Environmental determinants of coarse woody habitat in gravel pit lakes

References

• Ahrenstorff TD, Sass GG, Helmus MR. 2009. The influence of littoral zone coarse woody habitat on home range size, spatial distribution, and feeding ecology of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Hydrobiologia 623(1):223–233. doi: 10.1007/s10750-008-9660-1.
   Google Scholar
• [AdV] Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Vermessungsverwaltungen der Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Working Committee of the Surveying Authorities of the States of the Federal Republic of Germany] 2006. Documentation on the Modelling of Geoinformation of Official Surveying and Mapping (GeoInfoDok). Chapter 5; Section 5.4; Version 5.1; [cited 07 July 2023]. Available from https://www.adv-online.de
   Google Scholar
• Arlinghaus R, Cyrus E-M, Eschbach E, Fujitani M, Hühn D, Johnston F, Pagel T, Riepe C. 2015. Hand in Hand für eine nachhaltige Angelfischerei Ergebnisse und Empfehlungen aus fünf Jahren praxisorientierter Forschung zu Fischbesatz und seinen Alternativen. Vol. 28. Berlin: Berichte Des IGB.
   Google Scholar
• Arlinghaus R, Klefoth T, Matern S, Radinger J, Nikolaus R, Meyerhoff J, Schafft M, Cyrus E-M, Emmrich M, Hering D, et al. 2023. Biodiversität, Angeln und Gesellschaft: Wissensbasierte Empfehlungen für ein nachhaltiges Fischereimanagement an Baggerseen. Vol. 32. Berlin: Berichte des IGB.
   Google Scholar
• Arlinghaus R, Lorenzen K, Johnston BM, Cooke SJ, Cowx IG. 2016. Management of freshwater fisheries: addressing habitat, people and fishes In: Craig J, editor. Freshwater Fisheries Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Science. p. 557–579.
   Google Scholar
• Arlinghaus R, Mehner T. 2005. Determinants of management preferences of recreational anglers in Germany: Habitat management versus fish stocking. Limnologica 35(1-2):2–17. doi: 10.1016/j.limno.2004.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinghaus R, Riepe C, Theis S, Pagel T, Fujitani M. 2022. Dysfunctional information feedbacks cause the emergence of management panaceas in social-ecological systems: the case of fish stocking in inland recreational fisheries. J Outdoor Recreat. 38:100475. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2021.100475.
   Google Scholar
• Benke AC, Wallace JB. 2003. Influence of wood on invertebrate communities in streams and rivers In: Gregory SV, Boyer KL, Gurnell AM, editors. The ecology and management of wood in world rivers. Bethesda, Maryland: Am Fish Soc Symp. p.149–177.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs J, von Fumetti S, Kelly-Quinn M. 2017. The importance of small waterbodies for biodiversity and ecosystem services: implications for policy makers. Hydrobiologia 793(1):3–39. doi: 10.1007/s10750-016-3007-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchette ML, Lund MA. 2016. Pit lakes are a global legacy of mining: an integrated approach to achieving sustainable ecosystems and value for communities. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 23:28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozek MA. 2001. A second life for trees in lakes: as useful in water as they were on land. Lakeline.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, Skaug HJ, Machler M, Bolker BM. 2017. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. The R J. 9(2):378–400. doi: 10.32614/RJ-2017-066.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen DL, Herwig BR, Schindler DE, Carpenter SR. 1996. Impacts of lakeshore residential development on coarse woody debris in North Temperate Lakes. Ecol Appl.6(4):1143–1149. doi: 10.2307/2269598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craney TA, Surles JG. 2002. Model-dependent variance inflation factor cutoff values. Qual Eng. 14(3):391–403. doi: 10.1081/QEN-120001878.
   Google Scholar
• Czarnecka M. 2016. Coarse woody debris in temperate littoral zones: implications for biodiversity, food webs and lake management. Hydrobiologia 767(1):13–25. doi: 10.1007/s10750-015-2502-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnecka M, Pilotto F, Pusch MT. 2014. Is coarse woody debris in lakes a refuge or a trap for benthic invertebrates exposed to fish predation? Freshw Biol. 59(11):2400–2412. doi: 10.1111/fwb.12446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dossi F, Leitner P, Graf W. 2020. Age matters: substrate-specific colonization patterns of benthic invertebrates on installed large wood. Aquat Ecol. 54(3):741–760. doi: 10.1007/s10452-020-09772-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [DWD] Deutscher Wetterdienst [German Meteorological Service] 2018. Historical 10-minute station observation of max/min – mean wind speed and wind gust for Germany, version V1. [cited 07 July 2023]. https://www.dwd.de
   Google Scholar
• Eadie JMcA, Keast A. 1984. Resource heterogeneity and fish species diversity in lakes. Can J Zool. 62(9):1689–1695. doi: 10.1139/z84-248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaeta JW, Sass GG, Carpenter SR. 2014. Drought-driven lake level decline: effects on coarse woody habitat and fishes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 71(2):315–325. doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2013-0451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyette RP, Cole WG. 1999. Age characteristics of coarse woody debris (Pinus strobus) in a lake littoral zone. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 56(3):496–505. doi: 10.1139/f98-177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmus MR, Sass GG. 2008. The rapid effects of a whole-lake reduction of coarse woody debris on fish and benthic macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Biol. 53(7):1423–1433. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.01974.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ISO] International Organization for Standardization. 2004. Water quality – determination of phosphorus – ammonium molybdat spectrometric method.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings MJ, Emmons EE, Hatzenbeler GR, Edwards C, Bozek MA. 2003. Is littoral habitat affected by residential development and land use in watersheds of Wisconsin lakes? Lake Reserv Manag.19(3):272–279. doi: 10.1080/07438140309354092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston R, Jones K, Manley D. 2018. Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour. Qual Quant. 52(4):1957–1976. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0584-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaufmann PR, Peck DV, Paulsen SG, Seeliger CW, Hughes RM, Whittier TR, Kamman NC. 2014a. Lakeshore and littoral physical habitat structure in a national lakes assessment. Lake Reserv Manag. 30(2):192–215. doi: 10.1080/10402381.2014.906524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann PR, Hughes RM, Van Sickle J, Whittier TR, Seeliger CW, Paulsen SG. 2014b. Lakeshore and littoral physical habitat structure: a field survey method and its precision. Lake Reserv Manag. 30(2):157–176. doi: 10.1080/10402381.2013.877543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klefoth T, Wegener N, Meyerhoff J, Arlinghaus R. 2023. Do anglers and managers think similarly about stocking, habitat management and harvest regulations? Implications for the management of community-governed recreational fisheries. Fish Res. 260:106589. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovalenko KE, Thomaz SM, Warfe DM. 2012. Habitat complexity: approaches and future directions. Hydrobiologia 685(1):1–17. doi: 10.1007/s10750-011-0974-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson ZJ, Gaeta JW, Carpenter SR. 2011. Coarse woody habitat, lakeshore residential development, and largemouth bass nesting behavior. N Am J Fish Manag. 31(4):666–670. doi: 10.1080/02755947.2011.608990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin W-C, Mehner T, Ritterbusch D, Brämick U. 2014. The influence of anthropogenic shoreline changes on the littoral abundance of fish species in German lowland lakes varying in depth as determined by boosted regression trees. Hydrobiologia 724(1):293–306. doi: 10.1007/s10750-013-1746-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin W-C, Okun N, Mehner T. 2004. Determinants of the distribution of juvenile fish in the littoral area of a shallow lake. Freshwater Biol. 49(4):410–424. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01193.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maday A, Matern S, Monk CT, Klefoth T, Wolter C, Arlinghaus R. 2023. Seasonal and diurnal patterns of littoral microhabitat use by fish in gravel pit lakes, with special reference to supplemented deadwood brush piles. Hydrobiologia 850(7):1557–1581. doi: 10.1007/s10750-023-05152-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallory EC, Ridgway MS, Gordon AM, Kaushik NK. 2000. Distribution of woody debris in a small headwater lake, central Ontario, Canada. Fal. 148(4):587–606. doi: 10.1127/archiv-hydrobiol/148/2000/587.
   Google Scholar
• Mandrak NE, Crossman EJ. 1992. Postglacial dispersal of freshwater fishes into Ontario. Can J Zool. 70(11):2247–2259. doi: 10.1139/z92-302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marburg AE, Bassak SB, Kratz TK, Turner MG. 2009. The demography of coarse wood in north temperate lakes. Freshw Biol. 54(5):1110–1119. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02158.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marburg AE, Turner MG, Kratz TK. 2006. Natural and anthropogenic variation in coarse wood among and within lakes: coarse wood in lakes. J Ecol. 94(3):558–568. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01117.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matern S, Emmrich M, Klefoth T, Wolter C, Nikolaus R, Wegener N, Arlinghaus R. 2019. Effect of recreational-fisheries management on fish biodiversity in gravel pit lakes, with contrasts to unmanaged lakes. J Fish Biol. 94(6):865–881. doi: 10.1111/jfb.13989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matern S, Klefoth T, Wolter C, Arlinghaus R. 2021. Environmental determinants of fish abundance in the littoral zone of gravel pit lakes. Hydrobiologia 848(10):2449–2471. doi: 10.1007/s10750-021-04563-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matern S, Klefoth T, Wolter C, Hussner A, Simon J, Arlinghaus R. 2022. Fish community composition in small lakes: the impact of lake genesis and fisheries management. Freshw Biol. 67(12):2130–2147. doi: 10.1111/fwb.14001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff J, Klefoth T, Arlinghaus R. 2019. The value artificial lake ecosystems provide to recreational anglers: implications for management of biodiversity and outdoor recreation. J Environ Manage. 252:109580. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollema PN, Antonellini M. 2016. Water and (bio)chemical cycling in gravel pit lakes: a review and outlook. Earth Sci Rev. 159:247–270. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müllerová A, Řehounková K, Prach K. 2022. Succession of aquatic and littoral vegetation in disused sandpits. Land Degrad Dev. 33(2):257–268. doi: 10.1002/ldr.4142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naiman RJ, Décamps H. 1997. The ccology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 28(1):621–658. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.621.
   Google Scholar
• Nash KT, Hendry K, Cragg-Hine D. 1999. The use of brushwood bundles as fish spawning media: brushwood bundles as fish-spawning material. Fish Manag Ecol. 6(5):349–356. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2400.1999.00153.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbrey MG, Bozek MA, Jennings MJ, Cook JE. 2005. Branching complexity and morphological characteristics of coarse woody structure as lacustrine fish habitat. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 62(9):2110–2123. doi: 10.1139/f05-125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaus R, Matern S, Schafft M, Klefoth T, Maday A, Wolter C, Manfrin A, Lemm JU, Arlinghaus R. 2020. Einfluss anglerischer Bewirtschaftung auf die Biodiversität von Baggerseen: Eine vergleichende Studie verschiedener gewässergebundener Organismengruppen. Lauterbornia 87:153–187.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolaus R, Matern S, Schafft M, Maday A, Wolter C, Klefoth T, Arlinghaus R. 2022. Influence of protected riparian areas on habitat structure and biodiversity in and at small lakes managed by recreational fisheries. Fish Res. 256:106476. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaus R, Schafft M, Maday A, Klefoth T, Wolter C, Arlinghaus R. 2021. Status of aquatic and riparian biodiversity in artificial lake ecosystems with and without management for recreational fisheries: implications for conservation. Aquatic Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 31(1):153–172. doi: 10.1002/aqc.3481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole AC, Hanson KC, Cooke SJ. 2009. The effect of shoreline recreational angling activities on aquatic and riparian habitat within an urban environment: implications for conservation and management. Environ Manage. 44(2):324–334. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9299-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce JL, Mallory EC, Smokorowski KE. 2022. Downed wood dynamics in the riparian and littoral zone of small lakes in tolerant hardwood forests. Can J For Res. 52(5):751–768. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2021-0245.
   Google Scholar
• Pusey BJ, Arthington AH. 2003. Importance of the riparian zone to the conservation and management of freshwater fish: a review. Mar Freshwater Res. 54(1):1–16. doi: 10.1071/MF02041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QGIS Development Team. 2019. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation [cited 07 July 2023]. Retrieved from http://qgis.osgeo.org
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2019). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Radinger J, Matern S, Klefoth T, Wolter C, Feldhege F, Monk CM, Arlinghaus R. 2023. Ecosystem-based management outperforms species-focused stocking for enhancing fish populations. Science 379(6635):946–951. doi: 10.1126/science.adf0895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey-Boissezon A, Joye D. 2012. A temporary gravel pit as a biodiversity hotspot for aquatic plants in the Alps. Arch Des Sci. 65:177–190.
   Google Scholar
• Roth BM, Kaplan IC, Sass GG, Johnson PT, Marburg AE, Yannarell AC, Havlicek TD, Willis TV, Turner MG, Carpenter SR. 2007. Linking terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems: the role of woody habitat in lake food webs. Ecol Modell. 203(3-4):439–452. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoul F, Figuerola J, Green AJ. 2004. Importance of gravel pits for the conservation of waterbirds in the Garonne river floodplain (southwest France). Biodivers Conserv. 13(6):1231–1243. doi: 10.1023/B:BIOC.0000018154.02096.4b.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sass GG. 2009. Coarse woody debris in lakes and streams In: Likens GE, editor. Encyclopedia of Inland Waters. Oxford: Elsevier. Vol.1.
   Google Scholar
• Sass GG, Carpenter SR, Gaeta JW, Kitchell JF, Ahrenstorff TD. 2012. Whole-lake addition of coarse woody habitat: response of fish populations. Aquat Sci. 74(2):255–266. doi: 10.1007/s00027-011-0219-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafft M, Wegner B, Meyer N, Wolter C, Arlinghaus R. 2021. Ecological impacts of water-based recreational activities on freshwater ecosystems: a global meta-analysis. Proc Biol Sci. 288(1959):20211623. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler DE, Scheuerell MD. 2002. Habitat coupling in lake ecosystems. Oikos. 98(2):177–189. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980201.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seelen LMS, Teurlincx S, Armstrong MR, Lürling M, van Donk E, de Senerpont Domis LN. 2022. Serving many masters at once: a framework for assessing ecosystem services delivered by quarry lakes. Inland Waters. 12(1):121–137. doi: 10.1080/20442041.2021.1944765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seelen LMS, Teurlincx S, Bruinsma J, Huijsmans TMF, van Donk E, Lürling M, de Senerpont Domis LN. 2021. The value of novel ecosystems: disclosing the ecological quality of quarry lakes. Sci Total Environ. 769:144294. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smokorowski KE, Pearce JL, Geiling WD, Pratt TC. 2021. Wood removals from lakes may not necessarily elicit fish population responses. North Am J Fish Manage. 41(1):142–157. doi: 10.1002/nafm.10543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smokorowski KE, Pratt TC. 2007. Effect of a change in physical structure and cover on fish and fish habitat in freshwater ecosystems – a review and meta-analysis. Environ Rev. 15(NA):15–41. doi: 10.1139/a06-007.
   Google Scholar
• Smokorowski KE, Pratt TC, Cole WG, McEachern LJ, Mallory EC. 2006. Effects on periphyton and macroinvertebrates from removal of submerged wood in three Ontario lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 63(9):2038–2049. doi: 10.1139/f06-104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndergaard M, Lauridsen TL, Johansson LS, Jeppesen E. 2018. Gravel pit lakes in Denmark: chemical and biological state. Sci Total Environ. 612:9–17. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theis S, Ruppert JLW, Poesch MS. 2023. Coarse woody habitat use by local fish species and structural integrity of enhancements over time in a shallow northern boreal lake assessed in a Bayesian modelling approach. Ecol Solut Evid 4:e12200. doi: 10.1002/2688-8319.12200.
   Google Scholar
• Umweltbundesamt. 2021. Angelfischerei und Nachhaltigkeit in Österreich. Impulse zur nachhaltigen angelfischereilichen Nutzung von Gewässern. Wien.
   Google Scholar
• Venables WN, Ripley BD. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. 4th ed. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcoxon F. 1945. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin. 1(6):80–83. doi: 10.2307/3001968.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao T, Grenouillet G, Pool T, Tudesque L, Cucherousset J. 2016. Environmental determinants of fish community structure in gravel pit lakes. Ecol Freshw Fish. 25(3):412–421. doi: 10.1111/eff.12222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar