1966 and All That: James Gibson and Bottom-Down Theory

References

• Anscombe, G. E. M. (1974). Comment on Professor R. L. Gregory's paper. In S. C. Brown (Ed.), Philosophy of psychology (pp. 211–220). London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Burtt, E. A. (1954). The metaphysical foundations of modern physical science. New York, NY: Anchor Books. (Original work published 1923)
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A. (1995). Socializing affordances. Theory and Psychology, 5, 467–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costall, A. (2003). From direct perception to the primacy of action: A closer look at James Gibson's ecological approach to psychology. In G. J. Bremner, & A. M. Slater (Eds.), Theories of infant development (pp. 70–89). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A. (2011). Against representationalism: James Gibson's secret debt to E. B. Holt. In E. P. Charles (Ed.), A new look at New Realism: The psychology and philosophy of E. B. Holt (pp. 243–262). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A., & Morris, P. (2015). The “Textbook Gibson”: The assimilation of dissidence. History of Psychology, 18, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A., & Still, A. W. (1989). Gibson's theory of direct perception and the problem of cultural relativism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 19, 433–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crombie, A. C. (1964). Early concepts of the senses and mind. Scientific American, 210, 108–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357–370.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1922). Human nature and conduct: An introduction to social psychology. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Eddington, A. (1935). The nature of the physical world. London, UK: Dent.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1939). The Aryan myth. Journal of Educational Sociology, 13, 164–171.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1959). Perception as a function of stimulation. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. l, pp. 456–501). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1962). Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 69, 477–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1967). Autobiography. In E. G. Boring, & G. Linzey (Eds.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 5, pp. 127–43). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1968). The senses considered as perceptual systems. London, UK: Allen & Unwin. (Original work published 1966)
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1982). Part VI: Affordances and behavior. In E. Reed, & R. Jones (Eds.), Reasons for realism: Selected essays of James J. Gibson (pp. 410–411). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (Original work published 1975)
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (Original work published 1979)
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J., & Crooks, L. E. (1938). A theoretical analysis of automobile-driving. American Journal of Psychology, 51, 453–471.
   Google Scholar
• Gleick, J. (1992). Richard Feynman and modern physics. London, UK: Little Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. L. (1989). Dismantling reality. In H. Lawson, & L. Appignanesi (Eds.), Dismantling truth: Reality in the post-modern world (pp. 93–100). London, UK: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, R. L. (1997). Eye and brain: The psychology of seeing (5th ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, P. (1991). Seeing, representing and describing: An examination of David Marr's computational theory of minds. In J. Hyman (Ed.), Investigating psychology: Sciences of the mind after Wittgenstein (pp. 119–154). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hamlyn, D. W. (1981). Cognitive systems, “folk psychology,” and knowledge. Cognition, 10, 115–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield, G. C., & Epstein, W. (1979). The sensory core and the medieval foundations of early modern perceptual theory. ISIS, 70, 363–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James's radical empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hochberg, J. (1957). Effects of the Gestalt revolution: The Cornell symposium. Psychological Review, 64, 73–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, E. B. (1915). The Freudian wish and its place in ethics. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1965). Phenomenology and the crisis of philosophy (Q. Lavier, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, A. J. P. (1971). The homunculus fallacy. In M. Grene (Ed.), Interpretations of life and mind: Essays around the problem of reduction (pp. 65–83). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, T. R. (1970). Review of J. J. Gibson. The senses considered as perceptual systems. Mind, 79, 145–147.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1842). A review of Berkeley's theory of vision, designed to show the unsoundness of that celebrated speculation, by Samuel Bailey. Westminster Review, 38, 318–336.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. K. (2004). On the organism–environment distinction in psychology. Behavior and Philosophy, 32, 317–347.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, E. S. (1988). James J. Gibson and the psychology of perception. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, E. S. (1997). The cognitive revolution from an ecological view. In D. M. Johnson, & C. E. Erneling (Eds.), The future of the cognitive revolution (pp. 261–273). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Santillana, G. de (1959). The role of art in the scientific renaissance. In M. Clagett (Ed.), Critical problems in the history of science (pp. 33–65). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• Stebbing, L. S. (1937). Philosophy and the physicists. London, UK: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Cognitive psychology (3rd ed.). Sydney, Australia: Thomson Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Straker, S. (1976). The eye made “other”: Durer, Kepler, and the mechanisation of light and vision. In L. A. Knafla, M. S. Staum, & T. H. E. Travers (Eds.), Science, technology, and culture in historical perspective. University of Calgary Studies in History, No. 1, 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Thinès, G., Costall, A., & Butterworth, G. (2014). Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• von Bertalanffy, L. (1962). Modern theories of development: An introduction to theoretical biology. New York, NY: Harper Torchbooks. (Original work published 1933)
   Google Scholar
• von Hornbostel, E. M. (1927). The unity of the senses. Psyche, 7, 83–89.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, S., & Katz, S. (1984). Can indirect realism be demonstrated in the psychological laboratory? Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 14, 149–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyburn, G. M., Pickford, R. W., & Hirst, R. J. (1964). Human senses and perception. Edinburgh, UK: Oliver & Boyd.
   Google Scholar