Publication Cover
Assistive Technology
The Official Journal of RESNA
Volume 27, 2015 - Issue 1
405
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Adapting a Driving Simulator to Study Pedestrians’ Street-Crossing Decisions: A Feasibility Study

, PhD, , MD, , MD, , MD, PhD & , PhD

References

  • Avineri, E., Shinar, D., & Susilo, Y. O. (2012). Pedestrians’ behaviour in cross walks: the effects of fear of falling and age. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 44(1), 30–34.
  • Bertin, R., Guillot, A., Collet, C., Vienne, F., Espié, S., & Graf, W. (2004). Objective measurement of simulator sickness and the role of visual-vestibular conflict situations: A study with vestibular-loss (a-reflexive) subjects. Society for Neurosciences, 30, 867.
  • Brooke, J. (1996). SUS—A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 194, CRC Press.
  • Brooks, J. O., Goodenough, R. R., Crisler, M. C., Klein, N. D., Alley, R. L., Koon, B. L., … Wills, R. F. (2010). Simulator sickness during driving simulation studies. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(3), 788–796.
  • Classen, S., Bewernitz, M., & Shechtman, O. (2011). Driving simulator sickness: An evidence-based review of the literature. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(2), 179–188.
  • Dommes, A., & Cavallo, V. (2011). The role of perceptual, cognitive, and motor abilities in street-crossing decisions of young and older pedestrians. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 31(3), 292–301.
  • Fisher, D. L., Rizzo, M., Caird, J., & Lee, J. D. (2011). Handbook of driving simulation for engineering, medicine and psychology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Fontaine, H., & Gourlet, Y. (1997). Fatal pedestrian accidents in France: A typological analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 29(3), 303–312.
  • François, M., Morice, A. H., Bootsma, R. J., & Montagne, G. (2011). Visual control of walking velocity. Neuroscience Research, 70(2), 214–219.
  • Gauthier, L., Dehaut, F., & Joanette, Y. (1989). The bells test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11(2), 49–54.
  • Geruschat, D. R., Hassan, S. E., & Turano, K. A. (2003). Gaze behavior while crossing complex intersections. Optometry and Vision Science, 80(7), 515–528.
  • Haegerstrom-Portnoy, G., Schneck, M. E., & Brabyn, J. A. (1999). Seeing into old age: Vision function beyond acuity. Optometry and Vision Science, 76, 141–158.
  • Halligan, P. W., Cockburn, J., & Wilson, B. A. (1991). The behavioural assessment of visual neglect. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 1(1), 5–32.
  • Harrison, C., Grant, P., & Conway, B. (2010). Enhancement of a virtual reality wheelchair simulator to include qualitative and quantitative performance metrics. Assistive Technology, 22(1), 20–31.
  • Hassan, S. E., Geruschat, D. R., & Turano, K. A. (2005). Head movements while crossing streets: Effect of vision impairment. Optometry and Vision Science, 82(1), 18–26.
  • Holland, C., & Hill, R. (2010). Gender differences in factors predicting unsafe crossing decisions in adult pedestrians across the lifespan: A simulation study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(4), 1097–1106.
  • Kim, D. Y., Ku, J., Chang, W. H., Park, T. H., Lim, J. Y., Han, K., … Kim, S. I. (2010). Assessment of post‐stroke extrapersonal neglect using a three-dimensional immersive virtual street crossing program. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 121(3), 171–177.
  • Konstantopoulos, P., Chapman, P., & Crundall, D. (2010). Driver’s visual attention as a function of driving experience and visibility. Using a driving simulator to explore drivers’ eye movements in day, night and rain driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(3), 827–834.
  • Lee, H. C., Cameron, D., & Lee, A. H. (2003). Assessing the driving performance of older adult drivers: On-road versus simulated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35(5), 797–803.
  • Lee, W. Y., Cameron, P. A., & Bailey, M. J. (2006). Road traffic injuries in the elderly. Emergency Medicine Journal, 23(1), 42–46.
  • Li, K. Z., & Lindenberger, U. (2002). Relations between aging sensory/sensorimotor and cognitive functions. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 26(7), 777–783.
  • Lin, C. H., Ou, Y.-K., Wu, R.-M., & Liu, Y.-C. (2013). Predictors of road crossing safety in pedestrians with Parkinson’s disease. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 51, 202–207.
  • Lobjois, R., & Cavallo, V. (2007). Age-related differences in street-crossing decisions: The effects of vehicle speed and time constraints on gap selection in an estimation task. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(5), 934–943.
  • Lobjois, R., & Cavallo, V. (2009). The effects of aging on street-crossing behavior: From estimation to actual crossing. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41(2), 259–267.
  • Lukas, A., & Nikolaus, T. (2009). Driving ability and dementia. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie: Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 42(3), 205.
  • Maltz, M., & Shinar, D. (1999). Eye movements of younger and older drivers. Human Factors, 41(1), 15–25.
  • Martin, A. J., Hand, E. B., Trace, F., & O’Neill, D. (2010). Pedestrian fatalities and injuries involving Irish older people. Gerontology, 56(3), 266–271.
  • McPhee, L. C., Scialfa, C. T., Dennis, W. M., Ho, G., & Caird, J. K. (2004). Age differences in visual search for traffic signs during a simulated conversation. Human Factors, 46(4), 674–685.
  • Mozolic, J. L., Hugenschmidt, C. E., Peiffer, A. M., & Laurienti, P. J. (2012). The neural bases of multisensory processes. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Ostrom, M., & Eriksson, A. (2001). Pedestrian fatalities and alcohol. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 33(2), 173–180.
  • Oxley, J., Fildes, B., Ihsen, E., Charlton, J., & Day, R. (1997). Differences in traffic judgments between young and old adult pedestrians. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 29(6), 839–847.
  • Oxley, J. A., Ihsen, E., Fildes, B. N., Charlton, J. L., & Day, R. H. (2005). Crossing roads safely: An experimental study of age differences in gap selection by pedestrians. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 37(5), 962–971.
  • Peters, D. M., Fritz, S. L., & Krotish, D. E. (2013). Assessing the reliability and validity of a shorter walk test compared with the 10-meter walk test for measurements of gait speed in healthy, older adults. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 36(1), 24–30.
  • Pradhan, A. K., Hammel, K. R., DeRamus, R., Pollatsek, A., Noyce, D. A., & Fisher, D. L. (2005). Using eye movements to evaluate effects of driver age on risk perception in a driving simulator. Human Factors, 47(4), 840–852.
  • Reed, M. P., & Green, P. A. (1999). Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialing task. Ergonomics, 42(8), 1015–1037.
  • Romero-Ortuno, R., Cogan, L., Cunningham, C. U., & Kenny, R. A. (2010). Do older pedestrians have enough time to cross roads in Dublin? A critique of the Traffic Management Guidelines based on clinical research findings. Age and Ageing, 39(1), 80–86.
  • Schenkenberg, T., Bradford, D. C., & Ajax, E. T. (1980). Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology, 30(5), 509–517.
  • Schultheis, M. T., Rebimbas, J., Mourant, R., & Millis, S. R. (2007). Examining the usability of a virtual reality driving simulator. Assistive Technology, 19(1), 1–10.
  • Schwebel, D. C., Gaines, J., & Severson, J. (2008). Validation of virtual reality as a tool to understand and prevent child pedestrian injury. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(4), 1394–1400.
  • Schwebel, D. C., & McClure, L. A. (2010). Using virtual reality to train children in safe street-crossing skills. Injury Prevention, 16(1), 1–5.
  • Slob, J. J. (2008). State-of-the-Art Driving Simulators, a literature survey (DCT 2008.107). Eindhoven, Netherlands: University of Technology. Retrieved Nov 6, 2013, from http://www.mate.tue.nl/mate/pdfs/9611.pdf
  • Thomson, J. A., Tolmie, A. K., Foot, H. C., Whelan, K. M., Sarvary, P., & Morrison, S. (2005). Influence of virtual reality training on the roadside crossing judgments of child pedestrians. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(3), 175–186.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.