A comparison of boat cleaning systems: invasive species removal, boater outreach and engagement, and cost

References

• Anderson LG, Dunn AM, Rosewarne PJ, Stebbing PD. 2015. Invaders in hot water: a simple decontamination method to prevent the accidental spread of aquatic invasive non-native species. Biol Invasions. 17(8):2287–2297. doi: 10.1007/s10530-015-0875-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson LG, White PCL, Stebbing PD, Stentiford GD, Dunn AM. 2014. Biosecurity and vector behaviour: evaluating the potential threat posed by anglers and canoeists as pathways for the spread of invasive non-native species and pathogens. PLoS One. 9(4):e92788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armson R. 2004. Oregon 2003 Aquatic nuisance species and boating survey: results and technical report. Minnesota Center for Survey Research. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/205632
   Google Scholar
• Barnes MA, Jerde CL, Keller D, Chadderton WL, Howeth JG, Lodge DM. 2013. Viability of aquatic plant fragments following desiccation. Invasive Plant Sci Manag. 6(2):320–325. doi: 10.1614/IPSM-D-12-00060.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer J, Moy P, De Stasio B. 2011. Acute upper thermal limits of three aquatic invasive invertebrates: hot water treatment to prevent upstream transport of invasive species. Environ Manage. 47(1):67–76. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9573-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbeer SJ, Renals T, Quinn C, Warren DA, Pile B, Hills K, Dunn AM. 2021. The effectiveness of hot water pressurized spray in field conditions to slow the spread of invasive alien species. MBI. 12(1):125–147. doi: 10.3391/mbi.2021.12.1.09.
   Google Scholar
• Branstrator DK, Shannon LJ, Brown ME, Kitson MT. 2013. Effects of chemical and physical conditions on hatching success of Bythotrephes longimanus. Limnol Oceanogr. 58(6):2171–2184. doi: 10.4319/lo.2013.58.6.2171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruckerhoff L,Havel J,Knight S. 2014. Survival of invasive aquatic plants after air exposure and implications for dispersal by recreational boats. Hydrobiologia 746(1):113–121. doi: 10.1007/s10750-014-1947-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan K, LaMoreaux A, O’Brien T. 2017. Options for preventing the spread of aquatic invasive species with the aid of boat cleaning and wash stations in New Hampshire. New Hampshire Lakes Association, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Watershed Management Bureau: Concord (NH).
   Google Scholar
• Campbell T, Bodde M, Seilheimer T. 2020. Effectiveness of a CD3 System at removing macrophytes and small-bodied invertebrates from watercraft. University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute. https://www.seagrant.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/CD3-Report-FINAL-7.6.2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Campbell T, Verboomen T, Montz G, Seilheimer T. 2016. Volume and contents of residual water in recreational water ballast systems. Mbi. 7(3):281–286. doi: 10.3391/mbi.2016.7.3.07.
   Google Scholar
• CD3 Systems 2023. Why CD3?; [cited 27 July 2023]. Available from https://cd3systems.com/WHY-CD3/
   Google Scholar
• Cimino SA, Strecker AL. 2018. Boater knowledge and behavior regarding aquatic invasive species at a boat wash station. Northwest Sci. 92(3):224–233. doi: 10.3955/046.092.0308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comeau S, Rainville S, Baldwin W, Austin E, Gerstenberger S, Cross C, Wong WH. 2011. Susceptibility of quagga mussels (Dreissena rostriformis bugensis) to hot-water sprays as a means of watercraft decontamination. Biofouling. 27(3):267–274. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2011.564275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly NA, Lauber TB, Stedman RC. 2014. Reducing the spread of aquatic invasive species and fish pathogens in the Great Lakes: the role of anglers. Human Dimensions Research Unit series No 14-7. Cornell University: Ithaca (NY). https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/40358/HDRUReport14-07.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Coughlan NE, Armstrong F, Baker-Arney C, Crane K, Cuthbert RN, Jansen MAK, Kregting L, Vong GYW, Dick JTA. 2021. Retention of viability by fragmented invasive Crassula helmsii, Elodea Canadensis and Lagarosiphon major. River Res Apps. 38(8):1356–1361. doi: 10.1002/rra.3952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane K, Cuthbert RN, Dick JTA, Kregting L, MacIsaac HJ, Coughlan NE. 2019. Full steam ahead: direct steam exposure to inhibit spread of invasive aquatic macrophytes. Biol Invasions. 21(4):1311–1321. doi: 10.1007/s10530-018-1901-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Stasio BT, Acy CB, Frankel KE, Fritz GM, Lawhun SD. 2019. Tests of disinfection methods for invasive snails and zooplankton: effects of treatment methods and contaminated materials. Lake Reserv Manage. 35(2):156–166. doi: doi: 10.1080/10402381.2019.1599086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doll A. 2018. Occurrence and survival of zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) veliger larvae in residual water transported by recreational watercraft. Master’s Thesis. University of Minnesota: Minneapolis-Saint Paul (MN).
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly K. 2018. National invasive species recreational pathways survey – results and report. Beyond Attitude Consulting. Canadian Council on Invasive Species. https://canadainvasives.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/2018-07_National-Invasive-Species-Recreational-Pathways-Survey_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Evans CA, Kelting DL, Forrest KM, Steblen LE. 2011. Fragment viability and rootlet formation in Eurasian watermilfoil after desiccation. J Aquat Plant Manage. 49:57–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin Consulting 2020. Lake public access observations for aquatic invasive species prevention behaviors. Hennepin County Environment and Energy. https://www.hennepin.us/-/media/hennepinus/business/work-with-hennepin-county/docs-a-l/Henn_County_Access_Observations_April_2020_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller E, Hamilton M, Kirkwood J. 2016. Protecting Michigan’s inland lakes: a toolkit for local governments. Van Buren Conservation District: Paw Paw (MI). https://mymlsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Protecting-Your-Inland-Lakes-A-Toolkit-for-Local-Governments-Part-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hammond E, Ozdemir AO, Shropshire A, Mase A, Pratsch S, Newenhouse A, Shaw B, Campbell T. 2019. Aquatic invasive species prevention: Wisconsin boaters and anglers survey report. University of Wisconsin-Madison Division of Extension, Natural Resources Institute. https://publications.aqua.wisc.edu/product-category/aquatic-invasive-species/.
   Google Scholar
• Henker KB, Brown G. 2011. As good as the real thing? A comparative study of interpretive podcasts and traditional ranger talks. J Interpret Res.16(1):7–23. doi: 10.1177/109258721101600102.
   Google Scholar
• Howell AP, Shaw BR, Alvarez G. 2015. Bait shop owners as opinion leaders: a test of the theory of planned behavior to predict pro-environmental outreach behaviors and intentions. Environ Behav. 47(10):1107–1126. doi: 10.1177/0013916514539684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe-Nelson N, van Riper CJ, Golebie E, Johnson DN, Eriksson M, Suski C, Stedman R, Hunt LM. 2022. Angler preferences for management of aquatic invasive species in the USA and Canada: a discrete choice experiment. J Great Lakes Res. 49(2):545–553. doi: 10.1016/j.jglr.2022.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson LE, Ricciardi A, Carlton JT. 2001. Overland dispersal of aquatic invasive species: a risk assessment of transient recreational boating. Ecol Appl 11(6):1789–1799. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1789:ODOAIS]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappel M. 2012. Dreissena rostiformis bugensis: desiccation of adult quagga mussels found in Lake Mead as a preventive measure against overland dispersal in the Western United States. Master’s Thesis. University of Nevada: Las Vegas (NV).
   Google Scholar
• Kelly NE, Wantola K, Weisz E, Yan ND. 2013. Recreational boats as a vector of secondary spread for aquatic invasive species and native crustacean zooplankton. Biol Invasions. 15(3):509–519. doi: 10.1007/s10530-012-0303-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle F, Linford Q, Pilgreen D, Le T, Woodward R. 2022. Evaluation of the effectiveness of western states’ aquatic invasive species public awareness campaigns for eliciting desired prevention behaviors. College Station (TX): Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension. Texas A&M University.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell SJ, Stone SF, Fernandez L. 2006. The economic impacts of aquatic invasive species: a review of the literature. Agric Resour Econ Rev. 35(1):195–208. doi: 10.1017/S1068280500010157.
   Google Scholar
• [MDEQ/EGLE] Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 2018. Aquatic invasive species mobile boat wash wastewater guidance document. Lansing (MI). https://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/wrd-ais-boat-wash-guidance_592130_7.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• [NREPA] Michigan’s Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act 1994. Act 451 of Part 413: Transgenic and Nonnative Organisms. Lansing (MI): https://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(dol44qjsrrieya45sgjptg45))/documents/mcl/pdf/mcl-451-1994-III-2-1-WILDLIFE-CONSERVATION-413.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mohit S, Johnson TB, Arnott SE. 2021. Recreational watercraft decontamination: can current recommendations reduce aquatic invasive species spread? MBI. 12(1):148–164. doi: 10.3391/mbi.2021.12.1.10.
   Google Scholar
• Morse JT. 2009. Assessing the effects of application time and temperature on the efficacy of hot-water sprays to mitigate fouling by Dreissena polymorpha (zebra mussels Pallas). Biofouling 25(7):605–610. doi: 10.1080/08927010902989245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan LR, Jerde CL, McVeigh M, Mahon AR. 2014. An assessment of angler education and bait trade regulations to prevent invasive species introduction in the Laurentian Great Lakes. MBI. 5(4):319–326. doi: 10.3391/mbi.2014.5.4.02.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe DM, Lee J, Han J, Oh C. 2016. Informing the debate: improving public outreach and education programs to minimize the spread of aquatic invasive species. The Institute for Public Policy and Social Research, Michigan State University, MI. http://www.ippsr.msu.edu/sites/default/files/MAPPR/ImprovingEducationOkeefe.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Otts S, Nanjappa P. 2016. Model regulation for state watercraft inspection and decontamination programs. National Sea Grant Law Center NSGLC-16-05-05: University (MS).
   Google Scholar
• Poudel S, Nyaupane GP. 2013. The role of interpretative tour guiding in sustainable destination management: a comparison between guided and nonguided tourists. J Travel Res. 52(5):659–672. doi: 10.1177/0047287513478496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhananga A, Davenport MA, Seekamp E, Bundy D. 2015. Preventing the spread of aquatic invasive species: boater concerns, habits, and future behaviors. Hum Dimens Wildl. 20(5):381–393. doi: 10.1080/10871209.2015.1030479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinbeck G, Lach D, Chan S. 2011. Exploring stakeholders’ attitudes and beliefs regarding behaviors that prevent the spread of invasive species. Environ Educ Res. 17(3):341–352. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2010.542451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior M. 2005. News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American J Political Sci. 49(3):577–592. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00143.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Rey M,Consuegra S,Börger L,Garcia De Leaniz C. 2021. Boat ramps facilitate the dispersal of the highly invasive zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). Biol Invasions. 23(5):1487–1496. doi: 10.1007/s10530-020-02453-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothlisberger JD, Chadderton WL, McNulty J, Lodge DM. 2010. Aquatic invasive species transport via trailered boats: what is being moved, who is moving it, and what can be done. Fisheries 35(3):121–132. doi: 10.1577/1548-8446-35.3.121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz GM, Carlton JT. 2003. Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. P. 459–504. Island Press: Washington (DC).
   Google Scholar
• Seekamp E, McCreary A, Mayer J, Zack S, Charlebois P, Pasternak L. 2016. Exploring the efficacy of an aquatic invasive species prevention campaign among water recreationists. Biol Invasions. 18(6):1745–1758. doi: 10.1007/s10530-016-1117-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp RL, Cleckner LB, DePillo S. 2017. The impact of on-site educational outreach on recreational users’ perceptions of aquatic invasive species and their management. Environ Educ Res. 23(8):1200–1210. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2016.1174983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw B, Campbell T, Radler BT. 2021. Testing emphasis message frames and metaphors on social media to engage boaters to learn about preventing the spread of zebra mussels. Environ Manage. 68(6):824–834. doi: 10.1007/s00267-021-01506-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• States Organization for Boating Access 2015. Construction and integration of aquatic invasive species (AIS) prevention areas at recreational boating facilities. http://www.sobaus.org/pdf/AIS-Best-Management-Practices-FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stebbing P, Rimmer G. 2014. Pressure washer use in the control of aquatic invasive non-native species. Cefas Wymouth Laboratory: Dorset (UK). http://sciencesearch.defra.gov.uk/Document.aspx?Document=12161_Pressurewasheruseinthecontrolofaquaticinvasivenon-nativespecies.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Three Rivers Park District 2018. Use and satisfaction of CD3 watercraft cleaning stations. Plymouth (MN): Research Report #5000.13. https://www.wildlifeforever.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/CD3-2018-Three-Rivers-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker A, Eddy Z, Hamilton D, De Buysser E, Chadderton L. 2017. Assessment of watercraft inspection and decontamination legislative provisions for the management of the trailered boat invasion pathway in the U.S. Great Lakes States. The Nature Conservancy; [cited 6 Feb 2023]. Available from https://www.blueaccounting.org/link/assessment-watercraft-inspection-and-decontamination-legislative-provisions-management
   Google Scholar
• Witzling L, Shaw B, Seiler D. 2016. Segmenting boaters based on level of transience: outreach and policy implications for the prevention of aquatic invasive species. Biol Invasions. 18(12):3635–3646. doi: 10.1007/s10530-016-1254-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlin C. 2014. Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. Assoc Comp Mach Inter Conf Proceed Series 18:1–10. doi: 10.1145/2601248.2601268.
   Google Scholar
• Zook B, Phillips S. 2012. Uniform minimum protocols and standards for watercraft interception programs for dreissenid mussels in the western United States: January 2012 version. Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission: Portland (OR).
   Google Scholar