Teaching Formative Assessment Strategies to Preservice Teachers

References

• Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.
   Google Scholar
• Burnaford, G., & Hobson, D. (1995). Beginning with the group: Collaboration as the cornerstone of graduate teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 17, 67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1989). Research methods in education, 3rd edition. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Confrey, J., & Makar, K. (2002). Developing secondary teachers’ statistical inquiry through immersion in high-stakes accountability data. In D. Mewborn, P. Sztajn, & D. White (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education PME-NA24 (pp. 1267–1279), 3, Athens, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Confrey, J., & Makar, K. (2005). Critiquing and improving data use from high stakes tests: Understanding variation and distribution in relation to equity using dynamic statistics software. In C. Dede, J. P. Honan, & C. Peters (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational improvement (pp. 198–226). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action: Studies of schools and students at work. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• DataInHand [Computer software]. (2004). Winston-Salem, North Carolina: Wake Forest University Information Systems Research and Development Group.
   Google Scholar
• Fueyo, V., & Koorland, M. A. (1997). Teacher as researcher: A synonym for professionalism. Journal of Teacher Education, 48, 336–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (1999). Using situated learning and multimedia to investigate higher order thinking. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8(4), 401–421.
   Google Scholar
• Hsi, S. (2000, April). Using handheld technologies to connect Web-based learning to outdoor investigations. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., & Button, K. (2000). Connecting graduate education in language arts with teaching contexts: The power of action research. English Education, 32(2), 107–126.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Anne (2006). Celebrating 20 years of research on educational assessment: Proceedings of the 2005 CRESST Conference (Technical Report No. 698). Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation & National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Conference. Retrieved on February 11, 2009, from http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports_set.htm
   Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E. B., Honey, M., & Light, D. (2006, April). A theoretical framework for data-driven decision making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved on February 11, 2009, from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb-true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED494275&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED494275
   Google Scholar
• Mandinach, E. B., Honey, M., Light, D., Heinze, C., & Nudell, H. (2005, April). Data-driven instructional decision making using technology-based tools. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Means, B., Penuel, W. R., & Quellmalz, E. (2001). Developing assessments for tomorrow’s classrooms. In W. Heinecke & L. Blasi (Eds.), Research Methods for Educational Technology. (Vol. Volume One: Methods of Evaluating Educational Technology.). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, G. (2006) Action research. A guide for the teacher researcher. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Price, J. N. (2001). Action research, pedagogy and change: The transformative potential of action research in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 43–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rock, T. C., & Levin, B. B. (2002). Collaborative action research projects: Enhancing preservice teacher development in professional development schools. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(1), 7–21.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, C. M., Minton, L., & Arline, C. (2007). Uncovering student thinking in mathematics: 25 formative assessment probes. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sax, C., & Fisher, D. (2001). Using qualitative action research to effect change: Implications for professional education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(2), 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Shields & Poftak (2002). A report card on handheld computing. Technology & Learning, February, 24–36.
   Google Scholar
• Soloway, E., Grant, W., Tinker, R., Roschelle, J., Mills, M., Resnick, M., et al. (1999). Science in the palm of their hands. Communications of the ACM, 42, 21–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. (2005) From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 04, 324–328.
   Google Scholar
• Tripp, D. (1990). Socially critical action research. Theory in Practice, 29(3), 158–166.____________________________________
   Google Scholar