Advancing aquatic vegetation management for fish in north temperate lakes

References

• Aller EA, Gullstrom M, Maarse F, Gren M, Nordlund LM, Jiddawi N, Eklof JS. 2014. Single and joint effects of regional- and local-scale variables on tropical seagrass fish assemblages. Mar Biol. 161:2395–2405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck MW, Vondracek B, Hatch LK. 2013. Between- and within-lake responses of macrophyte richness metrics to shoreline development. Lake Reserv Manage. 29(3):179–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blandon A, zu Ermgassen P. 2014. Quantitative estimate of commercial fish enhancement by seagrass habitat in southern Australia. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 141:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borman SC, Galatowitsch SM, Newman RM. 2009. The effects of species immigrations and changing conditions on isoetid communities. Aquat Bot. 91(3):143–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter SR, Lodge DM. 1986. Effects of submersed macrophytes on ecosystem processes. Aquat Bot. 26:341–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheruvelil KS, Nate NA, Soranno PA, Bremigan MT. 2005. Lack of a unimodal relationship between fish growth and macrophyte cover in 45 north temperate lakes. Arch Hydrobiol. 164(2):193–215.
   Google Scholar
• Connell SD, Fernandes M, Burnell OW, Doubleday ZA, Griffin KJ, Irving AD, Leung JYS, Owen S, Russell BD, Falkenberg LJ. 2017. Testing for thresholds of ecosystem collapse in seagrass meadows. Conserv Biol. 31(5):1196–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross T, McInerny M. 2006. Relationships between aquatic plant cover and fish populations based on Minnesota lake survey data. Fisheries Management Section Investigational Report 537, St. Paul, (MN): Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnhöfer K, Oppelt N. 2016. Remote sensing for lake research and monitoring – recent advances. Ecol Indic. 64:105–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dustin DL, Vondracek B. 2017. Nearshore habitat and fish assemblages along a gradient of shoreline development. N Am J Fish Manage. 37(2):432–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot SAM, Sabatino AD, Heath MR, Turrell WR, Bailey DM. 2017. Landscape effects on demersal fish revealed by field observations and predictive seabed modeling. PLoS One. 12(12):e0189011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel S. 1995. Eurasian watermilfoil as a fishery management tool. Fisheries. 20(3):20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans JM. 2008. Ecosystem implications of invasive aquatic plants and aquatic plant control in Florida Springs. In: Summary and synthesis of the available literature on the effects of nutrients on spring organisms and systems. Gainesville (FL): University of Florida Water Institute; p. 231–270.
   Google Scholar
• Genkai-Kato M, Carpenter S. 2005. Eutrophication due to phosphorus recycling in relation to lake morphometry, temperature, and macrophytes. Ecology. 86(1):210–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck KL, Hays G, Orth RJ. 2003. Critical evaluation of the nursery role hypothesis for seagrass meadows. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 253:123–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemminga M, Duarte CM. 2000. Seagrass ecology. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson CJ, Olds AD, Lee SY, Gilby BL, Maxwell PS, Connolly RM, Stevens T. 2017. Marine reserves and seascape context shape fish assemblages in seagrass ecosystems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 566:135–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovel KA, Warneke AM, Virtue-Hilborn SP, Sanchez AE. 2016. Mesopredator foraging success in eelgrass (Zostera marina L.): relative effects of epiphytes, shoot density, and prey abundance. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 474:142–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijbers CM, Nagelkerken I, Layman CA. 2015. Fish movement from nursery bays to coral reefs: a matter of size? Hydrobiologia. 750(1):89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson EL, Rees SE, Wilding C, Attrill MJ. 2015. Use of a seagrass residency index to apportion commercial fishery landing values and recreation fisheries expenditure to seagrass habitat service. Conserv Biol. 29(3):899–909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings MJ, Emmons EE, Hatzenbeler GR, Edwards C, Bozek MA. 2003. Is littoral habitat affected by residential development and land use in watersheds of Wisconsin lakes? Lake Reserv Manage. 19(3):272–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeppesen E, Sondergaard M, Christophersen K. 1998. The structuring role of submerged macrophytes in lakes. Berlin (Germany): Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kapuscinski K, Farrell J. 2014. Habitat factors influencing fish assemblages at muskellunge nursery sites. J Great Lakes Res. 40:135–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy LA, Juanes F, El-Sabaawi R. 2018. Eelgrass as valuable nearshore foraging habitat for juvenile Pacific Salmon in the early marine period. Mar Coast Fish. 10(2):190–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovalenko KE, Johnson LB, Riseng CM, Cooper MJ, Johnson K, Mason LA, McKenna JE, JrSparks-Jackson BL, Uzarski DG. 2018. Great Lakes coastal fish habitat classification and assessment. J Great Lakes Res. 44(5):1100–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak S-N, Park J-M, Huh S-H. 2014. Seasonal variations in species composition and abundance of fish and decapods in an eelgrass (Zostera marina) bed of Jindong Bay. J Korean Soc Mar Env & Safety. 20(3):259–269.
   Google Scholar
• Larkum AW, Orth RRJ, Duarte CM. 2006. Seagrasses: biology, ecology, and conservation. Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lefcheck JS, Wilcox DJ, Murphy RR, Marion SR, Orth RJ. 2017. Multiple stressors threaten the imperiled coastal foundation species eelgrass (Zostera marina) in Chesapeake Bay, USA. Glob Chang Biol. 23(9):3474–3483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Les DH, Cleland MA, Waycott M. 1997. Phylogenetic studies in Alismatidae, II: evolution of marine angiosperms (seagrasses) and hydrophily. Syst Bot. 22(3):443–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikulyuk A, Sharma S, Van Egeren S, Erdmann E, Nault ME, Hauxwell J. 2011. The relative role of environmental, spatial, and land-use patterns in explaining aquatic macrophyte community composition. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 68(10):1778–1789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyle JB. 1945. Some chemical factors influencing the distribution of aquatic plants in Minnesota. Am Midl Nat. 34(2):402–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namba M, Lotze HK, Schmidt AL. 2018. Large-scale differences in community structure and ecosystem services of eelgrass (Zostera marina) beds across three regions in Eastern Canada. Estuar Coast. 41(1):177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohner J, Taylor WW, Hayes D, Roth BM. 2018. Influence of aquatic macrophytes on age-0 largemouth bass growth and diets. Trans Am Fish Soc. 147(4):758–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordlund LM, Koch EW, Barbier EB, Creed JC. 2016. Seagrass ecosystem services and their variability across genera and geographical regions. PLoS One. 11(10):e0163091. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olafsson E. 2016. Marine macrophytes as foundation species. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson MH, Carpenter SR, Cunningham P, Gafny S, Herwig B, Nibbelink NP, Pellett T, Storlie C, Trebitz A, Wilson K. 1998. Managing macrophytes to improve fish growth: a multi-lake experiment. Fisheries. 23(2):6–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perleberg D, Radomski P, Simon S, Carlson K, Millaway C, Knopik J, Holbrook B. 2019. Minnesota Lake Plant Survey Manual, for use by MNDNR Fisheries Section, EWR Lake Ecology Unit and EWR Biological Survey Unit. Brainerd (MN): Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Ecological and Water Resources Division.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips G, Willby N, Moss B. 2016. Submerged macrophyte declines in shallow lakes: what have we learnt in the last forty years? Aquat Bot. 135:37–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol Econ. 52(3):273–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt TC, Smokorowski KE. 2003. Fish habitat management implications of the summer habitat use by littoral fishes in a north temperate, mesotrophic lake. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 60(3):286–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radomski P. 2006. Historical changes in abundance of floating-leaf and emergent vegetation in Minnesota lakes. N Am J Fish Manage. 26(4):932–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radomski P, Bergquist LA, Duval M, Williquett A. 2010. Potential impacts of docks on littoral habitats in Minnesota lakes. Fisheries. 35(10):489–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radomski P, Holbrook BV. 2015. A comparison of two hydroacoustic methods for estimating submerged macrophyte distribution and abundance: a cautionary note. J Aquat Plant Manage. 53:151–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radomski P, Perleberg D. 2012. Application of a versatile aquatic macrophyte integrity index for Minnesota lakes. Ecol Indic. 20:252–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radomski P, Perleberg D. 2019. Avoiding the invasive trap: policies for aquatic non-indigenous plant management. Environ Values. 28(2):211–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed JR, Pereira DL. 2009. Relationships between shoreline development and nest site selection by black crappie and largemouth bass. N Am J Fish Manage. 29(4):943–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sass GG, Rypel AL, Stafford JD. 2017. Inland fisheries habitat management: lessons learned from wildlife ecology and a proposal for change. Fisheries. 42(4):197–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savino JF, Stein RA. 1982. Predator-prey interaction between large-mouth bass and bluegills as influenced by simulated, submersed vegetation. Trans Am Fish Soc. 111(3):255–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffer M. 1990. Multiplicity of stable states in freshwater systems. Hydrobiologia. 200/201:465–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert PR, Hukriede W, Karez R, Reusch TBH. 2015. Mapping and modeling of eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) distribution in the western Baltic Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 522:79–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short FT, Short CA, Novak A. 2016. Seagrasses. In: Finlayson CM, Milton GR, Prentice RC, Davidson NC, eds. The wetland book II: distribution, description and conservation. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smokorowski KE, Pratt TC. 2007. Effect of a change in physical structure and cover on fish and fish habitat in freshwater ecosystems: a review and meta-analysis. Environ Rev. 15:15–41.
   Google Scholar
• Sonoki S, Shao H, Morita Y, Minami K, Shoji J, Hori M, Miyashita K. 2016. Using acoustics to determine eelgrass bed distribution and to assess the seasonal variation of ecosystem service. PLoS One. 11(3):e0150890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavely TAB, Perry D, Lindborg R, Gullström M. 2017. Seascape structure and complexity influence temperate seagrass fish assemblage composition. Ecography. 40:936–946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunny AR. 2017. A review on effect of global climate change on seaweed and seagrass. Int J Fish Aquat Stud. 5(6):19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Thom RM, Southard S, Borde A. 2014. Climate-linked mechanisms driving spatial and temporal variation in eelgrass (Zosteria marina L.) growth and assemblage in Pacific Northwest estuaries, USA. J Coast Res. 68:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth RKF, McKenzie LJ, Collier CJ, Cullen-Unsworth LC, Duarte CM, Eklöf JS, Jarvis JC, Jones BL, Nordlund LM. 2018. Global challenges for seagrass conservation. Ambio. 2018:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2011. National survey of fishing, hunting and wildlife-associated recreation. Ann Arbor (MI): Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34699.v1.
   Google Scholar
• Valley RD. 2016. Spatial and temporal variation of aquatic plant abundance: quantifying change. J Aquat Plant Manage. 54:95–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valley RD, Bremigan MT. 2002. Effects of macrophyte bed architecture on largemouth bass foraging: implications of exotic macrophyte invasions. Trans Am Fish Soc. 113:234–244.
   Google Scholar
• Valley RD, Drake MT. 2007. What does resilience of a clear-water state in lakes mean for the spatial heterogeneity of submersed macrophyte biovolume? Aquatic Bot. 87(4):307–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valley RD, Habrat MD, Dibble ED, Drake MT. 2010. Movement patterns and habitat use of three declining littoral fish species in a north-temperate mesotrophic lake. Hydrobiologia. 644(1):385–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valley RD, Johnson MB, Dustin DL, Jones KD, Lauenstein MR, Nawrocki J. 2015. Combining hydroacoustic and point-intercept survey methods to assess aquatic plant species abundance patterns and community dominance. J Aquat Plant Manage. 53:121–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waycott M, Duarte CM, Carruthers TJB, Orth RJ, Dennison WC, Olyarnik S, Calladine A, Fourqurean JW, Heck KL, Hughes AR, et al. 2009. Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 106(30):12377–12381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzel RG. 2001. Limnology: lake and river ecosystems. San Diego (CA): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver MJ, Magnuson JJ, Clayton MK. 1997. Distribution of littoral fishes in structurally complex macrophytes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 54:2277–2289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar