2,328
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Groundwork

Collaborative Reflection Under the Microscope: Using Conversation Analysis to Study the Transition From Case Presentation to Discussion in GP Residents' Experience Sharing Sessions

&

References

  • Mann K, Gordon J, MacLeod A. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Advance Health Sciences Education 2009;14:595–621.
  • Sandars J. The use of reflection in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 44. Medical Teacher 2009;31:685–95.
  • Hak T, Maguire P. Group process: The black box of studies on problem-based learning. Academic Medicine 2000;75:769–72.
  • Waring Hansun Z. Mentor invitations for reflection in post-observation conferences: Some preliminary considerations. Applied Linguistics Review 2014;5:99–123.
  • Veen M, Snijders-Blok B, Bareman F, Bueving H. Uitwisselen van ervaringen in de huisartsopleiding [Experiential learning during general practice education and training]. Huisarts en Wetenschap 2015;58:6–10.
  • Runia E. Constructing a congruent curriculum for the training of GPs. In A Scherpbier, C Van der Vleuten, J Rethans, A Van der Steeg (Eds.), Advances in medical education (pp. 292–4). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 1997.
  • Runia E. The parallel process in the training of general practitioners. Medical Teacher 1995;17:399–408.
  • Runia E, Nijenhuis E. “Experience-sharing” as an antidote to dependence-making behavior of general practitioners. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy 1995;45:17–35.
  • Van Es JC. Een halve eeuw huisartsgeneeskunde. [Half a century of General Practice] Houten, the Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum, 2006.
  • Balint M. The doctor, his patient and the illness. New York, NY: International University Press, 1957.
  • Torppa MA, Makkonen E, Mårtenson C, Pitkälä KH. A qualitative analysis of student Balint groups in medical education: Contexts and triggers of case presentations and discussion themes. Patient Education and Counseling 2008;72:5–11.
  • Veen M, Sliedrecht K, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Bareman F. What do residents discuss during Exchange of Experiences? Huisarts en Wetenschap 2015.
  • Sidnell J. Basic conversation analytic methods. In J Sidnell, T Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 77–99). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
  • Sacks H, Schegloff E, Jefferson G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 1974;50:696–735.
  • Ten Have P. Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1999.
  • Heritage J. Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In R Sanders, K Fitch (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 103–46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2004.
  • Barnes R. Conversation analysis: A practical resource in the health care setting. Medical Education. 2005;39:113–5.
  • Rizan C, Elsey C, Lemon T, Grant A, Monrouxe LV. Feedback in action within bedside teaching encounters: A video ethnographic study. Medical Education 2014;48:902–20.
  • Maynard DW, Heritage J. Conversation analysis, doctor–patient interaction and medical communication. Medical Education 2005;39:428–35.
  • De la Croix A, Skelton J. The simulation game: An analysis of interactions between students and simulated patients. Medical Education 2013;47:49–58.
  • Giddens A. Sociology 5th edition. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2006.
  • Schegloff E. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • Sinclair J, Coulthard M. Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1975.
  • Mehan H. “What time is it Denise?”: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into Practice 1979;18:285–94.
  • Koshik I. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in Conversation analysis. Research on Language & Social Interaction 2002;35:277–309.
  • Margutti P. On designedly incomplete utterances: What counts as learning for teachers and students in primary classroom interaction. Research on Language & Social Interaction 2010;43:315–45.
  • Heritage J. The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 2012;45:30–52.
  • Heritage J, Raymond G. The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 2005;68:15–38.
  • Koole T. Conversation analysis and education. In C Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 977–82). Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2012.
  • Stokoe EH. Constructing topicality in university students' small-group discussion: A conversation analytic approach. Language and Education 2000;14:184–203.
  • Benwell B, Stokoe EH. Constructing discussion tasks in university tutorials: Shifting dynamics and identities. Discourse Studies 2002;4:429–53.
  • Benwell B. The organisation of knowledge in British university tutorial discourse: Pedagogic discourse strategies and disciplinary identity. Pragmatics 1999;9:535–65.
  • Koschmann T, Glenn P, Conlee M. Analyzing the emergence of a learning issue in a problem-based learning meeting. Medical Education Online 1997;2(2). Available at: http://www.msu.edu/∼dsolomon/res00003.pdf. Accessed June 25, 2015.
  • Zemel A, Koschmann T. ‘Put your fingers right in here’: Learnability and instructed experience. Discourse Studies 2014;16:163–83.
  • Koschmann T, LeBaron C. Learner articulation as interactional achievement: Studying the conversation of gesture. Cognition and instruction 2002;20:249–82.
  • Harris J, Jervis-Tracey P, Keogh J. Doing collaborative reflection in the professional experience. Australian Journal of Communication 2013;40:33–46.
  • Waring HZ. Two mentor practices that generate teacher reflection without explicit solicitations: Some preliminary considerations. RELC Journal 2013;44:103–19.
  • Fassnacht CWD. Transana v2.43. Madison, WI: The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, 2013.
  • Jefferson G. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 14–31). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins, 2004.
  • Weiste E, Peräkylä A. A comparative conversation analytic study of formulations in psychoanalysis and cognitive psychotherapy. Research on Language & Social Interaction 2013;46:299–321.
  • Bolden GB. “Articulating the unsaid” via and-prefaced formulations of others' talk. Discourse Studies 2010;12:5–32.
  • Labov W, Fanshel D. Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy and conversation. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1977.
  • Peräkylä A, Antaki C, Vehviläinen S, Leudar I (Eds.). Conversation analysis and psychotherapy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  • Arminen I. Sharing experiences: Doing therapy with the help of mutual references in the meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous. The Sociological Quarterly 1998;39:491–515.
  • Arminen I. Second stories: The salience of interpersonal communication for mutual help in Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Pragmatics 2004;36:319–47.
  • Arminen I. Closing of turns in the meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous: Members' methods for closing “sharing experiences.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 2001;34:211–51.
  • Bülow PH. Sharing experiences of contested illness by storytelling. Discourse & Society. 2004;15:33–53.
  • Schegloff EA. Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 1992;97:1295–345.
  • Heritage J. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction. 2012;45:1–29.
  • Karnieli-Miller O, Vu TR, Holtman MC, Clyman SG, Inui TS. Medical students' professionalism narratives: A window on the informal and hidden curriculum. Academic Medicine 2010;85:124–33.
  • Martin J. What should we do with a hidden curriculum when we find one? In H Giroux, D Purpel (Eds.), The hidden curriculum and moral education (pp. 122–39). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan, 1983.