Online Jigsaw Science Inquiry for Preservice Teachers

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. (2002). An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. Retrieved 17 April, 2007, from http://it.coe.uga.edu/it-forum/paper63/paper63.htm
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2).
   Google Scholar
• Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephin, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. M. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. D. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25–55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M., & Squire, K. (2001). Constructing virtual worlds: Tracing the historical development of learner practices. Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), 47–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, C., Chin, K. L., & Chang, V. (2000, July 3-5). Web-based learning: Aspects of cultural differences. Paper presented at the 8th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Boston, C. (2002). The concept of formative assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(9). Retrieved 24 June, 2005, from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asprv=8&n=9
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded Edition). Washington, DC: National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Brickhouse, N. (2005). What is inquiry? To whom should it be authentic? Paper presented at the NSF Inquiry Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., & Campione, J. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 188–228). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A. F., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Cheaney, J., & Ingebritsen, T. S. (2005). Problem-based learning in an online course: A case study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6(3) 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher 19, 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2004). Enabling distributed learning communities via emerging technologies—part one. Technological Horizons in Education (THE.) from http://www.thejournal.com/articles/16909
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938/1963). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Etkina, E. (2002). Formative and summative assessment in a physics class: Time to change. Proceedings of the 2002 PER Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Fassoulopoulos, G., Kariotoglou, P., & Koumaras, P. (2003). Consistent and inconsistent pupils’ reasoning about intensive quantities: The case of density and pressure. Research in Science Education, 33, 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forinash, K., & Wisman, R. (2001, September). The viability of distance education science laboratories. Retrieved 21 February, 2007, from http://www.thejournal.com/articles/15590
   Google Scholar
• Fottland, H. (2002). Creating a community of learners online and offline in teacher education. Retrieved 22 August, 2006, from http://www.ncolr.org/journal/current/fottland/1.html
   Google Scholar
• Guribye, F., & Wasson, B. (2002, January 7-11). The ethnography of distributed collaborative learning. Paper presented at the CSCL (Computer Support for Collaborative Learning), Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, D. T., & Zuiker, S. J. (2003). A new perspective for evaluating innovative science learning environments. Science Education, 87(4), 539–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz, P. (2002, May). Instructivism: Between CAI and microworlds. Paper presented at the EU/US Sintra, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Instructional Technology Council. (2006). ITC second annual survey on distance education. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., & Kwon, H. I. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 35–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, S. I., Barrett, M. S., & Jones, T. A. (2003). Defining learning communities. Paper presented at the The Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE), New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, T. K., Jackson, D. F., Yarger, D. N., & Boysen, P. J. (2000). Principles for the design and use of simulations in science learning as exemplified by a prototype microworld. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 19(3), 237–252.
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T. (2003). CSCL, argumentation, and Deweyan inquiry. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 259–265). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T. D., Kelson, A. C., Feltovich, P. J., & Barrows, H. S. (1996). Computer-supported problem-based learning: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. In T. D. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 83–124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Libarkin, J. C., Crockett, C. D., & Sadler, P. M. (2003). Density on dry land. The Science Teacher, 46–50.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, L. C., & Redish, E. F. (1999). RL-PER1: Resource letter on physics education research. American Journal of Physics, 67(9), 755–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. G. (1989). Three modes of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, (3)2, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, J. L. (2003). Conceptual integration in online interdisciplinary study: Current perspective, theories, and implications for future research. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2).
   Google Scholar
• Muithead, B., & Juwah, C. (2004). Interactivity in computer-mediated college and university education: A recent review of the literature. Educational Technology & Society, 7(1), 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, G. M., Patterson, E. T., Gavrin, A. D., & Christian, W. (1999). Just-in-time teaching: Blending active learning with Web technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, M. C., Godfrey, L., & Moses, R. P. (1998). The missing data point: Negotiating purposes in classroom mathematics and science. In J. G. Greeno & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning (pp. 89–125): LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, T. M., & Wisher, R. A. (2002). The effectiveness of Web-based instruction: An initial inquiry. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(2).
   Google Scholar
• Otero, V. (2001). Conceptual development and context: How do they relate? Proceedings of the 2002 PER Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117–175.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1998). The origin of intelligence in the child (M. Cook, Trans.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Puntambekar, S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2005). Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 185–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1(4), Fall 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Rovai, A. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1).
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. In D. Pearson & A. Iran-Nehad (Eds.), Review of Research in Education, 23, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R. C. (2002). Every curriculum tells a story. Retrieved 1 January 2005, from http://west.cmu.edu/masters/overview/learningByDoing/SCC%20white%20paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R. C., Fano, A., Bell, B., & Jona, M. (1993/1994). The design of goal-based scenarios. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(4), 305–345.
   Google Scholar
• Shachar, M., & Neumann, Y. (2003). Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: A meta-analytic approach. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2).
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. W., & Resnick, M. (1999). “Thick" authenticity: New media and authentic learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 10(2), 195–215.
   Google Scholar
• Sikora, A. C. (2003). A profile of participation in distance education: 1999-2000. Education Statistics Quarterly, 4(4). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/Vol_4/4_4/q4_3.asp
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C., Maclin, D., Grosslight, L., & Davis, H. (1997). Teaching for understanding: A study of students’ preinstruction theories of matter and a comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching about matter and density. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 317–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., Snir, J., & Grosslight, L. (1992). Using conceptual models to facilitate conceptual change: The case of weight-density differentiation. Cognition and Instruction, 9(3), 221–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, T. D., Tan, A. G., & Hoffman, C. M. (2006). Digest of Education Statistics 2005 (No. NCES 2006-030). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).
   Google Scholar
• Steinkuehler, C. A., Derry, S. J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Delmarcelle, M. (2002). Cracking the resource nut with distributed problem-based learning in secondary teacher education. Distance Education, 23(1), 23–39.
   Google Scholar
• Stodel, E. J., Thompson, T. L., & MacDonald, C. J. (2006). Learners’ perspectives on what is missing from online learning: Interpretations through the community of inquiry framework. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 7(3).
   Google Scholar
• Torp, L., & Sage, S. (1998). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K—12 education. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. D. (1997). Interactivity: From agents to outcomes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 71, 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Waltonen-Moore, S., Stuart, D., Newton, E., Oswald, R., & Varonis, E. (2006). From virtual strangers to a cohesive online learning community: The evolution of online group development in a professional development course. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(2), 287–311.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. G., Ludwig-Hardman, S., Thornam, C. L., & Dunlap, J. C. (2004). Bounded community: Designing and facilitating learning communities in formal courses. International Revieu of Research in Open and Distance, 5(3).
   Google Scholar
• Woods, R. H., & Baker, J. D. (2004). Interaction and immediacy in online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5(2).
   Google Scholar
• Yacci, M. (2000). Interactivity demystified: A structural definition for distance education and intelligent computer-based instruction. Educational Technology, 40(4), 5–16.
   Google Scholar