Invariants and Information Pickup in The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems: Implications for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

References

• Baum, W. M. (1973). The correlation-based law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 137–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, W. M. (2012). Rethinking reinforcement: Allocation, induction, and contingency. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 101–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanshard, B., & Skinner, B. F. (1967). The problem of consciousness: A debate. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 27, 317–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrera, F., Sanabria, F., Jiménez, Á. A., & Covarrubias, P. (2013). An affordance analysis of unconditioned lever pressing in rats and hamsters. Behavioural Processes, 92, 36–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costall, A. P. (1984). Are theories of perception necessary? A review of Gibson's The ecological approach to visual perception. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 109–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costall, A. P., & Morris, P. (2015). The “Textbook Gibson”: The assimilation of dissidence. History of Psychology, 18, 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covarrubias, P., Guzmán, R., Cabrera, F., & Jiménez, Á. A. (2011). Las superficies ambientales, la velocidad, y la aceleración en hámsteres y ratas [Environmental surfaces, speed, and acceleration in hamsters and rats]. In H. Martínez, J. J. Irigoyen, F. Cabrera, J. Varela, P. Covarrubias & Á. A. Jiménez (Eds.), Estudios sobre comportamiento y aplicaciones [Studies in behavior and applications] (pp. 95–115). Guadalajara, Mexico: Ediciones de la Noche.
   Google Scholar
• Dent-Read, C., & Zukow-Goldring, P. (1997). Evolving explanations of development: Ecological approaches to organism–environmental systems. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fetterman, J. G. (1996). Dimensions of stimulus complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Fetterman, J. G. (2006). Time and number: Learning, psychophysics, stimulus control, and retention. In E. A. Wasserman & T. R. Zentall (Eds.), Comparative cognition: Experimental explorations of animal intelligence (pp. 285–304). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fetterman, J. G., Stubbs, A. D., & MacEwen, D. (1992). The perception of the extended stimulus. In W. K., Honig & J. G. Fetterman (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of stimulus control (pp. 1–20). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Foxall, G. R. (2007). Intentional behaviorism. Behavior and Philosophy, 35, 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1960). The concept of stimulus in psychology. American Psychologist, 15, 694–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1965). Constancy and invariance in perception. In G. Kepes (Ed.), The nature and art of motion (pp. 60–17). New York, NY: G. Braziller.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1967). Autobiography. In E. G. Boring & G. Linzey (Eds.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 5, pp. 127–143). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1968). What gives rise to the perception of motion? Psychological Review, 75, 335–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to the visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. ( Original work published 1979)
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J., & Gibson, E. J. (1955). Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment? Psychological Review, 62, 32–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin, B. (1990). Gibson, Skinner and perceptual responses. Behavior and Philosophy, 18, 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hendry, D. P. (1969). Reinforcing value of information: Fixed-ratio schedules. In D. P. Hendry (Ed.), Conditioned reinforcement (pp. 300–341). Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, W. K. (1966). Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K. W., Isenhower, R. W., & Hayes, L. J. (2016). A multiscaled approach to privacy. Conductual, 4, 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, Á. A., Sanabria, F., & Cabrera, F. (2017). The effect of lever height on the microstructure of operant behavior. Behavioural Processes, 140, 181–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, T. D. (1997). Comment on Cooper. In C. Dent-Read & P. Zukow-Goldring (Eds.), Evolving explanations of development: Ecological approaches to organism–environmental systems (pp. 87–89). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, T. D., & Pietrewicz, A. T. (1985). Issues in the ecological study of learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, T. D., & Turvey, M. T. (1980). A sketch of an ecological metatheory for theories of learning. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 14, pp. 147–205). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, J. R. (1970). An analysis of the experimental analysis of behavior (TEAB). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 101–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelleher, R. T. (1966). Chaining and conditioned reinforcement. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 160–212). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Killeen, P. R. (1981). Learning as causal inference. In M. L. Commons & J. A. Nevin (Eds.), Quantitative analysis of behavior: Vol.1. Discriminative properties of reinforcement schedules (pp. 289–312). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
   Google Scholar
• Killeen, P. R. (1984). Emergent behaviorism. Behaviorism, 12, 25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Killeen, P. R. (1994). Mathematical principles of reinforcement. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 17, 105–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killeen, P. R. (2014). Pavlov+Skinner = Premak. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 27, 544–568.
   Google Scholar
• Killeen, P. R., & Jacobs, K. W. (2016). Coal is not black, snow is not white, food is not a reinforcer: The roles of affordances and dispositions in the analysis of behavior. The Behavior Analyst. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s40614-016-0080-7
   Google Scholar
• Killeen, P. R., & Pellón, R. (2013). Adjunctive behaviors are operants. Learning and Behavior, 41, 1–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killeen, P. R., & Sitomer, M. T. (2003). MPR. Behavioural Processes, 62, 49–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, E. K. (2009). Behavior analysis and ecological psychology: Past, present, and future. A review of Harry Heft's. Ecological psychology in context. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 92, 275–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donohue, W., & Kitchener, R. (1999). Handbook of behaviorism, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oyama, S. (2000). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rachlin, H. (1992). Teleological behaviorism. American Psychologist, 47, 1371–1382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rilling, M. E. (1992). An ecological approach to stimulus control and tracking. In W. K. Honig & J. G. Fetterman (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of stimulus control (pp. 347–366). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, W. N., & Cumming, W. W. (1963). Behavior and perception. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 5, pp. 213–252). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1948). Superstition in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 168–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1985). Cognitive science and behaviourism. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 291–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1989). The origins of cognitive thought. American Psychologist, 44, 13–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staddon, J. E. R. (1988). Learning as inference. In R. C. Bolles & M. D. Beecher (Eds.), Evolution and learning (pp. 59–77). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Staddon, J. E. R., & Simmelhag, V. L. (1971). The “superstition” experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior. Psychological Review, 78, 3–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrace, H. S. (1966). Stimulus control. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 271–344). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Timberlake, W. (1999). Biological behaviorism. In W. O'Donohue & R. Kitchener (Eds.), Handbook of behaviorism (pp. 243–284). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tolman, E. C. (1932). Purposive behavior in men and animals. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Tonneau, F. (1990). From reflex to memory: Molar sequences in Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning. The Psychological Record, 40, 587–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonneau, F. (2011). Holt's realism: New reasons for behavior analysis. In E. Charles (Ed.), A new look at new realism: The psychology and philosophy of E. B. Holt (pp. 33–55). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Turvey, M. T. (1992). Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology, 4, 173–187.
   Google Scholar
• Turvey, M. T., & Shaw, R. E. (1995). Toward an ecological physics and a physical psychology. In R. L. Solso & D. W. Massaro (Eds.), Science of the mind: 2001 and beyond (pp. 144–169). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uttal, W. R. (1993). Toward a new behaviorism. In S. C. Masin (Ed.), Advances in psychology: Vol. 99. Foundations of perceptual theory (pp. 3–42). North Holland, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Waldman, M. R., Cheng, P. W., Hagmayer, Y., & Blaisdell, A. P. (2008). Causal learning in rats and humans: A minimal rational model. In N. Chater & M. Oaksford (Eds.), The probabilistic mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science (pp. 453–484). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, E. A., & Miller, R. R. (1997). What's elementary about associative learning? Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 573–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K. G. (1991). Psychophysics of direct remembering. In M. L. Commons, J. A. Nevin, & M. C. Davison (Eds.), Signal detection: Mechanisms, models, and applications (pp. 221–237). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, S., & Katz, S. (1981). A direct realistic alternative to the traditional conception of memory. Behaviourism, 9, 227–239.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. A. (2001). The critical dimensions of the response-reinforcer contingency. Behavioural Processes, 54, 111–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withagen, R., & van der Kamp, J. (2010). Towards a new ecological conception of perceptual information: Lessons from a developmental systems perspective. Human Movement Science, 29, 149–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodworth, R. S. (1947). Reinforcement of perception. The American Journal of Psychology, 60, 119–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar