen ( Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders ( pp. 335–364). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, M. L., Lazarus, S. S., Thompson, S. J., & Morse, A. B. (2005). State policies on assessment participation and accommodations for students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 232–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towles-Reeves, E., Kleinert, H., & Muhomba, M. (2009). Alternate assessment: Have we learned anything new? Exceptional Children, 75, 233–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson psychoeducational battery–III (WJ III). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Yell, M. L., Drasgow, E., & Lowrey, K. A. (2005). No child left behind and students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 20, 130–139.
   Google Scholar