Training for Telecommunications

References

• Alessi, S. M. (1988). Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 15(2), 40–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, G., & Thompson, A. (1994). Analysis of the effect of networking on computer-assisted collaborative writing in a fifth-grade classroom. (ERIC ED 373 777)
   Google Scholar
• Atherton, J., & Buriak, P. (1988). Video simulation as a computer applications instructional technique for professionals and students. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 13(3), 59–71.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, J. A. (1994). Multiethnic education : Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, A. E., & Ivers, K. (1996). The Internet and instruction: Activities and ideas. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bracey, G. (1990). Education still not looking at the big picture. Electronic Learning, 9(8), 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M., & Riel, M. (1989). The effect of distant audiences on students’ writing. American Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 143–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillion, C. L., & Kincade, K. M. (1990). Interaction, technology, and the adult basic education student. Adult Literacy and Basic Education, 14(3), 184–197.
   Google Scholar
• Dupagne, M., & Krendl, KA. (1992). Teachers’ attitudes toward computers: A review of the literature. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(3), 420–429.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, K. (1989). Technology training for teachers: A federal perspective. Educational Technology, 29(3), 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, A. D., & Carrier, C. A. (1989). Teacher education and computer training: An assessment. Peabody Journal of Education, 64(1), 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Gorrell, J. (1992). Outcomes of using computer simulations. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(3), 359–366.
   Google Scholar
• Handler, M. G. (1993). Preparing new teachers to use computer technology: Perceptions and suggestions for teacher educators. Computer Education, 20(2), 147–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinzer, C. K., Sherwood, R. D., & Loofbourrow, M. C. (1989). Simulation software vs. expository text: A comparison of retention across two instructional tools. Reading Research and Instruction, 28(2), 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Knupfer, N. N. (1990). Teachers’ psychological types and their uses of educational computing: Addressing teachers’ needs. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 7(1), 13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Knupfer, N. N. (1989-1990). The teacher as a critical component of computer education and school change. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 6(2), 16–29.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. (1976). Corporate video: A report on how it helps Holiday Inn, J & L Steel, and Texas Instruments. Training, 13(10), 54–56.
   Google Scholar
• Mackowiak, K. (1991). The effects of faculty characteristics on computer applications in instruction. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(3), 396–410.
   Google Scholar
• Milheim, W. D., & Martin, B. L. (1991). Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: Three different perspectives. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18(3), 99–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1987). University distance education of adults. TechTrends, 32(4), 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Munday, R., Windham, R., & Stamper, J. (1991). Technology for learning: Are teachers being prepared? Educational Technology, 31(3), 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Newby, T. (1989). Increasing intrinsic motivation change within organizations. Performance & Instruction, 28(6), 36–41.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection (OTA-EHR-616). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, L. J. (1984, Summer). W.C.U. MicroNet: A state network for linking secondary science and math classrooms. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, C. M., & Schwartz, E. (1989). An instructional theory for the design of computer-based simulations. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16(1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruben, B. D., & Lederman, L. C. (1982). Instructional simulation gaming: Validity, reliability, and utility. Simulation & Games, 13(2), 233–244.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, G. (1991). Learning: New conceptions, new opportunities. Educational Technology, 31(6), 41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Sivin-Kachala, J. P., & Bialo, E. R. (1993). The effectiveness of technology in schools 1990-1992. Washington, DC: Software Publishers Association.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., & Hooper, E. (1991). Simulations: An opportunity we are missing. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(4), 497–513.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, J., Carnine, D., & Gersten, R. (1988). Teaching problem solving through computer simulations. American Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 72–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, W. (1993). Perception principles. In M. Fleming, & W. H. Levie (Eds.), Instructional message design (2nd ed.) (pp. 55–126). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, W. (1991). International group work: Using a computer conference to invigorate the writing of your students. In W. Wresch (Ed.), The English classroom in the computer age (pp. 100–103). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar