Amputee, clinician, and regulator perspectives on current and prospective upper extremity prosthetic technologies

References

• Aasheim, T., & Finsen, V. (2014). The DASH and the quickDASH instruments. normative values in the general population in Norway. J Hand Surg Eur, 39(2), 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193413481302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboseria, M., Clemente, F., Engels, L. F., & Cipriani, C. (2018). Discrete vibro-tactile feedback prevents object slippage in hand prostheses more intuitively than other modalities. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 26(8), 1577–1584. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2851617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antfolk, C., D’Alonzo, M., Rosén, B., Lundborg, G., Sebelius, F., & Cipriani, C. (2013). Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 10(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1586/erd.12.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belter, J. T., Segil, J. L., Dollar, A. M., & Weir, R. M. (2013). Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: A review. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 50(5), 599–618. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.10.0188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddiss, E., Beaton, D., & Chau, T. (2007). Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 2(6), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483100701714733
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biddiss, E., & Chau, T. (2007a). Upper-limb prosthetics: Critical factors in device abandonment. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 86(12), 977–987. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181587f6c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddiss, E., & Chau, T. (2007b). Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 31(3), 236–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/03093640600994581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, H., & Marincek, C. (1994). Upper limb prosthetic use in Slovenia. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 18(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.3109/03093649409164667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrough, S. F., & Brook, J. A. (1985). Patterns of acceptance and rejection of upper limb prostheses. Orthotics and Prosthetics, 39(2), 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran, S., Nanivadekar, A. C., McKernan, G. P., Helm, E. R., Boninger, M. L., Collinger, J. L., … Fisher, L. E. (2020). Sensory restoration by epidural stimulation of the lateral spinal cord in upper-limb amputees. eLife, 9, e54349. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinger, J. L., Boninger, M. L., Bruns, T. M., Curley, K., Wang, W., & Weber, D. J. (2013). Functional priorities, assistive technology, and brain-computer interfaces after spinal cord injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 50(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2011.11.0213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordella, F., Ciancio, A. L., Sacchetti, R., Davalli, A., Cutti, A. G., Guglielmelli, E., & Zollo, L. (2016). Literature review on needs of upper limb prosthesis users. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10, 209. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuberovic, I., Gill, A., Resnik, L. J., Tyler, D. J., & Graczyk, E. L. (2019). Learning of artificial sensation through long-term home use of a sensory-enabled prosthesis. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 13, 853. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. (2004). A comparison of upper limb amputees and patients with upper limb injuries using the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH). Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(14–15), 917–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280410001708940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, T. S., Wark, H. A. C., Hutchinson, D. T., Warren, D. J., O’Neill, K., Scheinblum, T., … Greger, B. (2016). Restoring motor control and sensory feedback in people with upper extremity amputations using arrays of 96 microelectrodes implanted in the median and ulnar nerves. Journal of Neural Engineering, 13(3), 036001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/036001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond, D. M., & MacLachlan, M. (2005). Factor structure of the trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales (TAPES) with individuals with acquired upper limb amputations. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84(7), 506–513. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000166885.16180.63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudkiewicz, I., Gabrielov, R., Seiv-Ner, I., Zelig, G., & Heim, M. (2004). Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(1), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280410001645094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl, S. M., Chestek, C. A., Kelly, B., Davis, A., & Gates, D. H. (2017). Factors associated with interest in novel interfaces for upper limb prosthesis control. PLoS One, 12(8), e0182482. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl, S. M., Christie, B. P., Kelly, B., Davis, A., & Chestek, C. A. (2015). Surveying the interest of individuals with upper limb loss in novel prosthetic control techniques. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 12(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0044-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl, S. M., Meehan, S. K., & Gates, D. H. (2020). Differential experiences of embodiment between body-powered and myoelectric prosthesis users. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 15471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72470-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, P., Franchignoni, F., Giordano, A., & MacLachlan, M. (2010). Trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales: A psychometric assessment using classical test theory and rasch analysis. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 89(6), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181dd8cf1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graczyk, E. L., Gill, A., Tyler, D. J., & Resnik, L. J. (2019). The benefits of sensation on the experience of a hand: A qualitative case series. PLoS One, 14(1), e0211469. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graczyk, E. L., Resnik, L., Schiefer, M. A., Schmitt, M. S., & Tyler, D. J (2018). Home use of a neural-connected sensory prosthesis provides the functional and psychosocial experience of having a hand again. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 9866. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26952-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heinemann, A. W., Bode, R. K., & O’Reilly, C. (2003). Development and measurement properties of the orthotics and prosthetics users’ survey (OPUS): A comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 27(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/03093640308726682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, E.-K., Pearlman, J., Salatin, B., Wang, H., Liu, H.-Y., Cooper, R. A., & Hargroder, T. (2011). Design and development of a lightweight, durable, adjustable composite backrest mounting. Assistive Technology, 23(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2010.541405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, J. E., Wren, P. A., & Gruis, K. L. (2011). What would brain-computer interface users want? opinions and priorities of potential users with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, 12(5), 318–324. https://doi.org/10.3109/17482968.2011.572978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, E. M., Benz, H. L., Tsai, J.-H., & Bridges, J. F. (2018). Identifying and prioritizing concerns associated with prosthetic devices for use in a benefit-risk assessment: A mixed-methods approach. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 15(5), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2018.1470505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannes, M. S., Bigelow, J. D., Burck, J. M., Harshbarger, S. D., Kozlowski, M. V., & Van Doren, T. (2011). An overview of the developmental process for the modular prosthetic limb. The Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 30(3), 207–216. https://www.jhuapl.edu/Content/techdigest/pdf/V30-N03/30-3-Johannes.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, P., Currie, L. M., Drynan, D., Stainton, T., & Jongbloed, L. (2014). Getting it “right”: How collaborative relationships between people with disabilities and professionals can lead to the acquisition of needed assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 9(5), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2014.900574
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelley, M. A., Benz, H., Engdahl, S., & Bridges, J. F. P. (2019). Identifying the benefits and risks of emerging integration methods for upper limb prosthetic devices in the United States: An environmental scan. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 16(7), 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2019.1626231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerver, N., van Twillert, S., Maas, B., & van der Sluis, C. K. (2020). User-relevant factors determining prosthesis choice in persons with major unilateral upper limb defects: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature and focus group results. PLoS One, 15(6), e0234342. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgore, K. L., Scherer, M., Bobblitt, R., Dettloff, J., & Dombrowski, D. M. (2001). Neuroprosthesis consumers’ forum: Consumer priorities for research directions. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 38(6), 655–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Grindle, G., Chuang, F.-C., Kelleher, A., Cooper, R., Siewiorek, D.,… Cooper, R. (2012). A survey of feedback modalities for wheelchair power seat functions. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 11(3), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2011.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maat, B., Smit, G., Plettenburg, D., & Breedveld, P. (2018). Passive prosthetic hands and tools: A literature review. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 42(1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364617691622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovic, M., Schweisfurth, M. A., Engels, L. F., Bentz, T., Wüstefeld, D., Farina, D., & Dosen, S. (2018). The clinical relevance of advanced artificial feedback in the control of a multi-functional myoelectric prosthesis. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 15(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0371-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McFarland, L. H. W., Heinemann A, S., Jones, M., & Esquenazi, A. (2010). Unilateral upper-limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts. Journal of Rehabilitation Reserach & Development, 47(4), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2009.03.0027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mhatre, A., Duvall, J., Ding, D., Cooper, R., & Pearlman, J. (2016). Design and focus group evaluation of a bed-integrated weight measurement system for wheelchair users. Assistive, 28(4), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2016.1140690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Health and Medicine; Division; Board on Health Care Services. (May 9 2017). Committee on the use of selected assistive products and technologies in eliminating or reducing the effects of impairments. In A. M. Jette, C. M. Spicer, & J. L. Flaubert (Eds.), The promise of assistive technology to enhance activity and work participation. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, X., Krueger, T. B., Lago, N., Micera, S., Stieglitz, T., & Dario, P. (2005). A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System, 10(3), 229–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1085-9489.2005.10303.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Catalan, M., Mastinu, E., Sassu, P., Aszmann, O., & Brånemark, R. (2020). Self-contained neuromusculoskeletal arm prostheses. The New England Journal of Medicine, 382(18), 1732–1738. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1917537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østlie, K., Lesjø, I. M., Franklin, R. J., Garfelt, B., Skjeldal O. H., & Magnus, P. (2012b). Prosthesis use in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees: Patterns of wear, prosthetic skills and the actual use of prostheses in activities of daily life. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 7(6), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2011.653296
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Østlie, K., Lesjø, I. M., Franklin, R. J., Garfelt B., Skjeldal, O. H., & Magnus, P. (2012a). Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: A population-based survey. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 7(4), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2011.635405
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page, D. M., George, J. A., Kluger, D. T., Duncan, C., Wendelken, S., Davis, T., … Clark, G. A. (2018). Motor control and sensory feedback enhance prosthesis embodiment and reduce phantom pain after long-term hand amputation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 352. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00352
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pena, A. E., Rincon-Gonzalez, L., Abbas, J. J., & Jung, R. (2019). Effects of vibrotactile feedback and grasp interface compliance on perception and control of a sensorized myoelectric hand. PLoS One, 14(1), e0210956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preatoni, G., Valle, G., Petrini, F. M., & Raspopovic, S. (2021). Lightening the perceived prosthesis weight with neural embodiment promoted by sensory feedback. Current Biology: CB, 31(5), 1065–1071.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.11.069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raichle, K. A., Hanley, M. A., Molton, I., Kadel, N. J., Campbell, K., Phelps, E., … Smith, D G. (2008). Prosthesis use in persons with lower- and upper-limb amputation. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 45(7), 961–972. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2007.09.0151
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Resnik, L. J., Acluche, F., Borgia, M., Latlief, G., & Phillips, S. (2019). EMG pattern recognition control of the DEKA arm: impact on user ratings of satisfaction and usability. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med, 7, 2100113. https://doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2018.2883943
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Resnik, L. J., Acluche, F., & Lieberman Klinger, S. (2018). User experience of controlling the DEKA arm with EMG pattern recognition. PLoS One, 13(9), e0203987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, L. J., Acluche, F., Lieberman Klinger, S., & Borgia, M. (2018). Does the DEKA arm substitute for or supplement conventional prostheses. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 42(5), 534–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364617729924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, L. J., Borgia, M., Heinemann, A. W., & Clark, M. A. (2020). Prosthesis satisfaction in a national sample of veterans with upper limb amputation. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 44(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364619895201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, L. J., Borgia, M. L., & Acluche, F. (2017). Perceptions of satisfaction, usability and desirability of the DEKA arm before and after a trial of home use. PLoS One, 12(6), e0178640. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, L. J., Borgia, M., Biester, S., & Clark, M. A. (2020). Longitudinal study of prosthesis use in veterans with upper limb amputation. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 45(1), 309364620957920. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364620957920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, L. J., Borgia, M., & Silver, B. (2017). Measuring community integration in persons with limb trauma and amputation: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 98(3), 561–580.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, L. J., & Borgia, M. (2014). User ratings of prosthetic usability and satisfaction in VA study to optimize DEKA arm. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 51(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2013.02.0056
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Resnik, L. J., Klinger, S. L., & Etter, K. (2014a). The DEKA arm: Its features, functionality, and evolution during the veterans affairs study to optimize the DEKA arm. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 38(6), 492–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364613506913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, L. J., Klinger, S. L., & Etter, K. (2014b). User and clinician perspectives on DEKA arm: Results of VA study to optimize DEKA arm. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 51(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2013.03.0068
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salminger, S., Stino, H., Pichler, L. H., Gstoettner, C., Sturma, A., Mayer, J. A., … Aszmann, O. C. (2020). Current rates of prosthetic usage in upper-limb amputees - have innovations had an impact on device acceptance? Disability and Rehabilitation, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1866684
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, P. M. H., IJzerman, M. J., Roach, M. J., & Gustafson, K. J. (2011). Patient preferences for next generation neural prostheses to restore bladder function. Spinal Cord, 49(1), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2010.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, J. S., & Di Fabio, R. P. (2004). Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57(10), 1008–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield, J. S., Shell, C. E., Beckler, D. T., Thumser, Z. C., & Marasco, P. D., (2020). Long-term home-use of sensory-motor integrated bidirectional bionic prosthetic arms promotes functional, perceptual, and cognitive changes. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14, 120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shehata, A. W., Rehani, M., Jassat, Z. E., & Hebert, J. S. (2020). Mechanotactile sensory feedback improves embodiment of a prosthetic hand during active use. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 14, 263. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solway, S., Beaton, D. E., McConnell, S., & Bombardier, C. (2002). The DASH outcome measure users’ manual. Institute for Work & Health.
   Google Scholar
• Spiers, A. J., Resnik, L., & Dollar, A. M. (2017). Analyzing at-home prosthesis use in unilateral upper-limb amputees to inform treatment & device design. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot (vol. 2017, pp. 1273–1280). London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Sugawara, A. T., Ramos VD, Alfieri F. M., & Battistella LR. (2018). Abandonment of assistive products: Assessing abandonment levels and factors that impact on it. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(7), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1425748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, P., Wijk, U., Björkman, A., & Antfolk, C. (2017). A review of invasive and non-invasive sensory feedback in upper limb prostheses. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 14(6), 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2017.1332989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, D. W., Schiefer, M. A., Keith, M. W., Anderson, J. R., Tyler, J., & Tyler, D. J. (2014). A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception. Science Translational Medicine, 6(257), 257ra138. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3008669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trent, L., Intintoli, M., Prigge, P., Bollinger, C., Walters, L. S., Conyers, D., … Ryan, T. (2020). A narrative review: Current upper limb prosthetic options and design. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 15(6), 604–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1594403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census. (2018). Resident populations of the United States by sex and age as of July 1, 2018. United States Census Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Valle, G., Mazzoni, A., Iberite, F., D’Anna, E., Strauss, I., Granata, G., …Micera, S. (2018). Biomimetic intraneural sensory feedback enhances sensation naturalness, tactile sensitivity, and manual dexterity in a bidirectional prosthesis. Neuron, 100(1), 37–45.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, M. J., Goddard, E, Stephens-Fripp, B., & Alici, G. (2020). Towards including end-users in the design of prosthetic hands: ethical analysis of a survey of Australians with upper-limb difference. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 981–1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00168-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijk, U. & Carlsson, I. (2015). Forearm amputees’ views of prosthesis use and sensory feedback. Journal of Hand Therapy, 28(3), 269–277. quiz 278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2015.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zecca, M., Micera, S., Carrozza, M. C., & Dario, P. (2002). Control of multifunctional prosthetic hands by processing the electromyographic signal. Disability and Health Journal, 30(4–6), 459–485. https://doi.org/10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v30.i456.80
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, J. Y., Kalpakjian, C., Larrága-Martínez, M., Chestek, C. A., & Gates, D. H. (2019). Priorities for the design and control of upper limb prostheses: A focus group study. Disability and Health Journal, 12(4), 706–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.03.009
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler-Graham, K., MacKenzie, E. J., Ephraim, P. L., Travison, T. G., & Brookmeyer, R. (2008). Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(3), 422–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar