Regulatory protection and definition for recreational uses of Florida lakes

References

• Bachmann RW, Bigham DL, Hoyer MV, Canfield DE Jr. 2012a. A strategy for establishing numeric nutrient criteria for Florida lakes. Lake Reservoir Manage. 28:84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann RW, Bigham DL, Hoyer MV, Canfield DE Jr. 2012b. Phosphorus, nitrogen and the designated uses of Florida lakes. Lake Reservoir Manage. 28:84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett JE, Kotrilik JW, Higgins CC. 2001. Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. ITLPJ. 19:43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bockstael NE, McConnell KE, Strand IE. 1989. Measuring the benefits of improvements in water quality: The Chesapeake Bay. Mar Resour Econ. 6(1):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti SP, Halgin DS. 1999. Elicitation techniques for cultural domain analysis. In: Schensul J, LeCompte MD, Nastasi BK, Borgatti SP, editors. Enhanced Ethnographic Methods. Walnut Creek (CA): AltaMira. p. 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Canfield DE Jr, Hoyer MV. 1988. Regional geology and the chemical and trophic state characteristics of Florida lakes. Lake Reserv Manage. 4(1):21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran WG. 1977. Sampling techniques, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ditton RB, Goodale TL. 1973. Water quality perception and the recreational uses of Green Bay, Lake Michigan. Wat Resour Res. 9(3):11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Failing L, Gregory R, Harstone M. 2007. Integrating science and local knowledge in environmental risk management: A decision-focused approach. Ecol Econ. 64:47–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Register. 2010. Environmental Protection Agency water quality standards for the state of Florida's lakes and flowing waters: Final rule. 40 CFR Part 131.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Water Pollution Control Act. 2002. 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. . Available from: http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/cwa.cfm?prog-ram_id=45
   Google Scholar
• Gamson WA. 1968. Power and discontent. Homewood (IL): Dorsey.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Barrios LE, Speelman EN, Pimm MS. 2008. An educational simulation tool for negotiating sustainable natural resource management strategies among stakeholders with conflicting interests. Ecol Model. 210:115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleick PH. 2007. Water and conflict: Fresh water resources and international security. Int Security. 18:79–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale BW, Adams MS. 2007. Ecosystem management and the conservation of river-floodplain systems. Landscape Urban Plan. 80:23–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkila T, Gerlak AK. 2005. The formation of large-scale collaborative resource management institutions: Clarifying the roles of stakeholders, science, and institutions. Policy Stud J 33:583–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiskary S, Wison B. 2008. Minnesota's approach to lake nutrient criteria development. Lake Reserv Manage. 24:282–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes J, Clark R. 2008. Enhancing the use of science in environmental policy-making and regulation. Environ Sci Policy. 11:702–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyer MV, Brown CD, Canfield DE. 2004. Relations between water chemistry and water quality as defined by lake users in Florida. Lake Reservoir Manage. 20:240–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendis-Millard S, Reed MG. 2007. Understanding community capacity using adaptive and reflexive research practices: Lessons from two Canadian biosphere reserves. Soc Natur Resour. 20:543–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needelman MS, Kealy MJ. 1995. Recreational swimming benefits of New Hampshire lake water quality policies: an application of a repeated discrete choice model. Agric Resour Econ Rev. 24(1):78–87.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl C. 2002. Towards sustainability in the water sector- the importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquat Sci. 64:394–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkerton E, John L. 2008. Creating local management legitimacy. Mar Policy. 32:680–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan M. 2005. Considerations for collecting freelists in the field: Examples from ethnobotany. Field Method. 17:219–234.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber SG. 2004. Adaptive management: A synthesis of current understanding and effective application. Ecol Manag Restor. 5:177–182.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon EE, Brezonik PL. 1972a. Limnological characteristics of north and central Florida lakes. Limnol Oceanogr. 17:97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon EE, Brezonik PL. 1972b. Relations between lake trophic state and nitrogen and phosphorus loading rates. Environ Sci Technol. 6:719–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [USEPA] United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. Water: Use attainability analysis. . Available from: http://water.epa.gov/ scitech/ swguidance/standards/uses/uaa/info.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Willson D, Wagner A. 2001. Evaluating alternative raking approaches. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, . 5–9 August 2001.
   Google Scholar