Hearing Math: Algebra Supported eText for Students With Visual Impairments

References

• Alajarmeh, N., & Pontelli, E. (2012). A non-visual electronic workspace for learning algebra. In K. Miesenberger, A. Karshmer, P. Penaz, & W. Zagler ( Eds.), ICCHP 2012, Part I, LNCS 7328 ( pp. 158–165). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson-Inman, L. (2009). Supported eText: Literacy scaffolding for students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(3), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson-Inman, L., & Horney, M. (2007). Supported eText: Assistive technology through text transformations. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 153–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson-Inman, L., Terrazas-Arellanes, F. E., & Slabin, U. (2009). Supported eText in captioned videos: A comparison of expanded versus standard captions on student comprehension of educational content. Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(3), 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Angelocci, R. M., & Connors, B. G. (2003). Assessing writing software tools for people with vision impairment, learning disability, and/or low literacy. In K. E. Wolffe (Ed.), Proceedings of the American Foundation for the Bind symposium: A celebration of solutions: National Symposium on literacy for adults with visual disabilities. New York, NY: American Foundation for the Blind. Retrieved from http://www.afb.org/section.aspx?FolderID=3&SectionID=44&TopicID=108&SubTopicID=32&DocumentID=1936
   Google Scholar
• Archambault, D., Caprotti, O., Ranta, A., & Saludes, J. (2012). Using GF in multimodal assistants for mathematics. Digitization and E-Inclusion in Mathematics and Science, 1(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2008). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., Joshi, G. S., Meyer, N. K., & Schleppenbach, D. (2013). Accessing algebra via MathSpeak™: Understanding the potential and pitfalls for students with visual impairments. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28(1), 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Bouck, E., & Meyer, N. (2012). eText, mathematics, and students with visual impairments. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(2), 42–49.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., Lowe, T., & Taylor, M. (2008). Access to mathematics in web resources for people with a visual impairment. Computers Helping People with Special Needs, 5105/2008, 926–933.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research, 38, 813–834.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, T., & Kubiak, E. (1997). Issues and aids for teaching mathematics to the blind. Mathematics Teacher, 90, 344–349.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, R. W., Corn, A., & Siller, M. A. (2006). Trends in Braille and large-print production in the United States: 2000-2004. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 100, 137–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbriet-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 255–284.
   Google Scholar
• Fichten, C. S., Asuncion, J. V., Barile, M., Ferraro, V., & Wolforth, J. (2009). Accessibility of e- learning and computer and information technologies for students with visual impairments in postsecondary education. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103, 543–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedom Scientific. (2013). JAWS for Windows screen reading software. Retrieved from http://www.freedomscientific.com/products/fs/jaws-product-page.asp
   Google Scholar
• Freed, G., & Rothberg, M. (2006). Accessible digital media guidelines. Retrieved from http://ncam.wgbh.org/invent_build/web_multimedia/accessible-digital-media-guide/
   Google Scholar
• gh, LLC. (2006). MathSpeak™. Retrieved from http://www.gh-MathSpeakTM.com
   Google Scholar
• gh, LLC. (2011). ReadHear. Retrieved from http://www.gh-accessibility.com/
   Google Scholar
• Hatlen, P., & Spungin, S. J. (2008). The nature and future of literacy: Point and counterpoint. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102, 389–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday B., Carter, J. A., Casey, R. M., Cuevas, G. J., Hayek, L. M., Luchin B., …Day R. (2008). Algebra 1. Columbus, OH: Glencoe McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Horney, M. A., Anderson-Inman, L., Terrazas-Arellanes, F., Schulte, W., Mundorf, J., Smolkowski, K., … &Frisbee, M. (2009). Exploring the effects of digital notetaking on student comprehension of science texts. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(3), 45–61
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), Amendments of 2004, 20 U.S.C § 1400 et seq. (2004). Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/policy/speced/leg/idea/idea.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Judge, S., & Simms, K. A. (2009). Assistive technology training at the pre-service level: A national snapshot of teacher preparation programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32, 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, S., Russell, M., Gourgey, K., Erin, J. N., Cowan, J. (2003). Use of the talking tactile tablet in mathematics testing. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97, 85–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, M., & Price, E. (1999). An exploration of aspects of language proficiency and algebra learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 449–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center on Accessible Instructional Materials. (2011). What is the National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard (NIMAS)? Retrieved from http://aim.cast.org/learn/policy/federal/what_is_nimas
   Google Scholar
• National Federation of the Blind. (2009). The Braille literacy crisis in America. Baltimore, MD: National Federation for the Blind, Jernigan Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Power, C., & Jürgensen, H. (2010). Accessible presentation of information for people with visual disabilities. Universal Access in the Information Society, 9, 97–119.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M., & Curtis, K. (2011). High school teachers’ perspectives on supporting students with visual impairments toward higher education: Access, barriers, and success. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105, 548–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinman, B. A., Kimbrough, B. T., Johnson, F., & LeJeune, B. J. (2004). Transferring standard English Braille skills to the Unified English Braille code: A pilot study. Re:View, 36, 103–111.
   Google Scholar
• TechSmith® (2012). Camtasia. Retrieved from http://www.techsmith.com/
   Google Scholar
• Toussaint, K. A., & Tiger, J. H. (2010). Teaching early Braille literacy skills within a stimulus equivalence paradigm to children with degenerative visual impairments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 181–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar