16
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

ETIPS

Using Cases with Virtual Schools to Prepare for, Extend, and Deepen Preservice Teachers' Field Experiences

, EdD, & , PhD
Pages 77-84 | Published online: 04 Mar 2014

References

  • Beyerbach, B., Walsh, C., & Vanatta, R. (2001). From teaching technology to using technology to enhance student learning: Preservice teachers’ changing perceptions of technology infusion. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 105–127.
  • Borko, H., & Mayfield, V. (1995). The roles of the cooperating teacher and university supervisor in learning to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(5), 501–518.
  • Bosch, K. A., & Cardinale, L. (1993). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of computer use during a field experience. Journal on Computing in Teacher Education, 10(1), 23–37.
  • Bunting, C., (1988). Cooperating teachers and the changing views of teacher candidates. Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 42–46.
  • CEO Forum on Education and Technology. (1999). Professional development: A link to better learning. Retrieved January 12, 2005, from http://www.ceoforum.org/reports.cfm?RID=2
  • CEO Forum on Education and Technology. (2000). Teacher Preparation STaR Chart: A self-assessment tool for colleges of education. Retrieved January 12, 2005, from http://www.ceoforum.org/reports.cfm?RID=3
  • Clark, C. M., & Yinger, R. J. (1977). Research on teacher thinking. Curriculum Inquiry, 7(4), 279–304.
  • Dexter, S., & Riedel, E. (2003). Why improving preservice teacher educational technology preparation must go beyond the college’s walls. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 334–346.
  • Dexter, S. (2002). ETIPS: Educational technology integration and implementation principles. In P. Rodgers (Ed.), Designing instruction for technology-enhanced learning (pp. 56–70). New York: Idea Group Publishing.
  • Elksnin, L. K. (1998). Use of the case method of instruction in special education teacher preparation programs: A preliminary investigation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 21, 95–108.
  • Elksnin, L. K. (2001). Implementing the case method of instruction in special education teacher preparation programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 24(2), 95–107.
  • Griffin, G. A. (1986). Issues in student teaching: A review. In J. D. Raths & L. G. Katz (Eds.), Advances in teacher education (Vol. 2., pp. 239–273). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Grove, K., Strudler, N., & Odell, S. (2004). Mentoring towards technology use: Cooperating teacher practice in supporting teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 85–109.
  • Guyton, E., & McIntyre, D. J. (1990). Student teaching and school experiences. In J. Skiula (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 329–348). New York: Macmillan.
  • International Society for Technology in Education [ISTE]. (2000). National educational technology standards for teachers. Eugene, OR: Author.
  • Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium [IN-TASC]. (1992). Model standards for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue [Online]. Available: http://www.ccsso.org/intascst.html
  • Knezek, G. A., Christensen, R. W., Miyashita, K. T., & Ropp, M. M. (2000). Instruments for assessing educator progress in technology integration. Denton, TX: Institute for the Integration of Technology into Teaching and Learning. Retrieved January 13, 2003 from http://www.iittl.unt.edu/pt3II/bookl.htm
  • Lacey, C. A., & Merseth, K. K. (1993). Cases, hypermedia and computer networks: Three curricular innovations for teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(6), 543–551.
  • Lipham, J. M. (1974). Making effective decisions. In J. A. Culbertson, C. Henson, & Morine-Deshimer, G. (Eds. 1978-1979). Planning and classroom reality: An in-depth look. Educational Research Quarterly, 3(4), 83–99.
  • Manouchehri, A., & Enderson, M. C. (2003). The utility of case study methodology in mathematics teacher preparation. Teacher Education Quarterly, 30(1), 203–218.
  • Marzano, R. J. (1992). A different kind of classroom: Teaching with dimensions of learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD
  • Masingila, J. O., & Doerr, H. M. (2002, September). Understanding preservice teachers’ emerging practices through their analyses of a multimedia case study of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(3), 235–263.
  • McIntyre, D. J., Byrd, D. M., & Foxx, S. M. (1996). Field and laboratory experiences. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.) (pp. 171–193). New York: Simon Schuster Macmillan.
  • Merseth, K. K., & Lacey, C. A. (1993). Weaving stronger fabric: The pedagogical promise of hypermedia and case methods in teacher education. Teacher & Teacher Education, 5(3), 283–299.
  • Moursund, D., & Bielefeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange.
  • National Council for Accreaditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). (2001). Technology and Teacher Education. Retrieved October 22, 2007 from http://www.ncate.org/boe/techCurrent.asp?ch=113
  • Norton, P., & Sprague, D. (2002). Timber lane technology tales: A design experiment in alternative field experiences for preservice candidates. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 19(2), 41–60.
  • Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. (OTA-EHR-616) Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Osunde, E. O. (1996). The effect on student teachers of the teaching behaviors of cooperating teachers. Education, 116(4), 612–618.
  • Putnam, R. & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
  • Richardson-Koehler, V. (1988). Barriers to effective supervision of student teaching: A field study. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 28–34.
  • Riedel, E., & Scharber C. (2003). Assessment in a Context of Network-Based Practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
  • Riedel, E., Dexter, S., Scharber, C., & Doering, A. (2006). Experimental evidence on the effectiveness of automated essay scoring in teacher education cases. Journal of Research on Educational Computing, 35, 267–287.
  • Riedel, E., Scharber, C., & Dexter, S. (2004). Online simulations as a strategy for instruction on technology integration. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego, CA.
  • Ropp, M. M. (1999). Exploring individual characteristics associated with learning to use computers in preservice teacher preparation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 402–424.
  • Shavelson, R. J., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51, 455–498.
  • Strudler, N. B., & Grove, K. J. (2002). Integrating technology into teacher candidates’ field experiences. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 19(2), 33–39.
  • Walsh, J., Hagler, R., & Fowler, R. (2003). Technology integration using clinical experiences in the preparation of preservice teachers. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 19(4), 119–124.
  • Wetzel, K., Zambo, R., & Padgett, H. (2001). A picture of change in technology-rich K—8 classrooms. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(1), 5–11.
  • Wetzel, K., Zambo, R., & Buss, R. (2000). Professional development for transformative teaching with technology in K-8. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 16(2), 15–20.
  • Zeichner, K. M., & Gore, J. N. (1990). Teacher socialization. In Skiula, J. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, (pp. 329–348). New York: Macmillan.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.