1,231
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Lakeshore and littoral physical habitat structure: A field survey method and its precision

, , , , &

References

  • Allen AP, Whittier TR, Kaufmann PR, Larsen DP, O’Conner RJ, Hughes RM, Stemberger RS, Dixit SS, Brinkhurst RO, Herlihy AT, Paulsen SG. 1999. Concordance of taxonomic richness patterns across multiple assemblages in lakes of the northeastern United States. Can J Fish Aquatic Sci. 56:739–747.
  • Bain MB, Finn JT, Booke HE. 1985. Quantifying stream substrate for habitat analysis studies. N Am J Fish Manage. 5:499–500.
  • Faustini JM, Kaufmann PR. 2007. Adequacy of visually classified particle count statistics from regional stream habitat surveys. J Am Water Resour As. 43:1293–1315.
  • Hart JF. 1984. Resort areas in Wisconsin. Geogr Rev. 74:192–217.
  • Hughes RM, Paulsen SG, Stoddard JL. 2000. EMAP-Surface Waters: a national, multiassemblage, probability survey of ecological integrity. Hydrobiologia. 422/423:429–443.
  • Hughes RM, Peck DV. 2008. Acquiring data for large aquatic resource surveys: the art of compromise among science, logistics, and reality. J N Am Benthol Soc. 27:837–859.
  • Hutchinson GE. 1957. A Treatise on Limnology, Vol. I: Geography, Physics and Chemistry. New York: Wiley.
  • Jennings MJ, Bozek MA, Hatzenbeler GR, Emmons EE, Staggs MD. 1999. Cumulative effects of incremental shoreline habitat modification on fish assemblages in north temperate lakes. N Am J Fish Manage. 19:18–27.
  • Kaufmann PR. 1993. Physical habitat. In: Hughes RM, editor. Stream Indicator and Design Workshop. Corvallis (OR ): US Environmental Protection Agency; EPA/600/R-93/138. p. 59–69.
  • Kaufmann PR, Hughes RM. 2006. Geomorphic and anthropogenic influences on fish and amphibians in Pacific Northwest coastal streams. In: Hughes RM, Wang L, Seelbach PW, editors. Landscape influences on stream habitat and biological assemblages. American Fisheries Society Symposium 48. Bethesda (MD). p. 429–455.
  • Kaufmann PR, Hughes RM, Whittier TR, Bryce SA, Paulsen SG. ( 2014a). Relevance of lake physical habitat assessment indices to fish and riparian birds. . Lake Reservoir Manage. 30:177–191.
  • Kaufmann PR, Larsen DP, Faustini JM. 2009. Bed stability and sedimentation associated with human disturbances in Pacific Northwest streams. J Am Water Resour As. 45:434–459.
  • Kaufmann PR, Levine P, Robison EG, Seeliger C, Peck DV. 1999. Quantifying physical habitat in wadeable streams. Washington (DC ): US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development; EPA/620/R-99/003; [cited Apr 2011]. . Available from: http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/surfwatr/field/phyhab.html
  • Kaufmann PR, Peck DV, Paulsen SG, Seeliger CW, Hughes RM, Whittier TC, Kamman NC. (. 2014b). Lake shoreline and littoral habitat structure and disturbance in a national lakes assessment. Lake Reservoir Manage. . 30:192–215.
  • Kaufmann PR, Whittier TR. 1997. Habitat assessment. In: Baker JR, Peck DV, Sutton DW, editors. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program - Surface Waters: field operations manual for lakes. Washington (DC ): US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development; EPA/620/R-97/001. p. . 5-1 to 5-26.
  • Kincaid TM, Larsen DP, Urquhart NS. 2004. The structure of variation and its influence on the estimation of status: indicators of condition of lakes in the Northeast USA. Environ Monit Assess. 98:1–21.
  • Larsen DP, Christie SJ, editors. 1993. EMAP-Surface Waters 1991 Pilot Report. Washington (DC ): US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development; EPA/620/R-93/003.
  • Larsen DP, Kaufmann PR, Kincaid TM, Urquhart NS. 2004. Detecting persistent change in the habitat of salmon-bearing streams in the Pacific Northwest. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 61:283–291.
  • Larsen DP, Kinkaid TM, Jacobs SE, Urquhart NS. 2001. Designs for evaluating local and regional scale trends. BioScience. 51(12):1069–1078.
  • Larsen DP, Thornton KW, Urquhart NS, Paulsen SG. 1994. The role of sample surveys for monitoring the condition of the Nation's lakes. Environ Monit Assess. 32:101–134.
  • Larsen DP, Urquhart NS. 1993. A framework for evaluating the sensitivity of the EMAP design. In Larsen DP, Christie SJ, editors. EMAP-Surface Waters 1991 Pilot Report. Washington, (DC ): US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development; EPA/620/R-93/003. p. 119–155.
  • Littel RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O. 2006. SAS for mixed models, 2nd ed. Cary (NC ): SAS Institute. . 814 p.
  • MacDonald LH, Smart AW, Wismar RC. 1991. Monitoring guidelines to evaluate effects of forestry activities on streams in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska. Seattle (WA ): US Environmental Protection Agency, Region X; EPA 910/9-91-001.
  • Macedo DR, Ligeiro R, Ferreira WR, Junqueira NT, Sanches BO, Silva DRO, Alves CBM, Hughes RM, Kaufmann PR, Pompeu PS, et al. 2012. Parâmetros biológicos e de habitats físicos para avaliação de bacias no Sudeste do Brasil. Ação Ambiental. 47:15–18.
  • Molozzi J, França JS, Araujo TLA, Viana TH, Hughes RM, Callisto M. 2011. Diversidade de habitats físicos e sua relação com macroinvertebrados bentônicos em reservatórios urbanos. Iheringia Sér Zool. 101:191–199.
  • Omernik JM. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 77:118–125.
  • Paulsen SG, Larsen DP, Kaufmann PR, Whittier TR, Baker JR, Peck DV, Mcgue J. Stevens D, Stoddard J, Hughes RM, et al. 1991. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP)–Surface waters monitoring and research strategy. Corvallis (OR ): US Environmental Protection Agency.
  • Paulsen SG, Mayio A, Peck DV, Stoddard JL, Tarquinio E, Holdsworth SM, Van Sickle J, Yuan LL, Hawkins CP, Herlihy AT, et al. 2008. Condition of stream ecosystems in the US: an overview of the first national assessment. J N Am Benthol Soc. 27:812–821.
  • Peck DV, Herlihy AT, Hill BH, Hughes RM, Kaufmann PR, Klemm DJ, Lazorchak JM, McCormick FH, Peterson SA, Ringold PL, et al. 2006. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program – Surface Waters: Western pilot study field operations manual for wadeable streams. Washington (DC ): US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development; EPA/620/R-06/003.
  • Peck DV, Olsen AR, Weber MH, Paulsen SG, Peterson C, Holdsworth SM. 2013. Survey design and extent estimates for the National Lakes Assessment. Freshwater Sci. 32:1231–1245.
  • Platts WS, Megahan WF, Minshall GW. 1983. Methods for evaluating stream, riparian and biotic conditions. Ogden (UT ): US Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station; Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-138.
  • Rowan JS, Carwardine J, Duck RW, Bragg OM, Black AR, Cutler JEJ, Soutar I, Boon PJ. 2006. Development of a technique for Lake Habitat Survey (LHS) with applications for the European Union Water Framework Directive. Aquat Conserv. 16:637–657.
  • Sass GG, Kitchell JE, Carpenter SR, Hrabik TR, Marburg AE, Turner MG. 2006. Fish community and food web responses to a whole-lake removal of coarse woody habitat. Fisheries. 31:321–330.
  • Schindler DE, Scheuerell MD. 2002. Habitat coupling in lake ecosystems. Oikos. 98:177–189.
  • Shapiro MH, Holdsworth SM, Paulsen SG. 2008. The need to assess the condition of aquatic resources in the US. J N Am Benthol Soc. 27:808–811.
  • Stoddard JL, Herlihy AT, Hill BH, Hughes RM, Kaufmann PR, Klemm DJ, Lazorchak JM, McCormick FH, Peck DV, Paulsen SG, et al. 2006. Mid- Atlantic Integrated Assessment (MAIA): state of the flowing waters report. Washington (DC ): US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development; EPA/620/R-06/001.
  • Stoddard JL, Peck DV, Olsen AR, Larsen DP, Van Sickle J, Hawkins CP, Hughes RM, Whittier TR, Lomnicky G, Herlihy AT, et al. 2005a. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) — Western streams and rivers statistical summary. Washington (DC ): US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development; EPA 620/R-05/006.
  • Stoddard JL, Peck DV, Paulsen SG, Van Sickle J, Hawkins CP, Herlihy AT, Hughes RM, Kaufmann PR, Larsen DP, Lomnicky G, et al. 2005b. An ecological assessment of western streams and rivers. Washington (DC ): US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development; EPA 620/R- 05/005.
  • Thomas GL, Thiesfeld SL, Bonar SA, Crittenden RN, Pauley GB. 1990. Estimation of submergent plant bed biovolume using acoustic range information. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 47:805–812.
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2007. Survey of the nation's lakes. Field operations manual. Washington (DC ): US Environmental Protection Agency; EPA 841—B—07—004.
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2009. National Lakes Assessment—a collaborative survey of the Nation's lakes. Washington (DC ): US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water; EPA 841-R-09-001.
  • [USEPA] US Environmental Protection Agency. 2013. National River and Stream Assessment – a collaborative survey. Washington (DC ): US Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Research and Development; Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Water; EPA/841/D-13/001.
  • Van Sickle J. 2013. Estimating the risks of multiple, covarying stressors in the National Lakes Assessment. Freshwater Sci. 32:204–216.
  • Van Sickle J, Hawkins CP, Larsen DP, Herlihy AT. 2005. A null model for the expected macroinvertebrate assemblage in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc. 24(1):178–191.
  • Wetzel RG, Likens GE. 1991. Limnological Analyses. New York (NY ): Springer-Verlag.
  • Whittier TR, Paulsen SG, Larsen DP, Peterson SA, Herlihy AT, Kaufmann PR. 2002. Indicators of ecological stress and their extent in the population of northeastern lakes: a regional-scale assessment. BioScience. 52:235–247.
  • Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ ): Prentice-Hall.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.