Determination of Sustainable Factors in Green Supply Chain Management With the Adoption of Green Logistics in the Manufacturing Industry

References

• Agrawal, V., R. P. Mohanty, S. Agarwal, J. K. Dixit, and A. M. Agrawal. 2022. Analyzing critical success factors for sustainable green supply chain management. Environment, Development and Sustainability 25 (8):8233–58. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02396-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asha, L. N., A. Dey, N. Yodo, and L. G. Aragon. 2022. Optimization approaches for multiple conflicting objectives in sustainable green supply chain management. Sustainability 14 (19):12790. doi: 10.3390/su141912790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banihashemi, S. A., M. Khalilzadeh, J. Antucheviciene, and S. A. Edalatpanah. 2022. Identifying and prioritizing the challenges and obstacles of the green supply chain management in the construction industry using the fuzzy BWM method. Buildings 13 (1):38. doi: 10.3390/buildings13010038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, Z., J. Xu, F. Lai, and B. J. Collins. 2018. Institutional theory and environmental pressures: The moderating effect of market uncertainty on innovation and firm performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 65 (3):392–403. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2018.2794453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debnath, B., A. M. Bari, M. M. Haq, D. A. de Jesus Pacheco, and M. A. Khan. 2023. An integrated stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis and weighted aggregated sum product assessment framework for sustainable supplier selection in the healthcare supply chains. Supply Chain Analytics 1:100001. doi: 10.1016/j.sca.2022.100001.
   Google Scholar
• Elhidaoui, S., K. Benhida, S. El Fezazi, S. Kota, and A. Lamalem. 2022. Critical success factors of blockchain adoption in green supply chain management: Contribution through an interpretive structural model. Production & Manufacturing Research 10 (1):1–23. doi: 10.1080/21693277.2021.1990155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esfahbodi, A., Y. Zhang, Y. Liu, and D. Geng. 2023. The fallacy of profitable green supply chains: The role of green information systems (GIS) in attenuating the sustainability trade-offs. International Journal of Production Economics 255:108703. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Y., J. Wu, C. Ma, and X. Fu. 2023. Agency, reselling, or hybrid: Strategic channel selection in a green supply chain. Sustainability 15 (3):2016. doi: 10.3390/su15032016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, X., and P. Rani. 2022. Evaluate the barriers to blockchain technology adoption in sustainable supply chain management in the manufacturing sector using a novel Pythagorean fuzzy-CRITIC-CoCoSo approach. Operations Management Research 15 (3–4):725–42. doi: 10.1007/s12063-021-00245-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jum’a, L., M. Ikram, Z. Alkalha, and M. Alaraj. 2022. Factors affecting managers intention to adopt green supply chain management practices: Evidence from manufacturing firms in Jordan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 29 (4):5605–21. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16022-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khokhar, M., S. Zia, T. Islam, A. Sharma, W. Iqbal, and M. Irshad. 2022. Going green supply chain management during COVID-19, assessing the best supplier selection criteria: A triple bottom line (TBL) approach. Problemy Ekorozwoju 17 (1):36–51. doi: 10.35784/pe.2022.1.04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurinjimalar Ramu, M. R., M. Nathiya, and M. Manjula. 2022. Green supply chain management; with dematel MCDM analysis. Recent Trends in Management and Commerce 2 (3):8–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, H. F. 2022. IT resources and quality attributes: The impact on electronic green supply chain management implementation and performance. Technology in Society 68:101833. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., and T. Xiao. 2020. Pricing and collection rate decisions and reverse channel choice in a socially responsible supply chain with green consumers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 67 (2):483–95. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2018.2887118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, P. E., L. A. Ika, J. Matthews, and W. Fang. 2021. Large-scale transport infrastructure project performance: Generating a narrative of context and meaning. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 70 (10):3637–3652. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2021.3094511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado, M. C., V. S. Correa, M. M. de Queiroz, and G. C. Costa. 2023. Can global reporting initiative reports reveal companies green supply chain management practices? Journal of Cleaner Production 383:135554. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Falcó, J., E. Sánchez-García, L. A. Millan-Tudela, and B. Marco-Lajara. 2023. The role of green agriculture and green supply chain management in the green intellectual capital–sustainable performance relationship: A structural equation modelling analysis applied to the Spanish wine industry. Agriculture 13 (2):425. doi: 10.3390/agriculture13020425.
   Google Scholar
• Nureen, N., D. Liu, B. Ahmad, and M. Irfan. 2022. Exploring the technical and behavioural dimensions of green supply chain management: A roadmap toward environmental sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 29 (42):63444–57. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20352-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ososanmi, A. O., L. D. Ojo, O. E. Ogundimu, and A. E. Oke. 2022. Drivers of green supply chain management: A close-up study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29 (10):14705–14718. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16638-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, S. 2023. Sharing economy and sustainable supply chain perspective the role of environmental, economic and social pillars of the supply chain in customer intention and sustainable development. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 8 (1):100316. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2023.100316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, V., and T. Schoenherr. 2022. Implications of sectoral logistical capabilities for export competitiveness: A public policy perspective for interventions in the logistics sector. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 69 (6):2930–43. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2020.3024240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, K. E., and P. A. Rauschnabel. 2021. Augmented reality in manufacturing: Exploring worker’s perceptions of barriers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 70 (10):3344–3357. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2021.3093833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, M., R. Antony, and K. Tsagarakis. 2023. Green, resilient, agile, and sustainable fresh food supply chain enablers: Evidence from India. Annals of Operations Research 1–27. doi: 10.1007/s10479-023-05176-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty, S. K., and K. S. Bhat. 2022. Green supply chain management practices implementation and sustainability–A review. Materials Today: Proceedings 52:735–40.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, P. K., and S. W. Chan. 2022. The impact of electronic procurement adoption on green procurement towards sustainable supply chain performance-evidence from Malaysian ISO organizations. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 8 (2):61. doi: 10.3390/joitmc8020061.
   Google Scholar
• Soomro, B. A., N. F. Moawad, U. N. Saraih, N. A. A. Abedelwahed, and N. Shah. 2023. Going green with the green market and green innovation: Building the connection between green entrepreneurship and sustainable development. Kybernetes 53 (4):1484–504. doi: 10.1108/K-09-2022-1353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunarya, E., T. Nur, I. Rachmawati, D. Suwiryo, and M. Jamaludin. 2023. Antecedents of green supply chain collaborative innovation in tourism SMEs: Moderating the effects of socio-demographic factors. Uncertain Supply Chain Management 11 (1):161–8. doi: 10.5267/j.uscm.2022.10.011.
   Google Scholar
• Uemura Reche, A. Y., O. Canciglieri Junior, A. L. Szejka, and M. Rudek. 2022. Proposal for a preliminary model of integrated product development process oriented by green supply chain management. Sustainability 14 (4):2190. doi: 10.3390/su14042190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, X., H. Liao, B. Lev, and E. K. Zavadskas. 2021. A multiple criteria decision-making method with heterogeneous linguistic expressions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 70 (5):1857–1870. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2021.3072590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, Y., S. Zeng, H. Chen, and J. J. Shi. 2021. When does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis of the relationship between green innovation and financial performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 70 (9):3260–3270. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2021.3079098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, W., M. Liu, and Z. Xu. 2021. Evolutionary computation of the generalized hesitant fuzzy envelopment analysis and its application in the contractor selection of green building project. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 70 (10):3622–3636. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2021.3098718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, T., and G. Liu. 2022. A novel hybrid methodology to study the risk management of prefabricated building supply chains: An outlook for sustainability. Sustainability 15 (1):361. doi: 10.3390/su15010361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar