The relative influences of fine and landscape scale factors on the structure of lentic plant assemblages

References

• Alahuhta J, Kanninen A, Hellsten S, Kari-Matti V, Kuoppala M, Hamalainen H. 2013. Environmental and spatial correlates of community composition, richness and status of boreal lake macrophytes. Ecol Indic. 32:172–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barko JW, Smart RM. 1986. Sediment-related mechanisms of growth limitation in submersed macrophytes. Ecology. 67:1328–1340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology. 73:1045–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canavan RW, Siver PA. 1995. Connecticut lakes: a study of the chemical and physical properties of fifty-six Connecticut lakes. New London (CT): Connecticut College Arboretum.
   Google Scholar
• Capers R, Selsky R, Bugbee GJ. 2009a. The relative importance of local conditions and regional processes in structuring aquatic plant communities. Freshwater Biol. 55:952–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capers RS, Selsky R, Bugbee GB, White JC. 2009b. Species richness of both native and invasive aquatic plants influenced by environmental conditions and human activity. Botany. 87:306–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements FE. 1916. Plant succession: an analysis of development of vegetation. Washington (DC): Carnegie Institution of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Deevey ES. 1940. Limnological studies in Connecticut: a contribution to regional limnology. Am J Sci. 238:717–741.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton AD, Clescenti LS, Greenberg AE. 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater 19^th ed.Washington (DC): American Public Health Association.
   Google Scholar
• Frink CR, Norvell WA. 1984. Chemical and physical properties of Connecticut lakes. New Haven (CT): Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson DJ, Ely JS, Collins SL. 1999. The core satellite hypothesis provides a theoretical basis for dominant, subordinate, and transient species. J Ecol. 87:1064–1067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason HA. 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull Torrey Bot Club. 53:7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gotelli NJ, McCabe DJ. 2002. Species co-occurance: a meta-analysis of J.M. Diamond's assembly rules model. Ecology. 83:2091–2096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotelli NJ, Simberloff D. 1987. The distribution and abundance of tallgrass prairie plants: a test of the core-satellite hypothesis. Am Nat. 130:18–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu B, Hoyer MV. 2005. Community structure and environmental conditions in Florida shallow lakes dominated by aquatic vegetation. Lake Reserv Manage. 21:403–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heegaard E, Birks HH, Gibson CE, Smith SJ, Wolfe-Murphy S. 2001. Species-environmental relationships of aquatic macrophytes in Northern Ireland. Aquat Bot. 70:175–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellquist CB. 1980. Correlation of alkalinity and the distribution of Potamogeton in New England. Rhodora. 82:331–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson ST, Charles DF. 1987. Aquatic macrophytes in Adirondack (New York) Lakes: patterns of species composition in relation to environment. Can J Bot. 66:1449–1459.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs MJ, MacIsaac HJ. 2009. Modelling spread of the invasive macrophyte Cabomba caroliniana. Freshwater Biol. 54:296–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone M, Coffey BT, Howard-Williams C. 1985. The role of recreational boat traffic in interlake dispersal of macrophytes: a New Zealand case study. J Environ Manage. 20:263–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• June-Wells MR, Gallagher F, Gibbons J, Bugbee GJ. 2013. Water chemistry preferences of five non-native aquatic macrophyte species in Connecticut: a preliminary risk assessment tool. Lake Reserv Manage. 29:303–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadono Y. 1982a. Distribution and habitat of Japanese Potamogeton. Tokyo Bot Mag. 95:63–76.
   Google Scholar
• Kadono Y. 1982b. Occurrence of aquatic macrophytes in relation to pH, alkalinity, calcium, chloride, and conductivity. Japn J Ecol. 32:39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Keddy PA. 1992. A Pragmatic approach to functional ecology. Funct Ecol. 6:621–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacoul P, Freedman B. 2006. Relationships between aquatic plants and environmental factors along a steep Himalayan altitudinal gradient. Aquat Bot. 84:3–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Legendre D. 1998. Numerical ecology, 2^nd ed. Amsterdam (Netherlands): Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Magurran AE. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurements. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden L, Heynen N, Oslender U, West P, Kassam KA, Robbins P. 2013. Global assemblages, resilience, and earth stewardship in the anthropocene. Front Ecol Environ. 7:341–348.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts D, Singer R, Boyle CW. 1985. The submersed macrophyte communities of Adirondack lakes (NY, USA) of varying degrees of acidity. Aquat Bot. 21:21–235.
   Google Scholar
• Søndergaard M. 2007. Nutrient dynamics in lakes – with emphasis on phosphorus, sediment and lake restorations [dissertation]. [Aarhus (Denmark)]: University of Aarhus, National Environmental Research Institute. 276 p.
   Google Scholar
• Thum RA, Lennon JT. 2010. Comparative ecological niche models predict invasive spread of Variable Leaf Milfoil (Myriophyllum heterophyllum) and its potential imact on closely related native species. Biol Invasions. 12:133–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilman D. 1981. Tests of resource competition theory using four species of Lake Michigan algae. Ecology. 62:802–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilman D. 1987. On the meaning of competition and the mechanisms of competitive superiority. Funct Ecol. 1:304–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilman D. 2004. Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. P Natl Acad Sci. 101:10854–10861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valiente-Banuet A, Verdú M. 2013. Human impacts on multiple ecological networks act synergystically to drive ecosystem collapse. Front Ecol Environ. 8:408–413.
   Google Scholar
• Weiher E, Keddy P. 1995. The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities. Oikos. 73:323–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzel RG, Brammer ES, Forsberg C. 1984. Photosynthesis of submersed macrophytes in acidified lakes. I. Carbon fluxes and recycling of CO2 in Juncus bulbosus L. Aquat Bot. 19:329–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzel RG, Brammer ES, Lindstrom K, Forsberg C. 1985. Photosythesis of submersed macrophytes in acidified lakes. II. Carbon limitation and utilization of benthic CO2 sources. Aquat Bot. 22:107–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker RJ, Woodwell GM. 1971. Evolution of natural communities. Ecosystem and structure. In: Weins JA, editor. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Biological Colloquium. Corvallis (OR): Oregon University Press. p. 137–159.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson J. 1999. Assembly rules in a plant community. In: Weiher E, Keddy P, editors. Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar