Collective Affordances

References

• Araújo, D., Ramos, J. P., & Lopes, R. J. (2016). Shared affordances guide interpersonal synergies in sport teams. In P. Passos, K. Davids, & J. Y. Chow (Eds.), Interpersonal coordination and performance in social systems (pp. 165–178). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462–479. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.54.7.462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, N. A. (1967). Coordination and regulation of movements. New York: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bratman, M. (1992). Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review, 101 (2), 327–341. doi:10.2307/2185537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brümmer, K. (2015). Mitspielfähigkeit: Sportliches Training Als formative Praxis. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A. (2012). Canonical affordances in context. Avant, 3(2), 85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, R., Fusaroli, R., Duran, N., & Richardson, D. (2014). The self-organization of human interaction. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 59, 43–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, T. (2016). The ties that bind: Unintentional spontaneous synchrony in social interactions. In P. Passos, K. Davids, & J. Y. Chow (Eds.), Interpersonal coordination and performance in social systems (pp. 53–64). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Di Nucci, E. (2013). Mindlessness. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Doris, J. M. (2002). Lack of character. Cambridge; UK, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L. (2005). Overcoming the myth of the mental: how philosophers can profit from the phenomenology of everyday expertise. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 79(2), 47–65.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfand, I. M., & Tsetlin, M. L. (1966/1971). On mathematical modeling of the mechanisms of the central nervous system. In I. M. Gelfand, V. S. Gurfinkel, S. V. Formin, & M. L. Tsetlin (Eds.), Models of the structural-functional organization of certain biological systems (pp. 9–26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, M. (1990). Walking together. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 15(1), 1–14. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.1990.tb00202.x
   Google Scholar
• Haugeland, J. (1998). Mind embodied and embedded. In J. Haugeland (Ed.), Having thought essays in the metaphysics of mind (pp. 207–238). Cambridge; MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism. Cambridge; MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutto, D. D., & Myin, E. (2017). Evolving enactivism. Cambridge; MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 54, pp. 59–101). Burlington: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2008). Intentionality in basic social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1499), 2021–2031. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latash, M. L. (2008). Synergy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. (2013). When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 749–775. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.3.04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2017). Group-based emotion in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(5), 658–668. doi:10.1177/1368430217702725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, K. L., Johnston, L., Richardson, M. J., & Schmidt, R. C. (2009). Towards a radically embodied, embedded social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1217–1225. doi:10.1002/ejsp.666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, K. L., & Maegher, B. R. (2016). Affordances and interpersonal coordination. In P. Passos, K. Davids, & J. Y. Chow (Eds.), Interpersonal coordination and performance in social systems (pp. 245–258). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J., Baron, R. M., & Schmidt, R. C. (2006). Contrasting approaches to perceiving and acting with others. Ecological Psychology, 18(1), 1–38. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco1801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaeler, M. (2018). Subjektivierung eines Volleyballteams als spielfähiger Kollektivkörper. In T. Alkemeyer, U. Bröckling, & T. Peter (Eds.), Jenseits der Person. Zur Subjektivierung von Kollektiven (pp. 295–314). Bielefeld: Transcipt Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, C. F., & Carello, C. (1981). Direct perception. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, L., Lumsden, J., Richardson, M., & Macrae, C. (2011). Do birds of a feather move together? Group membership and behavioral synchrony. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 495–503. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2641-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Passos, P., & Chow, J. Y. (2016). Interpersonal coordination in team sports. In P. Passos, K. Davids, & J. Y. Chow (Eds.), Interpersonal coordination and performance in social systems (pp. 154–164). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., & Baron, R. M. (2007). Judging and Actualizing Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 845–859. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., Isenhower, R., Goodman, J., & Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science, 26(6), 867–891. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2007.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2010). Challenging the egocentric view of coordinated perceiving, acting, and knowing. In B. Mesquita, L. F. Barrett, & E. R. Smith (Eds.), The mind in context (pp. 307–333). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld, E. (2008). Unreflective action (Dissertation). Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, M. A., Richardson, M. J., Shockley, K., & Ramenzoni, V. (2011). Interpersonal Synergies. Frontiers in Psychology, 2 (38), 1–7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00038
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romdenh-Romluc, K. (2013). Habit and attention. In R. T. Jensen & D. Moran (Eds.), The phenomenology of embodied subjectivity (pp. 3–19). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation. London: Pinter & Martin.
   Google Scholar
• Schweikard, D., & Schmid, H. B. (2013). Collective intentionality. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/collective-intentionality/
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1990). Collective intentions and actions. In J. R. Cohen, J. L. Morgan & M. E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 401–415). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Jumping on the ecological bandwagon? Mind the gap! European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1230–1233. doi:10.1002/ejsp.688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, P., Garganta, J., Araújo, D., Davids, K., & Aguiar, P. (2013). Shared knowledge or shared affordances? Insights from an ecological dynamics approach to team coordination in sports. Sports Medicine, 43(9), 765–772. doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0070-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 297–315). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. R., Seger, C. R., & Mackie, D. M. (2007). Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 431–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life. Cambridge; MA; London: Belknap.
   Google Scholar
• Tollefsen, D., & Dale, R. (2012). Naturalizing joint action: A process-based approach. Philosophical Psychology, 25(3), 385–407. doi:10.1080/09515089.2011.579418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M., & Rakoczy, H. (2003). What makes human cognition unique? From individual to shared to collective intentionality. Mind and Language, 18(2), 121–147. doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuomela, R., & Miller, K. (1988). We-Intentions. Philosophical Studies, 53 (3), 367–389. doi:10.1007/BF00353512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Turvey, M. T. (1992). Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology, 4(3), 173–187. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0403_3
   Google Scholar
• Turvey, M. T., & Shaw, R. E. (1979). The primacy of perceiving: An ecological reformulation of perception for understanding memory. Perspectives on Memory Research, 167–222.
   Google Scholar
• Valenti, S. S., & Gold, J. M. M. (1991). Social affordances and interaction I: Introduction. Ecological Psychology, 3(2), 77–98. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0302_2
   Google Scholar
• Vallacher, R., Read, S., & Nowak, A. (2002). The dynamical perspective in personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(4), 264–273. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0604_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. T., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weichold, M. (2015). Zwischen Reflex und Reflexion. Intelligenz und Rationalität im unreflektierten Handeln. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Weichold, M. (2018). Situated agency: Towards an affordance-based, sensorimotor theory of action. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17(4), 761–785. doi:10.1007/s11097-017-9548-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withagen, R., Poel, H. J., Araújo, D., & Pepping, G.-J. (2012). Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 250–258. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, L., Cardwell, W., & Mark, L. S. (2009). Perceiving multiple affordances for objects. Ecological Psychology, 21(3), 185–217. doi:10.1080/10407410903058229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar