Accessibility to digital technology: Virtual barriers, real opportunities

References

• Accessibility requirements suitable for public procurement of ict products and services in europe. (n.d.).
   Google Scholar
• Astbrink, G., & Tibben, W. (2013). The role of public procurement in improving accessibility to ict. Telecommunications Journal of Australia, 63(2). https://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/items/5cc03e36-fe35-42b2-ad85-d572f611f6cb/1/https://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/file/5cc03e36-fe35-42b2-ad85-d572f611f6cb/1/tja_2013_vol63_no2_21-astbrink_tibben.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bamberger, K. A., & Lobel, O. (2017). Platform market power. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 32, 1051. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38N00ZT38
   Google Scholar
• Blanck, P. D., & Sandler, L. A. (2000). ADA title iii and the internet: Technology and civil rights. Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter, 24(5), 855–859. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20785496
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borg, J., Lantz, A., & Gulliksen, J. (2014). Accessibility to electronic communication for people with cognitive disabilities: A systematic search and review of empirical evidence. Univ Access Inf Soc 14, 547–562 (2015). Springer. Retrieved May 8, 2021 from .
   Google Scholar
• Breyer, S. (1970). The uneasy case for copyright: A study of copyright in books, photocopies, and computer programs. Harvard Law Review, 84(2), 281–351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1339714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, A. (2004). A history of accessibility at ibm. In AccessWorld. American Foundation for the Blind. Retrieved October 12, 2020 from https://www.afb.org/aw/5/2/14760 .
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M., Sloan, D., Kelly, B., & Lewthwaite, S. (2012). A challenge to web accessibility metrics and guidelines: Putting people and processes first. In W4A 2012: 9th InternationalCross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, 2012-04-16- 2012-04-18, Lyon, France. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.368.4163&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• DAISY. (2020). It’s time to use the modern digital publishing format for your organization’s documents. Retrieved October 1, 2020, from https://daisy.org/info-help/time-to-use-the-modern-digital-publishing-format/.
   Google Scholar
• Doctorow, C. (2020). IP. Locus Online. Locus Publications. Retrieved September 20, 2020 from https://locusmag.com/2020/09/cory-doctorow-ip/ .
   Google Scholar
• FDA. (2020). Hearing aids and cell phones. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved September 28, 2020 from https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/cell-phones/hearing-aids-and-cell-phones .
   Google Scholar
• Fukuda, K., Saito, S., Takagi, H., & Asakawa, C. (2005). Proposing new metrics to evaluate webusability for the blind. In Extended abstracts of proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on humanfactors in computing systems, CHI’05 (pp. 1387–1390). ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• G3ICT. (2015). PhoneGap/cordova: A key to apps portability for all users. Retrieved September 23, 2020 from https://g3ict.org/publication.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, J. A. (2010). A new method for wireless connectivity in hearing aids. The Hearing Journal, 63(10), 36–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000389925.64797.e5
   Google Scholar
• Goodrich, G. L. (1984). Applications of microcomputers by visually impaired persons. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 78(9), 408–414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X8407800904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, M., Leblois, A., Bianchi, F. C., & Montenegro, V. (2014). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities 2012 ict accessibility progress report. Survey Conducted in Collaboration with DPI—Disabled Peoples’ International. G3ict.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, M., Leblois, A., Cesa Bianchi, F., & Montenegro, V. (2015). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, assistive technology and information and communication technology requirements: Where do we stand on implementation? Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 10(4), 295–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haucap, J., & Heimeshoff, U. (2014). Google, facebook, amazon, eBay: Is the internet driving competition or market monopolization? International Economics and Economic Policy, 11(1–2), 49–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-013-0247-6
   Google Scholar
• HLisaStevens. (2008). History of assistive technology. Timetoast. Retrieved November 1, 2020 from https://www.timetoast.com/timelines/history-of-assistive-technology/.
   Google Scholar
• Isaak, J. (2000). Toward equal web access for all. IT Professional, 2(6), 49–51. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/6294/19198/x0341588.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ISO. (2019). ISO/iec 40500:2012 [web content accessibility guidelines (wcag) 2.0. International Organization for Standardization. Retrieved on October 15, 2020 from https://www.iso.org/standard/58625.html.
   Google Scholar
• Izzo, M. V., & Bauer, W. M. (2015). Universal design for learning: Enhancing achievement and employment of stem students with disabilities. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-013-0332-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, P. T. (2006). Telecommunications policy and individuals with disabilities: Issues of accessibility and social inclusion in the policy and research agenda. Telecommunications Policy, 30(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layton, N. (2012). Barriers and facilitators to community mobility for assistive technology users. Rehabilitation Research and Practice, 2012, 1–9. Article ID 454195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/454195
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. (2009). Code: And other laws of cyberspace. ReadHowYouWant. com.
   Google Scholar
• Level Access, G3ict, & IAAP. (2020). The state of digital accessibility report. Level Access, G3ict; IAAP. Retrieved October 1, 2020, from https://g3ict.org/publication.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, J. S. (2020). Promoting product longevity. How can the eu product safety and compliance framework help promote product durability and tackle planned obsolescence, foster the production of more sustainable products, and achieve more transparent supply chains for consumers? European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/648767/IPOL_STU(2020)648767_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. K. M., & Netz, J. S. (2002). Manipulating interface standards as an anti-competitive strategy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.7.4063&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, R. B., & Lee, D. R. (2008). In defense of monopoly: How market power fosters creative production. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, C. (2015). Meet the team that makes it possible for the blind to use facebook. Condé Nast. Retrieved October 2, 2020 from https://www.wired.com/2015/02/meet-team-makes-possible-blind-use-facebook/.
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft. (2010) . Engineering software for accessibility.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. (2018). You gotta fight for your right to repair: The digital millennium copyright act’s effect on right-to-repair legislation. Texas A&M Law Review, 6(2), 509. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37419/LR.V6.I2.6
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, J. (2008). Accessibility for everybody: Understanding the section 508 accessibility requirements. Apress.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. M. (2011). Anticompetitive product design in the new economy. Florida State University Law Review, 39(39), 681. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/flsulr39&div=30&id=&page=
   Google Scholar
• Newman, L., Browne-Yung, K., Raghavendra, P., Wood, D., & Grace, E. (2017). Applying a critical approach to investigate barriers to digital inclusion and online social networking among young people with disabilities. Information Systems Journal, 27(5), 559–588. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual, A., Ribera, M., & Granollers, T. (2015). Impact of web accessibility barriers on users with a hearing impairment. Dyna, 82(193), 233–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v82n193.53499
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, S. (2007). A brief history of facebook. The Guardian. Retrieved October 2, 2020 from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2007/jul/25/media.newmedia.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. M., & Sprigle, S. (1997). Physical accessibility guidelines of consumer product controls. Assistive Technology, 9(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1997.10132291
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riley,C. A . (2020). Unpacking interoperability in competition. Journal of Cyber Policy,5(1), 94–106. Retrieved May 8, 2021 fromhttps://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2020.1740754
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, C.-M. (2020). Flatten inaccessibility: Impact of covid-19 on adults who are blind or have low vision in the united states. American Foundation for the Blind. Retrieved September 30, 2020 from https://www.afb.org/press-room/press-release-archive/announces-flatten-inaccessibility-report.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, A. L. (2014). Open standards and the digital age. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Gordón, M.-L., & Moreno, L. (2014). Toward an integration of web accessibility into testing processes. Procedia Computer Science, 27(27), 281–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.02.031
   Google Scholar
• Sawetrattanasatian, O., others. (2019). Access to information of disabled people on the web: A dispute between accessibility and digital rights management. Global Academy of Training; Research (GATR) Enterprise.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, M. J., Sax, C., Vanbiervliet, A., Cushman, L. A., & Scherer, J. V. (2005). Predictors of assistive technology use: The importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(21), 1321–1331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500164800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Section 508 of the rehabilitation act. (n.d.). United States Congress. Retrieved September 28, 2020 from https://www.fcc.gov/general/section-508-rehabilitation-act .
   Google Scholar
• Sevilla, J., Herrera, G., Martinez, B., & Alcantud, F. (2007). Web accessibility for individuals with cognitive deficits: A comparative study between an existing commercial web and its cognitively accessible equivalent. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 14(3), 12–es. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1279700.1279702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, D. (2019). The antitrust case against facebook: A monopolist’s journey towards pervasive surveillance in spite of consumers’ preference for privacy. Berkeley Business Law Journal, 16(39), 39. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/berkbusj16&div=5&id=&page=
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, S., Richter, J. L., Maitre-Ekern, E., Pihlajarinne, T., Maigret, A., & Dalhammar, C. (2018). The emerging ‘right to repair’legislation in the eu and the us. Proceedings from Going Green–Care Innovation, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Times, N. Y. (1991). Bridging a gap for blind pc users ( pp. Section 1, Page33, Nationaledition). New York Times. Retrieved October 3, 2020 from https://www.nytimes.com/1991/02/16/business/bridging-a-gap-for-blind-pc-users.html.
   Google Scholar
• UN. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. General Assembly of the United Nations. Retrieved October 12, 2020 from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html#Fulltext.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP. (2007). E-government interoperability: Guide. United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved October 2, 2020 from http://www.unapcict.org/sites/default/files/2019-01/e-GovernmentInteroperability-Guide.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• W3C. (n.d.). Web accessibility laws & policies. Retrieved October 15, 2020 from https://www.w3.org/WAI/policies/.
   Google Scholar
• Werbach, K. (2005). Breaking the ice: Rethinking telecommunications law for the digital age. Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 4(2005–2006), 59. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jtelhtel4&div=10&id=&page=
   Google Scholar
• West, J. (2004). What are open standards? Implications for adoption, competition and policy. Standards and Public Policy Conference; Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Chicago, Illinois. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.98.786&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• White, G. R., Fitzpatrick, G., & McAllister, G. (2008). Toward accessible 3D virtual environments for the blind and visually impaired. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts, 134–141. ACM Digital Library, Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Whitney, G., Keith, S., Bühler, C., Hewer, S., Lhotska, L., Miesenberger, K., Sandnes, F. E., Stephanidis, C., & Velasco, C. A. (2011). Twenty five years of training and education in ict design for all and assistive technology. Technology and Disability, 23(3), 163–170. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-2011-0324
   Google Scholar
• Whitt, R. S. (2012). A deference to protocol: Fashioning a three-dimensional public policy framework for the internet age. Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal, 31(2012–2013), 689. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/caelj31&div=33&id=&page=
   Google Scholar
• Yanz, J. L. (2005). Phones and hearing aids: Issues, resolutions, and a new approach. The Hearing Journal, 58(10), 41–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000285784.75866.1a
   Google Scholar