Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions of Instant Messaging in Two Educational Contexts

References

• Abram, S. (2004). Twenty reasons to love IM. Information Outlook, 8(10), 40–42.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, J. (2006). Students perceptions of the impact of instant messaging on academic writing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67(2), (AAT 3207831).
   Google Scholar
• Beach, R., & Lundell, D. (1998). Early adolescents’ use of computermediated communication in writing and reading. In D. Keinking, M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, & R. D. Kieffer (Eds.). Handbook of literacy and technology (pp. 93–112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chester, A., & Gwynne, G. (1998). Online Teaching: Encouraging Collaboration through Anonymity. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4(2). Retrieved February 1, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vo14/issue2/chester.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.). Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp 1–46). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, D. H., Kelly, D. M., & Pomerantz, S. (2006). “The geeks shall inherit the earth": Girls’ agency, subjectivity and empowerment. Journal of Youth Studies, 9(4), 419–437.
   Google Scholar
• Dos Santos, B. L., & Wright, A. L. (2001). Internet-supported management education. Information Services & Use, 21, 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, R. (November/December 2005). Instant messaging: IM online! RU? Educause Review, 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Garthwait, A. (2007). Middle school hypermedia composition: A qualitative case study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(4), 357–375.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grinter, R., & Palen, L. (2002). Instant Messaging in teen life. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, H., Chang, K., Sung, Y. (2007). An analysis of peer assessment online discussions within a course that uses project-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(3), 237–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., Wood, J. F., Smith, V., & Westbrook, N. (2004). Friendships through IM: Examining The relationship between instant messaging and intimacy. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1). Retrieved February 13, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issuel/hu.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, G. E. (2006). Fast times and digital literacy: Participation roles and portfolio construction within instant messaging. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(2), 171–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, culture, and activity, 3, 149–164.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005). Teens and technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., & Fabos, B. (2005). Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(4), 470–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. & Finders, M. (2002). Implied adolescents and implied teachers: A generation gap for new times. In D. E. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp. 101–113). New York: Peter Lang Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Linehan, C. & McCarthy, J. (2001). Reviewing the “community of practice” metaphor: An analysis of control relations in a primary school classroom. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8, 129–147.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. & Lewis, C. (2007). Examining opportunities to learn literacy: The role of critical sociocultural research. In C. Lewis, P. Enciso, & E. B. Moje (Eds.), Reframing sociocultural research on literacy: Identity, agency, and power. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., & Bradner, E. (2000). Interaction and Out-eraction: Instant Messaging in Action. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, S. (2002). Socialization in the “virtual hallway”: Instant messaging in the asynchronous Web-based distance education classroom. Internet and Higher Education, 5, 363–372.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, K. (2001). Contextualization and the negotiation of social identities in a geographically distributed situated learning project. Linguistics and Education, 12, 285–308.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Repman, J., Zinskie, C., & Carlson, D. (2005). Effective use of CMC tools in interactive online learning. Computers in the Schools, 22(1/2), 57–69.
   Google Scholar
• Riel, M. & Polin, L. (2004). Online Learning Communities: Common Ground and Critical Differences in Designing Technical Environments. In S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray (Eds.), Designingfor Virtual Community in the Service of Learning (pp. 16–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, E. (2007). Students’ communicative practices around writing and digital technologies: An ethnographical study of an inner-city high school in the northeast of Brazil. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67(2), (AA13264222).
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1995). Sociocultural activity on three planes. In J. V. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shiu, E., & Lenhart, A. (2004). How Americans use Instant Messaging. Pew Internet and American Life Project report. Retrieved December 14, 2006, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Instantmessage_Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, A., Schouten, A. P., & Peter, J. (2005). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the Internet. New Media and Society, 7, 383–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L.C., & Beasley, W. (2006). Integrating instant messenger into online office hours to enhance synchronous online interaction in teacher education. International Journal of Instructional Media, 33(3), 277–287.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (1994). Case study research design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., Gao, T., Ring, G., & Zhang, W. (2007). Using online discussion forums to assist a traditional English class. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(4), 623–643.
   Google Scholar