Discovering the Benefits of Group Peer Review of Submitted Manuscripts

References

• Dumenco L, Engle DL, Goodell K, et al. Expanding group peer review: a proposal for medical education scholarship. Acad Med. 2017;92(2):147–149. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artino A, Simpson D, Skar D. Unpacking peer review together: using group peer review to improve scholarship and foster community. Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead Annual Meeting. 2017. Boston, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Ilgen JS, Artino AR, Simpson D, et al. Group peer review: the breakfast of champions. J. Grad Med Educ. 2016;8(5):646–649. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00531.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Odom S, Glenn B, Sanner S et al. Group peer review as an active learning strategy in a research course. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 2009;21(1):108–117.
   Google Scholar
• Yarris LM, Simpson D, Ilgen JS, et al. Team-based coaching approach to peer review: sharing service and scholarship. J Grad Med Educ. 2017;9(1):127–128. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00833.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong VSS, Strowd RE, Aragón-García R, et al. Mentored peer review of standardized manuscripts as a teaching tool for residents: a pilot randomized controlled multi-center study. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2017; 2:6. doi: 10.1186/s41073-017-0032-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu J, Kim K, Kurtz M, et al. Mentored peer reviewing for PhD faculty and students. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;37:1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.11.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon JY, Bulk LY, Giannone Z, et al. Collaborative peer review process as an informal interprofessional learning tool: Findings from an exploratory study. J Interprof Care. 2018;32(1):101–103. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1358156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durning SJ, Carline JD. Review Criteria for Research Manuscripts: A Joint Project of Academic Medicine and the Group on Educational Affairs' Medical Education Scholarship Research and Evaluation Section. 2015. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.
   Google Scholar
• Bordage G, et al. Review criteria for research manuscripts, Joint Task Force of Academic Medicine and the GEA-RIME Committee. Acad Med. 2001;76(9):920–921. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200109000-00014.
   Google Scholar
• Turner L. Promoting FAITH in peer review: Five core attributes of effective peer review. J Acad Ethics. 2003;1(2):181–188. doi: 10.1023/B:JAET.0000006844.09724.98.
   Google Scholar
• Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach. 2006;28(6):497–526. doi: 10.1080/01421590600902976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean M, Cilliers F, Van Wyk JM. Faculty development: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Med Teach. 2008;30(6):555–584. doi: 10.1080/01421590802109834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan PS, Irby DM. Reframing research on faculty development. Acad Med. 86(4):421–428. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820dc058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. 1991. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garet MS, Porter AC, Desimone L, et al. What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. Am Educ Res J. 2001;38(4):915–945. doi: 10.3102/00028312038004915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gast I, Schildkamp K, Veen JTvd. Team-based professional development interventions in higher education: a systematic review. Rev Educ Res. 2017;87(4):736–767. doi: 10.3102/0034654317704306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone LM, Porter AC, Garet MS, et al. Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 2002;24(2):81–112. doi: 10.3102/01623737024002081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert Y. Faculty development: from workshops to communities of practice. Med Teach. 2010;32(5):425–428. doi: 10.3109/01421591003677897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott J. Action Research for Educational Change. 1993. Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald C. Understanding participatory action research: a qualitative research methodology option. Can J Action Res. 2012;13(2):34–50.
   Google Scholar
• AHRQ. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. 2008. https://innovations.ahrq.gov/qualitytools/plan-do-study-act-pdsa-cycle#.XNMF–Q5tS4.email. Accessed May 9, 2019.
   Google Scholar