Publication Cover
Assistive Technology
The Official Journal of RESNA
Volume 34, 2022 - Issue 5
8,466
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Humanoid robots in the care of older persons: A scoping review

, , PhD, , , PhD, , , PhD & , , PhD
Pages 518-526 | Accepted 13 Jan 2021, Published online: 05 Mar 2021

References

  • Abdollahi, H., Mollahosseini, A., Lane, J. T., & Mahoor, M. H. (2017). A pilot study on using an intelligent life-like robot as a companion for elderly individuals with dementia and depression. In 2017 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. Birmingham, UK. https://doi.org/10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2017.8246925
  • Arksey, H., & O´Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  • Azeta, J., Bolu, C., Abioye, A. A., & Festus, O. (2018). A review on humanoid robotics in healthcare. MATEC Web of Conferences, 153(5), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815302004
  • Balasubramanian, S., Klein, J., & Burdet, E. (2010). Robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function. Current Opinion in Neurology, 23(6), 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0b013e32833e99a4
  • Bedaf, S., Marti, P., Amirabdollahian, F., & de Witte, L. (2018). A multi-perspective evaluation of a service robot for seniors: The voice of different stakeholders. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(6), 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2017.1358300
  • Belter, J. T., Segil, J. L., Dollar, A. M., & Weir, R. F. (2013). Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 50(5), 599–618. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0188
  • Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., & MacDonald, B. (2009). Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: A review and future directions. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(4), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0030-6
  • Broekens, J., Heerink, M., & Rosendal, H. (2009). Assistive social robots in elderly care: A review. Gerontechnology, 8(2), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00
  • Cheng, G. (2015). Humanoid robotics and neuroscience: Science, engineering, and society. In G. Cheng (Ed.), Frontiers in neuroengineering (pp. 3–28). CRC Press/Taylor and Francis.
  • Cleary, K., & Nguyen, C. (2001). State of the art in surgical robotics: Clinical applications and technology challenges. Computer Assisted Surgery, 6(6), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/igs.10019
  • Doering, N., Richter, K., Gross, H.-M., Schroeter, C., Mueller, S., Volkhardt, M., Scheidig, A., & Debes, K. (2015). Robotic companions for older people: A case study in the wild. Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine, 13(219), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-595-1-147
  • Effective Practice and Organisation of Care [EPOC]. (2017). Suggested risk of bias criteria for EPOC reviews. epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc
  • Eurostat (2019). Ageing Europe. Looking at the lives of older people in the EU. Luxembourg: European Union.
  • Evans, D., Price, K., & Meyer, J. (2016). Home alone with dementia. Sage Open, 6(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016664954
  • Feingold-Polak, R., Elishay, A., Shahar, Y., Stein, M., Edan, Y., & Levy-Tzedek, S. (2018). Differences between young and old users when interacting with a humanoid robot: A qualitative usability study. Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 9(1), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2018.05.1163
  • González-Colaço Harmand, M., Meillon, C., Rullier, L., Avila-Funes, J.-A., Bergua, V., Dartigues, J.-F., & Amieva, H. (2014). Cognitive decline after entering a nursing home: A 22-year follow-up study of institutionalized and noninstitutionalized elderly people. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 15(7), 504–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2014.02.006
  • Iftikhar, M., Majid, M. B., Muralindran, M., Thayabaren, G., Vigneswaran, R., & Brendan, T. T. K. (2011). Otorob: Robot for orthopaedic surgeon roboscope: Non-interventional medical robot for telerounding. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (pp. 1–5), Wuhan, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/icbbe.2011.5780335
  • Ikeya, K., Aoki, J. I., Ikeda, N., Nimomiya, T., Tashiro, T., Okamura, T., & Suzuki, J. I. (2018). Use of a human-type communication robot to evaluate the categorized communicative ability of older adults with dementia. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 18(1), 188–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13185.
  • Ishiguro, K., Majima, Y., & Sakata, N. (2016). Deployment of ARCS model and utilization of communication robot in patient education. Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, 5, 371–376. https://doi.org/10.5220/0005774603710376
  • Joanna Briggs Institute. (2015). The Joanna Briggs institute reviewers´ manual 2015: Methodology for JBI scoping reviews. http://joannabriggs.org/assets/docs/sumari/Reviewers-Manual_Methodology-for-JBI-Scoping-Reviews_2015_v2.pdf
  • Kouroupetroglou, C., Casey, D., Raciti, M., Barrett, E., D’Onofrio, G., Ricciardi, F., Giuliani, F., Greco, A., Sancarlo, D., Mannion, A., Whelan, S., Pegman, G., Koumpis, A., Reforgiato Recupero, D., Kouroupetroglou, A., & Santorelli, A. (2017). Interacting with Dementia: The MARIO approach. Studies in Health Technology And Informatics, 242, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-798-6-38
  • Krebs, H., & Volpe, B. (2013). Rehabilitation robotics. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, 110(1), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52901-5.00023-X
  • Krippendorf, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Sage.
  • Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(69), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69.
  • Mariappan, M., Ganesan, T., Ramu, V., & Iftikhar, M. (2011). Safety system and navigation for orthopaedic robot (OTOROB). In S. Jeschke, H. Liu, & D. Schilberg, (Eds.), Intelligent robotics and applications. ICIRA 2011. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 358–367). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25489-5_35
  • Melkas, H., Hennala, L., Pekkarinen, S., & Kyrki, V. (2016). Human impact assessment of robot implementation in finnish elderly care. In International Conference on Serviceology, 202–206. Lappeenranta.
  • Mohamed, Z., & Capi, G. (2012). Development of a new mobile humanoid robot for assisting elderly people. Procedia Engineering, 41, 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.183
  • Morovitz, M., Mueller, M., & Scheutz, M. (2017). Animal–robot interaction: The role of human likeness on the success of dog–robot interactions. 1st International Workshop on Vocal Interactivity in-and-between Humans, Animals and Robots (VIHAR) (pp. 22–26).
  • Niheh, M., Sakuma, N., Yabe, H., Kamata, M., & Inoue, T. (2017). Design of a behavior of robot that attracts the interest of the mildly demented elderly. Studies in Health technology and Informatics, 242, 492–500. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-798-6-492
  • Orejana, J., MacDonald, B. A., Ahn, H. S., Peri, K., & Broadbent, E. (2015). Healthcare robots in homes of rural older adults. In A. E. Tapus A. (Ed.), Social robotics. ICSR 2015. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 512–521). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25554-5_51
  • Piezzo, C., & Suzuki, K. (2017). Feasibility study of a socially assistive humanoid robot for guiding elderly individuals during walking. Future Internet, 9(3), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi9030030
  • Pripfl, J., Körtner, T., Bathko-Klein, D., Hebesberger, D., Weniner, M., Gisinger, C., Frennert, S., Eftring, H., Antona, M., & Adami, I. (2016). Result of a real world trial with a mobile social service robot for older adults. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, 497–498. Christchurch, New Zealand. 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2016.7451824
  • Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing an Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
  • Sharkey, N. E. (2012). The viability of autonomous robot warfare. International Review of the Red Cross, 94(886), 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383112000732
  • Singh, A., & Misra, N. (2009). Loneliness, depression and sociability in old age. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 18(1), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.57861
  • Smer rapport. (2014). Robotar och övervakning i vården av äldre- etiska aspekter. Rapport av Statens medicinsk-etiska råd.
  • Torta, E., Werner, F. O., Johnson, D., Juola, J. F., Cuijpers, R. H., Bazzani, M., Oberzaucher, J., Lemberger, J., Lewy, H., & Bregman, J. (2014). Evaluation of a small socially-assistive humanoid robot in intelligent homes for the care of the elderly. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 76(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-013-0019-0
  • Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O´Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Straus, S. E., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., Lewin, S., & Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. . Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850
  • WHO. (1999). Ageing – Exploding the myths. Ageing and Health Programme (AHE). Retrieved from Ageing – exploding the myths. https://www.who.int/healthinfo/survey/ageingdefnolder/en/
  • Wu, Y.-H., Wrobel, J., Cornuet, M., Kerherve, H., Damnée, S., & Riguad, A.-S. (2014). Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: A mixed-method study of human-robot interaction over a 1-month period in the living lab setting. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 8(9), 801–811. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S56435