Going Beyond “Not Enough Time”: Barriers to Preparing Manuscripts for Academic Medical Journals

References

• Drury NE, Maniakis-Grivas G, Rogers VJ, et al. The fate of abstracts presented at annual meetings of the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain and Ireland from 1993 to 2007. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42(5):885–89. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Guyatt GH, et al. An observational study of orthopaedic abstracts and subsequent full-text publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(4):615–21. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200204000-00017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autorino R, Quarto G, Di Lorenzo G, et al. Are abstracts presented at the EAU meeting followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals? A critical analysis. Eur Urol. 2007;51(3):833–40; discussion 40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer RW, Dickersin K, Langenberg P. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1994;272(2):158–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones CW, Handler L, Crowell KE, et al. Non-publication of large randomized clinical trials: cross sectional analysis. BMJ. 2013;347:f6104. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riveros C, Dechartres A, Perrodeau E, et al. Timing and completeness of trial results posted at ClinicalTrials.gov and published in journals. PLoS Med. 2013;10(12):e1001566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross JS, Tse T, Zarin DA, et al. Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis. BMJ. 2012;344:d7292. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okike K, Kocher MS, Nwachukwu BU, et al. The fate of manuscripts rejected by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(17):e130. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00078.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Armstrong AW, Idriss SZ, Kimball AB, et al. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(4):632–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.12.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberzweig JE, Khorsandi AS. Outcomes of rejected Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology manuscripts. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19(11):1620–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2008.06.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmucker C, Schell LK, Portalupi S, et al. Extent of non-publication in cohorts of studies approved by research ethics committees or included in trial registries. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers I. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1405–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer RW, Ugarte-Gil C, Schmucker C, et al. Authors report lack of time as main reason for unpublished research presented at biomedical conferences: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(7):803–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajjawi R, Crampton PES, Rees CE. What really matters for successful research environments? A realist synthesis. Med Educ. 2018;52:936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariail J, Thomas S, Smith T, et al. The value of a writing center at a medical university. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25(2):129–33. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2013.770739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miedzinski LJ, Davis P, Al-Shurafa H, et al. A Canadian faculty of medicine and dentistry’s survey of career development needs. Med Educ. 2001;35(9):890–900. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.01002.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzyzanowska MK, Pintilie M, Tannock IF. Factors associated with failure to publish large randomized trials presented at an oncology meeting. JAMA. 2003;290(4):495–501. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.4.495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartling L, Craig WR, Russell K, et al. Factors influencing the publication of randomized controlled trials in child health research. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(10):983–7. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.10.983.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duracinsky M, Lalanne C, Rous L, et al. Barriers to publishing in biomedical journals perceived by a sample of French researchers: results of the DIAzePAM study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0371-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Timmer A, Blum T, Lankisch PG. Publication rates following pancreas meetings. Pancreas. 2001;23(2):212–5. doi: 10.1097/00006676-200108000-00012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprague S, Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, et al. Barriers to full-text publication following presentation of abstracts at annual orthopaedic meetings. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(1):158–63. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00024.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Office of Research Integrity [US Dept of Health & Human Services]. Definition of research misconduct [Internet]. https://ori.hhs.gov/definition-misconduct. Accessed May 15, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Research Integrity [US Dept of Health & Human Services]. Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: a guide to ethical writing [Internet]. https://ori.hhs.gov/content/avoiding-plagiarism-self-plagiarism-and-other-questionable-writing-practices-guide-ethical-writing. Accessed May 28, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Artino AR, Jr., Durning SJ, Sklar DP. Guidelines for reporting survey-based research submitted to Academic Medicine. Acad Med. 2018;93(3):337–40. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantiative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Sage Publications, Inc: Thousand Oaks, CA; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Freelon D. ReCal OIR: ordinal, interval, and ratio intercoder reliability as a web service. Int J Internet Sci. 2013;8(1):10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Freelon D. ReCal: intercoder reliability calculation as a web service. Int J Internet Sci. 2010;5(1):20–33.
   Google Scholar
• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Defining the role of authors and contributors. http://icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html. 2018. Accessed November 20, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Eisen AE, Douglas C. A model for postdoctoral education that promotes minority and majority success in the biomedical sciences. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018;16:ar65. CrossRef][https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-03-0051]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross RG, Greco-Sanders L, Laudenslager M. An institutional postdoctoral research training program: increasing productivity of postdoctoral trainees. Acad Psychiatry. 2016;40(2):207–12. doi: 10.1007/s40596-015-0281-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rørstad K, Aksnes DW. Publication rate expressed by age, gender and academic position—a large-scale analysis of Norwegian academic staff. J Informetrics. 2015;9(2):317–33. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauber CM, Stee LM, Jenkins SM, et al. Submission and peer review frequencies before acceptance: an analysis of submissions by Mayo Clinic Section of Scientific Publications, 2006. International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication; Sep 10–12; Vancouver, BC, Canada 2009. p. 52–3.
   Google Scholar
• Charon R. The patient-physician relationship. Narrative medicine: a model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA. 2001;286(15):1897–902. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.15.1897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaDonna KA, Taylor T, Lingard L. Why open-ended survey questions are unlikely to support rigorous qualitative insights. Acad Med. 2018;93(3):347–9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reader S, Fornari A, Simon S, et al. Promoting faculty scholarship–an evaluation of a program for busy clinician-educators. Can Med Educ J. 2015;6(1):e43–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, et al. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(8):834–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopen G, Swan J. The science of scientific writing [Internet]. American Scientist. https://www.americanscientist.org/blog/the-long-view/the-science-of-scientific-writing. 1990. Accessed May 15, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Schimel J. Writing Science: How to Write Papers That Get Cited and Proposals That Get Funded. Oxford University Press: New York, NY; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gastel B, Day RA. How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper. 8th ed. Greenwood: Santa Barbara, CA; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Zeiger M. Essentials of Writing Biomedical Research Papers. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.: New York, NY; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison DC, Papasian CJ, Russell SW. Writing for Biomedical Publication. Buellton, CA: Grant Writers’ Seminars and Workshops, LLC; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Pololi L, Knight S, Dunn K. Facilitating scholarly writing in academic medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(1):64–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.21143.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon C, Jamadar D, Girish G, et al. Peer support of a faculty “writers’ circle” increases confidence and productivity in generating scholarship. Acad Radiol. 2015;22(4):534–8. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussey-Jones J, Bernstein L, Higgins S, et al. Repaving the road to academic success: the IMeRGE approach to peer mentoring. Acad Med. 2006;81(7):674–9. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000232425.27041.88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar