Psychometric properties of the psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS): A systematic review

References

• Andrich, R., Pedroni, F., & Vanni, G. (2003). Psychosocial impact of assistive devices: Italian localization of the PIADS instrument. In G. M. Craddock, L. P. McCormack, R. B. Reilly, & H. T. P. Knops (Eds.), Assistive technology-shaping the future (pp. 917–921).
   Google Scholar
• Bertrand, K., Raymond, M.-H., Miller, W. C., Ginis, K. A. M., & Demers, L. (2017). Walking aids for enabling activity and participation: A systematic review. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 96(12), 894–903. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables (Vol. 210). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bradet-Levesque, I., Audet, J., Roy, J.-S., & Flamand, V. H. (2021). Measuring functional outcome in Dupuytren’s disease: A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures. Journal of Hand Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2021.04.010
   Google Scholar
• Chae, S.-Y., & Jo, S.-J. (2014). Development and validation of Korean version of psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale. Assistive Technology, 26(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2013.796502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2013). Cook and Hussey’s assistive technologies-E-book: Principles and practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Day, H, Jutai, J. (1996). Measuring the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: The PIADS. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation, 9(2), 159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Day, J. J., Woolrich, W., & Graham Strong, H. (2001). The stability of impact of assistive devices. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23(9), 400–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280010008906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers, L., Monette, M., Descent, M., Jutai, J., & Wolfson, C. (2002). The psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS): Translation and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a Canadian–French version. Quality of Life Research, 11(6), 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016397412708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devitt, R., Chau, B., & Jutai, J. W. (2004). The effect of wheelchair use on the quality of life of persons with multiple sclerosis. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 17(3–4), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/J003v17n03_05
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harada, N., Fong, S., Heiney, C., Yentes, J. M., Perell-Gerson, K. L., & Fang, M. A. (2014). Evaluation of two cane instruments in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 51(2), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2013.06.0140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, Y.-J., & Lenker, J. A. (2006). The psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS): Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese (Taiwanese) version. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 1(1–2), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500167217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jutai, J., Day, H., Woolrich, W., & Strong, G. (2003). The predictability of retention and discontinuation of contact lenses. Optometry: Journal of the American Optometric Association.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jutai, J., & Day, H. (2002). Psychosocial impact of assistive devices scale (PIADS). Technology and Disability, 14(3), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-2002-14305
   Google Scholar
• Khan, F., Amatya, B., Avirmed, B., Kyoung Yi, Y., Shirmen, B., Tsegmid, N., Abbott, G., & Galea, M. P. (2018). World health organization global disability action plan: The Mongolian perspective. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 50(4), 358–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klamroth-Marganska, V. (2018). Stroke rehabilitation: Therapy robots and assistive devices. Sex-Specific Analysis of Cardiovascular Function, 579–587.
   Google Scholar
• MacDermid, J. C., Walton, D. M., & Law, M. (2009). Critical appraisal of research evidence for its validity and usefulness. Hand Clinics, 25(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2008.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDermid, J. (2008). Critical appraisal of study design for psychometric articles evaluation form and interpretation guide. Evidence based rehabilitation: A guide to practice (3rd ed.). Slack.
   Google Scholar
• Madara Marasinghe, K. (2016). Assistive technologies in reducing caregiver burden among informal caregivers of older adults: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 11(5), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2015.1087061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, A. C., Pinheiro, J., Farias, B., & Jutai, J. (2016). Psychosocial impact of assistive technologies for mobility and their implications for active ageing. Technologies, 4(3), 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies4030028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink, L. B., Boers, M., van der Vleuten, C., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., De Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2020). COSMIN risk of bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: A Delphi study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01179-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink, L. B., De Vet, H. C., Prinsen, C. A., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1171–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orellano, E. M., & Jutai, J. W. (2013). Cross-cultural adaptation of the psychosocial impact of assistive device scale (PIADS) for Puerto Rican assistive technology users. Assistive Technology, 25(4), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2012.761292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson, I., Ahlström, G., & Törnquist, K. (2007). The value of an outdoor powered wheelchair with regard to the quality of life of persons with stroke: A follow-up study. Assistive Technology, 19(3), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2007.10131871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinsen, C. A., Vohra, S., Rose, M. R., Boers, M., Tugwell, P., Clarke, M., Williamson, P. R., & Terwee, C. B. (2016). How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “core outcome set”–a practical guideline. Trials, 17(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rea, P. M. (2019). Biomedical visualisation. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, J. S., MacDermid, J. C., & Woodhouse, L. J. (2009). Measuring shoulder function: A systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis Care & Research: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology, 61(5), 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, J.-S., MacDermid, J. C., & Woodhouse, L. J. (2010). A systematic review of the psychometric properties of the Constant-Murley score. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 19(1), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner, D., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (2016). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Aust NZJ Public Health.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofani, M., Candeloro, C., Sabbadini, M., Lucibello, L., Figura, M., Fabbrini, G., Galeoto, G., & Castelli, E. (2018). The psychosocial impact of assistive device scale: Italian validation in a cohort of nonambulant people with neuromotor disorders. Assistive Technology.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund Axelsson, S., Nyberg, L., Näslund, A., & Melander Wikman, A. (2013). The anticipated positive psychosocial impact of present web-based E-health services and future Mobile health applications: An investigation among older swedes. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Yachnin, D., Finestone, H., Chin, A., & Jutai, J. (2018). Can technology-assisted toilets improve hygiene and Independence in geriatric rehabilitation? A cohort study. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 13(7), 626–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2017.1358303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yachnin, D., Gharib, G., Jutai, J., & Finestone, H. (2017). Technology-assisted toilets: Improving Independence and hygiene in stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering, 4, 2055668317725686. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055668317725686
   Google Scholar
• Zahid, A., & Boyle, B. (2013). Using impact measurement to establish confidence in emergent assistive technology services-first phase translation of the PIADS outcome measurement tool for implementation in an Arabic context. In Assistive technology: From research to practice (pp. 1071–1077). IOS Press.
   Google Scholar