What are the preferred characteristics of a service robot for the elderly? A multi-country focus group study with older adults and caregivers

References

• Acceptable robotiCs COMPanions for AgeiNg Years (ACCOMPANY). About Accompany Project. (2015) Retrieved from http://accompanyproject.eu
   Google Scholar
• Amirabdollahian, F., Op Den Akker, R., Bedaf, S., Bormann, R., Draper, H., Evers, V. K., … Hu, N. (2013). Assistive technology design and development for acceptable robotics companions for ageing years. PALADYN: Journal of Behavioural Robotics, 4(2), 94–112. doi:10.2478/pjbr-2013-0007
   Google Scholar
• AUTOPnP. (2017). Plug and Play for Automation Systems. Retrieved from https://www.ipa.fraunhofer.de
   Google Scholar
• Bedaf, S., Draper, H., Gelderblom, G.-J., Sorell, T., & De Witte, L. (2016). Can a service robot which supports independent living of older people disobey a command? The views of older people, informal carers and professional caregivers on the acceptability of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 8(3), 409–420. doi:10.1007/s12369-016-0336-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedaf, S., Gelderblom, G. J., & De Witte, L. (2015). Overview and categorization of robots supporting independent living of elderly people: What activities do they support and how far have they developed. Assistive Technology: The Official Journal of RESNA, 27(2), 88–100. doi:10.1080/10400435.2014.978916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedaf, S., Gelderblom, G. J., Syrdal, D. S., Lehmann, H., Michel, H., Hewson, D., … De Witte, L. (2013). Which activities threaten independent living of elderly when becoming problematic: Inspiration for meaningful service robot functionality. Disability & Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 9(6), 445–452. doi:10.3109/17483107.2013.840861
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beer, J. M., Smarr, C. A., Chen, T. L., Prakash, A., Mitzner, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2012). The domesticated robot: Design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (pp. 335–342). Boston, MA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bekey, G., Ambrose, R., Kumar, V., Sanderson, A., Wilcox, B., & Zheng, Y. (2006). International assessment of research and development in robotics (Final report). Retrieved from http://www.wtec.org
   Google Scholar
• BRICS. (2017). Best practices in robotics. Retrieved from https://www.care-o-bot.de
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., & MacDonald, B. (2009). Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: Review and future directions. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1, 319–330. doi:10.1007/s12369-009-0030-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butter, M., Rensma, A., Van Boxsel, J., Kalisingh, S., Schoone, M., Leis, M., … Korhoven, I. (2008). Robotics for healthcare (Final report). Retrieved from https://www.tno.nl/
   Google Scholar
• Cogniron. (2007). COGNIRON: The cognitive robot companion. Retrieved from https://www.cogniron.org
   Google Scholar
• Dautenhahn, K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 679–704. doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.2004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S., Kaouri, C., Walters, M. L., Koay, K. L., & Werry, I. (2005). What is a robot companion-friend, assistant or butler? In 2005 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS; pp. 1192–1197). Edmonton, Canada: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• DESIRE. (2017). Deutsche servicerobotik initiative. Retrieved from https://www.care-o-bot.de
   Google Scholar
• Faucounau, V., Wu, Y. H., Boulay, M., Maestrutti, M., & Rigaud, A. S. (2009). Caregivers’ requirements for in-home robotic agent for supporting community-living elderly subjects with cognitive impairment. Technology and Health Care, 17(1), 33–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fraunhofer (2017). Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation. Retrieved from http://www.care-o-bot.de/
   Google Scholar
• Frennert, S., Östlund, B., & Eftring, H. (2012). Would granny let an assistive robot into her home? In International conference on social robotics (pp. 128–137). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., & Powers, A. (2003). Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (pp. 55–60). Millbrae, CA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1994). How might people interact with agents. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 68–71. doi:10.1145/176789.176796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigini, L. (2011). Tele-operated robots in elderly care at home: A survey on needs and perceptions of elderly people and caregivers. Assistive Technology Research Series, 29, 542–549. doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-814-4-542
   Google Scholar
• R3-COP. (2013). Resilient Reasoning Robotic Co-operating Systems. Retrieved from https://www.r3-cop.eu
   Google Scholar
• Smarr, C. A., Prakash, A., Beer, J. M., Mitzner, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A. (2012). Older adults’ preferences for and acceptance of robot assistance for everyday living tasks. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 153–157). Sage, CA: SAGE Publications. doi:10.1177/1071181312561009
   Google Scholar
• SRS. (2016). Multi-Role Shadow Robotic System for Independent Living. Retrieved from http://srs-project.eu/
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Lelie, C. (2005). The value of storyboards in the product design process. In Proceedings of 3AD third international conference on appliance design (pp. 87–89). Bristol, UK: The Appliance Design Network.
   Google Scholar
• WiMi-Care. (2014). Wissenstransfers für eine aktive Mitgestaltung des Pflegesektors durch Mikrosystemtechnik. Retrieved from https://www.uni-due.de/wimi-care/
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y.-H., Fassert, C., & Rigaud, A.-S. (2012). Designing robots for the elderly: Appearance issue and beyond. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 54(1), 121–126. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2011.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar