Using Sociocultural Theory to Guide Teacher Use and Integration of Instructional Technology in Two Professional Development Schools

References

• Bonk, C., Ehman, L., Hixon, E., & Yamagata-Lynch, L. (2002). The Pedagogical TICKIT: Web conferencing to promote communication and support during teacher development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 205–233.
   Google Scholar
• Brett, Woodruff & Nason (2002). Communities of inquiry among preservice teachers investigating mathematics. THEMES in Education, 3(1), 39–62.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., & Armstrong, S. (Eds.) (2002). Edutopia: Success stories for learning in the digital age. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, E, & McGrath, D. (2003). Moments of joy: Student engagement and conceptual learning in the design of hypermedia documents. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 402–422.
   Google Scholar
• Chiero, R., Sherry, L., Bohlin, R., & Harris, S. (2003). Creating learning communities to foster technology integration in student teaching experiences. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2003(1), 3805–3812.
   Google Scholar
• Cradler, J., McNabb, M., Freeman, M., & Burchett, R. (2002). How does technology influence student learning? Learning and Leading with Technology, 29(8), 47–49.
   Google Scholar
• Crocco, M. S., Faithfull, B., & Schwartz, S. (2003). Inquiring minds want to know: Action research at a New York City professional development school. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Knsultit Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engestrom, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspective on activity and context (pp. 64–103). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engestrom, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamaki, R. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopson, M. H., Simms, R. L., & Knezek, G. (2002). Using a technology-enriched environment to improve higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), 109–120.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. E., & Ooms, A. (2004). Content-focused technology inquiry groups: Preparing urban teachers to integrate technology to transform student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(4), 397–411.
   Google Scholar
• Kahne, J., & Westheimer, J. (2000). A pedagogy of collective action and reflection: Preparing teachers for collective school leadership. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(5), 372–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, J., Ehman, L., & Bonk, C. (2003). Professional development that increases technology integration by K—12 teachers: Influence of the TICKIT program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2002). Impact of new information technologies on teachers and students. Education and Information Technologies, 7(4), 369–376.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, B. B., & Rock, T. C. (2003). The effects of collaborative action research on preservice and experienced teacher partners in professional development schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(2), 135–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, S., Waddoups, G., Levin, J., & Buell, J. (2001). Highly interactive and effective online learning environments for teacher professional development. International Journal of Educational Technology, 2(2). Retrieved March 7, 2005 from http://smi.curtin.edu.au/ijet/v2n2/slevin/.
   Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. J., Hamilton, M. L., LaBoskey, V. K., & Russell, T. L. (Eds.) (2004). International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Milken Exchange on Educational Technology. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education. Santa Monica, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, L. C. (Ed.) (1990). Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. New York: Cambirdge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, L. C., & Greenberg, J. B. (1990). Creating zones of possibilities: combining social contexts. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 319–348). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mouza, C. (2003). Learning to teach with new technology: Implications on professional development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(2), 272–289.
   Google Scholar
• O’Bannon, B., & Judge, S. (2005). Implementing partnerships across the curriculum with technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(2), 197–206.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R.T. & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschman (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249–268). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schacter, J. (1999). The impact of education technology on student achievement: What the most current research has to say. Milken Exchange on Education Technology. Retrieved March 7, 2005 from http://www.mff.crg/pubs/ME161.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning and schooling in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). Teachers’ tools for the 21^st century. A report on teachers’ use of technology. Washington, DC: Author. Available: http://nces.ed.gov/spider/webspider/2000102.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whipp, J. (2003). Scaffolding critical reflection in online discussions: Helping prospective teachers think deeply about field experiences in urban schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 321–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar