The Impact of a Federally Funded Grant on a Professional Development Program: Teachers’ Stages of Concern Toward Technology Integration

References

• Atkins, N. E., & Vasu, E. S. (2000). Measuring knowledge of technology usage and stages of concern about computing: A study of middle school teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 279–302.
   Google Scholar
• Ayersman, D. J., & Reed, M. W. (2001, February 14-17). A four-year examination of students’ stages of concern toward the campus academic computer network. Paper presented at the Eastern Educational Research Association’s annual conference in Hilton Head, SC.
   Google Scholar
• CEO Forum. (1999, February). Professional Development: A link to better learning. School Technology and Readiness Report. Retrieved October 3, 2006, from http://www.ceoforum.org/downloads/99report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, D., Hattie, J., & Ng, D. (2001). Reexamining the stages of concern questionnaire: A test of alternative models. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(4), 226–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, D., & Ng, D. (2000, Summer). Teachers’ stages of concern about the target-oriented curriculum. Education Journal, 28(I), 109–122.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galagan, P. A. (1999, May/June). Special report: Interactive distance learning. Technical Training, 2.
   Google Scholar
• George, A. A., Hall, G. E., & Stiegelbauer, S. M. (2006). Measuring Implementation in Schools: The Stages of Concern Questionnaire. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Giordano, V. A. (2007). A professional development model to promote Internet integration into P-12 teachers’ practice: A mixed methods study. Computers in the Schools, 24(3/4), 111–123.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwyn, A., Adams, A., & Clarke, S. (1997). The great God of the future: The views of current and future English teachers on the place of IT in literacy English. Education, 31(2), 54–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. E., George, A. A., & Rutherford, W. L. (1977). Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for use of the SoC questionnaire. Austin, TX: Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, the University of Texas. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 147342)
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagey, M. S. (1985). The computer: An assessment of teacher training, teacher attitudes, and computer inventory in grades K—8 in the metropolitan public schools of Nashville-Davidson County. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48(11), 2850A, (UMI No. 8802602)
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, V. (1988). An exploratory case study describing the long-term residual effect of the computer integrated instruction inservice (CI-3) project (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49(12), 3689A, (UMI No. 745557321)
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Szabo, Z. (2008, March 6). A four-year study of teachers’ attitudes toward technology integration in schools. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (pp. 3845–3852). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, R., & Overbaugh, R. C. (2008). The effects of NCLB-funded instructional technology training on teachers’ classroom practice. Virginia Society for Technology in Education Journal, 22(3), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, R., & Overbaugh, R. C. (in press). School environment and technology implementation. Computers in the Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Roblyer, M. D., & Knezek, G. (2003). New millennium research for educational technology: A call for a national research agenda. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, D. L. (2000, Spring/Summer). A paradigm shift: Technology integration for higher education in the new millennium. Educational Technology Review, 13, 19–27, 33.
   Google Scholar
• Smerdon, B., Cronen, S., Lanahan, L., Anderson, J., Iannotti, N., & Angeles, J. (2001). Teachers’ tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers’ use of technology. Education Statistics Quarterly, 2(4). Retrieved November 3, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_2/2_4/e_section5.asp
   Google Scholar
• Strudler, N. (2003). Answering the call: A response to Roblyer and Knezek. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 72–76.
   Google Scholar