Text entry rate of access interfaces used by people with physical disabilities: A systematic review

References

• Anson, D. K. (1997). Alternative computer access: A guide to selection. Philadephia, PA: FA Davis Company.
   Google Scholar
• Anson, D. A., Frame, L., Hopkins, J., Kulmane, L., Streff, P. (2010). Visual Morse: A test of a new paradigm for training Morse code. Proceedings of the RESNA Annual Conference 2010, Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Arthanat, S., Bauer, S. M., Lenker, J. A., Nochajski, S. M., & Wu, Y. W. B. (2007). Conceptualization and measurement of assistive technology usability. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2(4), 235–248. doi:10.1080/17483100701343665
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bay, J. L. (1991). Positioning for Head Control to Access an Augmentative Communication Machine. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(6), 544–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, A. (2016). Utility to combine statistics from multiple groups into one group. StatsToDo. Retrieved from http://www.statstodo.com/ComMeans_Pgm.php
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2015). Assistive technologies: Principles and practice (4th ed.). St Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, C., Vincent, C., & Mazer, B. (2002). Development of a standardized instrument to assess computer task performance. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(1), 60–68. doi:10.5014/ajot.56.1.60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• g.Tec Medical Engineering. (2017). intendiX personal EEG-based speller. Retrieved from http://gtec.at/Products/Complete-Solutions/intendiX-Specs-Features
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., Shane, H., Russell, S., & Caves, K. (2007). Access to AAC: Present, past, and future. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 243–257. doi:10.1080/07434610701571058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, K. (2006). A case study model for augmentative and alternative communication outcomes. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 3(1), 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppestad, B. S. (2006). Essential elements for assessment of persons with severe neurological impairments for computer access utilizing assistive technology devices: A Delphi study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1(1–2), 3–16. doi:10.1080/09638280500167019
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoppestad, B. S. (2013). Current perspective regarding adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities accessing computer technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 8(3), 190–194. doi:10.3109/17483107.2012.723239
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hurlburt, M. (1992). An examination of direct selection typing rate and accuracy. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 29(4), 54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koester, H. H. (2009). Gathering and applying evidence in computer access services. In Proceedings of Association for the Advancement of Assistive Technology (AAATE) 2009 Conference (pp. 234–41). Florence, Italy: RESNA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koester, H. H., Simpson, R. C., Spaeth, D., & LoPresti, E. F. (2007). Reliability and validity of Compass software for access assessment. In Proceedings of the RESNA 30th Annual Conference (RESNA’07), Phoenix, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Law, M., Stewart, D., Pollock, N., Letts, L., Bosch, J., & Westmorland, M. (1998). Guidelines for critical review form—Quantitative studies. McMaster University Occupational Therapy Evidence-Based Practice Research Group. Retrieved from http://srs-mcmaster.ca/research/evidence-based-practice-research-group
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, I. S., & Soukoreff, R. W. (2002). Text entry for mobile computing: Models and methods, theory and practice. Human–Computer Interaction, 17(2–3), 147–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D; the PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Wendt, O., Angermeier, K. L., & Shetty, M. (2005). Searching for evidence in augmentative and alternative communication: Navigating a scattered literature. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(4), 233–255. doi:10.1080/07434610500194813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Wendt, O., & Sigafoos, J. (2007). Not all systematic reviews are created equal: Considerations for appraisal. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1(3), 138–150. doi:10.1080/17489530701560831
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, R., Koester, H. H., & LoPresti, E. (2010). Research in computer access assessment and intervention. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 21(1), 15–32. doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2009.07.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simpson, R. C. (2013). Computer access for people with disabilities: A human factors approach. New York, NY: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trnka, K., McCaw, J., Yarrington, D., & McCoy, K. (2008). Word prediction and communication rate in AAC. In Proceedings of the 4th IASTED International Conference Telehealth and Assistive Technologies (pp. 19–24), Baltimore, MD: ACTA Press.
   Google Scholar

• Alcantud, F., Dolz, I., Gaya, C., & Martín, M. (2006). The voice recognition system as a way of accessing the computer for people with physical standards as usual. Technology & Disability, 18(3), 89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Al Faraj, K., Vigouroux, N., & Mojahid, M. (2009). SmartKey: A multi purpose target expansion based virtual keyboard. In Proceedings of the 11th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 251–252). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1639642.1639700
   Google Scholar
• Blain, S., McKeever, P., & Chau, T. (2010). Bedside computer access for an individual with severe and multiple disabilities: A case study. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 5(5), 359–369. doi:10.3109/17483100903323275
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan, J., Falk, T. H., Teachman, G., Morin-McKee, J., & Chau, T. (2010). Evaluation of a non-invasive vocal cord vibration switch as an alternative access pathway for an individual with hypotonic cerebral palsy—A case study. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 5(1), 69–78. doi:10.3109/17483100903278107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiapparino, C., Stasolla, F., Pace de, C., & Lancioni, G. E. (2011). A touch pad and a scanning keyboard emulator to facilitate writing by a woman with extensive motor disability. Life Span and Disability, 14(1), 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• DeVries, R. C., Deitz, J., & Anson, D. (1998). A comparison of two computer access systems for functional text entry. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(8), 656–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, J. T. (2008). Using speech recognition software to increase writing fluency for individuals with physical disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Hird, K., & Hennessey, N. W. (2007). Facilitating use of speech recognition software for people with disabilities: A comparison of three treatments. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 21(3), 211–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, M., & Luo, C. (1999). Morse code typing training of an adolescent with cerebral palsy using microcomputer technology: Case study. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 15(4), 216–221.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, S. K., Wobbrock, J. O., Harniss, M., & Johnson, K. L. (2008). TrueKeys: Identifying and correcting typing errors for people with motor impairments. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 349–352). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1378773.1378827
   Google Scholar
• Koester, H. H. (1990). Quantitative modeling in augmentative communication—A case study. In RESNA 1990 Annual Conference Retrieved from http://kpronline.com/files/Horstmann-Koester-RESNA1990-modeling-of-an-AAC-system-case-study.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Koester, H. H. (2004). Usage, performance, and satisfaction outcomes for experienced users of automatic speech recognition. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 41(5), 739–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koester, H. H., & Levine, S. P. (1996). Effect of a word prediction feature on user performance. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 12(3), 155–168.
   Google Scholar
• Koester, H. H., Lopresti, E., & Simpson, R. C. (2007). Toward automatic adjustment of keyboard settings for people with physical impairments. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2(5), 261–274. doi:10.1080/17483100701284265
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koester, H. H., & Mankowski, J. (2015). Automatic adjustment of keyboard settings can enhance typing. Assistive Technology, 27(3), 136–146. doi:10.1080/10400435.2014.997899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koester, H. H., & Simpson, R. C. (2014). Method for enhancing text entry rate with single-switch scanning. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 51(6), 995–1012. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2013.09.0201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler, A., & Tam, C. (2002). Effectiveness of using discrete utterance speech recognition software. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 18(3), 137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G., O’Reilly, M., Singh, N., Green, V., Chiapparino, C., De Pace, C., … Stasolla, F. (2010). Use of microswitch technology and a keyboard emulator to support literacy performance of persons with extensive neuro-motor disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13(4), 248–257. doi:10.3109/17518423.2010.485596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Green, V. A., Ferlisi, G., Ferrarese, G., … Oliva, D. (2013). A man with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis uses a mouth pressure microswitch to operate a text messaging system with a word prediction function. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 16(5), 315–320. doi:10.3109/17518423.2012.731086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Green, V., Chiapparino, C., … Oliva, D. (2009). A voice-detecting sensor and a scanning keyboard emulator to support word writing by two boys with extensive motor disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(2), 203–209. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2008.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Green, V., Oliva, D., & Lang, R. (2011). Microswitch and keyboard-emulator technology to facilitate the writing performance of persons with extensive motor disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 576–582. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, C., & O’Leary, S. (1993). Comparison of computer interface devices for persons with severe physical disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 47(11), 1022–1030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, S., Gauger, J., Bowers, L., & Khan, K. (1986). A comparison of mouthstick and Morse code text inputs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2(2), 51–55. doi:10.1080/07434618612331273890
   Google Scholar
• Manaris, B., & Harkreader, A. (1998). SUITEKeys: A speech understanding interface for the motor-control challenged. In Proceedings of the Third International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (pp. 108–115). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/274497.274517
   Google Scholar
• Mankowski, R., Simpson, R. C., & Koester, H. H. (2013). Validating a model of row–column scanning. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 8(4), 321–329. doi:10.3109/17483107.2012.721159
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mezei, P. (2005). Mezei evaluating word prediction software for students with physical disabilities. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 23(2), 93–113.
   Google Scholar
• Mezei, P. (2009). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ986388.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T., Le, D.-A., Dang, T.-V., & Nguyen, T.-A. (2012). The UITK: Towards the designing a ubiquitous soft keyboard for disabled people. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-Based Applications & Services (pp. 399–402). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2428736.2428809
   Google Scholar
• Pires, G., Nunes, U., & Castelo-Branco, M. (2012). Comparison of a row-column speller vs. a novel lateral single-character speller: Assessment of BCI for severe motor disabled patients. Clinical Neurophysiology, 123(6), 1168–1181. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2011.10.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouplin, S., Robertson, J., Antoine, J.-Y., Blanchet, A., Kahloun, J. L., Volle, P., … Bensmail, D. (2014). Effect of dynamic keyboard and word-prediction systems on text input speed in persons with functional tetraplegia. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 51(3), 467–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouplin, S., Roche, N., Vaugier, I., Cabanilles, S., Hugeron, C., & Bensmail, D. (2015). Text input speed in persons with cervical spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord<AQ>Please provide volume number and page number(s) for [Pouplin et al., 2015]</AQ>. doi:10.1038/sc.2015.147
   Google Scholar
• Pouplin, S., Roche, N., Vaugier, I., Jacob, A., Figere, M., Pottier, S., … Bensmail, D. (2016). Influence of the number of predicted words on text input speed in participants with cervical spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roark, B., Fried-Oken, M., & Gibbons, C. (2015). Huffman and linear scanning methods with statistical language models. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(1), 37–50. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.997890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, A., Karat, C.-M., Oseitutu, K., Karimullah, A., & Feng, J. (2001). Productivity, satisfaction, and interaction strategies of individuals with spinal cord injuries and traditional users interacting with speech recognition software. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1(1), 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, R., Koester, H., & LoPresti, E. (2007). Selecting an appropriate scan rate: The “.65 rule.” Assistive Technology, 19(2), 51–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. M., & Simpson, R. C. (2009). Analyzing performance with computer access technology using unconstrained text entry protocol. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 46(7), 1059–1068. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2009.09.0134
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, R. O., Christiaansen, R., Borden, B., Lindberg, D., Gunderson, J., & Vanderheiden, G. (1989). Effectiveness of a writing system using a computerized long-range optical pointer and 10-branch abbreviation expansion. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 26(1), 51–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tam, C., Reid, D., Naumann, S., & O’Keefe, B. (2002). Effects of word prediction and location of word prediction list on text entry with children with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. AAC: Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 18(3), 147–162.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, C., & Wells, D. (2009). Evaluating the benefits of displaying word prediction lists on a personal digital assistant at the keyboard level. Assistive Technology, 21(3), 105–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumlin, J., & Heller, K. W. (2004). Using word prediction software to increase typing fluency with students with physical disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(3), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Wobbrock, J. O., & Myers, B. A. (2006). From letters to words: Efficient stroke-based word completion for trackball text entry. In Proceedings of the 8th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 2–9). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1168987.1168990
   Google Scholar
• Wobbrock, J. O., & Myers, B. A. (2008). Enabling devices, empowering people: The design and evaluation of Trackball EdgeWrite. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 3(1–2), 35–56. doi:10.1080/17483100701409227
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wobbrock, J. O., Myers, B. A., Aung, H. H., & LoPresti, E. F. (2004). Text entry from power wheelchairs: Edgewrite for joysticks and touchpads. In Proceedings of the 6th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 110–117). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1028630.1028650
   Google Scholar