When Curriculum and Technology Meet

References

• Abowd, G. D. (1999). Classroom 2000: An experiment with the instrumentation of a living educational environment. Pervasive Computing, 38(4), 508–530.
   Google Scholar
• Abowd, G. D., Harvel, L. D., & Brotherton, J. A. (2000). Building a digital library of captured educational experiences. Paper presented at the Kyoto International Conference on Digital Libraries, Kyoto, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Blichfeldt, B. S. (2006). Creating a wider audience for action research: Learning from case-study research. Journal of Research Practice, 2(1), Article D2.
   Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2002). Oversold and underused. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Du, H. S., & Wagner, C. (2005, January 3-6, 2005). Learning with weblogs: an empirical investigation. Paper presented at the 38th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: What we’ve learned. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 4–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glogoff, S. (2005). Instructional blogging: Promoting interactivity, student-centered learning, and peer input. Innovate, 1(5).
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2007, April). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge: curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Technology in Education. (2004a). National educational technology standards for students. Retrieved March 28, 2005, from http://cnets.iste.org/students/s_stands.html
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Technology in Education. (2004b). National educational technology standards for teachers. Retrieved March 28, 2005, from http://cnets.iste.org/teachers/t_stands.html
   Google Scholar
• International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). National educational technology standards for students, refreshed. Retrieved September 6, 2007, from http://www.iste.org/inhouse/nets/cnets/students/pdf/NETS_for_Students_2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kajder, S. B. (2007). Bringing new literacies into the content area literacy methods course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(2).
   Google Scholar
• Keeler, C. G. (in press). Modeling technology-based social studies instruction: A simulated WebQuest. In E. Heilman, R. Fruja & M. Missias (Eds.), Social Studies and Diversity Teacher Education: What We Do and Why We Do It.
   Google Scholar
• Koszalka, T., & Bianco, M. B. (2001). Reflecting on the instructional design of distance education for teachers: Learnings from the instructors. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2(1), 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Molebash, P. (2004a). Outcomes of various scaffolding strategies on student teachers’ digital historical inquiries. Journal of Social Studies Research, 31(2).
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Molebash, P. (2004b). Using digital history for positive change in social studies education. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 20(4).
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2002). Action research: Principles and practice (2nd ed.). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• McTighe, J., & O’Connor, K. (2005). Seven practices for effective learning. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 10–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertler, C. A. (2006). Action research: Teachers as researchers in the classroom. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. In AACTE Committee on Innova-tion and Technology (Ed.), The Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Educators: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, M. M., Rogers, C., Sanford, B., Nocerino, M. A., MacLean, M. S., & Clawson, S. (2004). Teacher research for better schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, S. (2004). Template-based teacher web pages. Learning and Leading with Technology, 32(2), 40–43.
   Google Scholar
• National Committee on Science Education Standards Assessment, & National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Teachers of English. (1996). Standards for the English language arts. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English and International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Teachers of Mathematics (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics (1 ed.). Reston: National Council of Teachers for Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for the social studies (No. Bulletin 89). Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Bannon, B., Puckett, K., & Rakes, G. (2006). Using Technology to Support Visual Learning Strategies. Computers in the Schools, 23(1/2), 125–137.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection (Report No. OTA-EHR-616). Washington, D.C.: Office of Technology Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2004). Partnership for 21st century skills. Retrieved March 27, 2005, from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/
   Google Scholar
• Poling, C. (2005). Blog on: Building communication and collaboration among staff and students. Learning and Leading with Technology, 32(6), 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V., & Lai, M. K. (2006). Practitioner research for educators: A guide to improving classrooms and schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salpeter, J. (2005). Telling tales with technology. Technology & Learning, 25(7), 18, 20, 22, 24.
   Google Scholar
• Schmuck, R. A. (2006). Practical action research for change (2 ed.). Corwin Press: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shorr, P. W. (2004). One call at a time. Scholastic Administrator, June, 35–38.
   Google Scholar
• West, R. E., & Graham, C. (2007). Benefits and challenges of using live modeling to help preservice teachers transfer technology integration principles. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education 23(4).
   Google Scholar
• Zike, D. (1992). Big book of books and activities. San Antonio, TX: Dinah-Might Activities, Inc.
   Google Scholar