Affordances in a Multispecies Entanglement

References

• Baggs, E., & Chemero, A. (2018). Radical embodiment in two directions. Synthese, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02020-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemero, A., & Turvey, M. T. (2007). Complexity, hypersets, and the ecological perspective on perception-action. Biological Theory, 2(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2007.2.1.23
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A. (1997). The meaning of things. Social Analysis, 41(1), 76–85.
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A. (1999). An iconoclast's triptych: Edward Reed’s ecological philosophy. Theory & Psychology, 9(3), 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354399093011
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A. (2004). From Darwin to Watson (and cognitivism) and back again: The principle of animal-environment mutuality. Behavior and Philosophy, 32, 179–195.
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A., & Still, A. (1989). Gibson’s theory of direct perception and the problem of cultural relativism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19(4), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1989.tb00159.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haan, S. (2020). Enactive psychiatry. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3(4), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070405
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature. Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dings, R. (2018). Understanding phenomenological differences in how affordances solicit action. An exploration. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17(4), 681–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-017-9534-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L., & Kelly, S. D. (2007). Heterophenomenology: Heavy-handed sleight-of-hand. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(1–2), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-006-9042-y
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1975). Events are perceivable but time is not. In J. T. Fraser & N. Lawrence (Eds.), The study of time II (pp. 295–301). Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (1989). Affordances and the body: An intentional analysis of Gibson’s ecological approach to visual perception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1989.tb00133.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (1996). The ecological approach to navigation: A Gibsonian perspective. In J. Portugali (Ed.), The construction of cognitive maps (pp. 105–132). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James’s radical empiricism. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2003). Affordances, dynamic experience, and the challenge of reification. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 149–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmreich, S. (2009). Alien ocean: Anthropological voyages in microbial seas. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2015). The life of lines. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kaaronen, R. (2017). Affording sustainability: Adopting a theory of affordances as a guiding heuristic for environmental policy. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1974–1913. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchhoff, M. (2015). Extended cognition and the causal-constitutive fallacy: In search for a diachronic and dynamical conception of constitution. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 90(2), 320–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiverstein, J., Van Dijk, L., & Rietveld, E. (2019). The field and landscape of affordances: Koffka’s two environments revisited. Synthese, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02123-x
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1932). The philosophy of the present. Open Court Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, W. G. (1981). Gibsonian theory and the pragmatist perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 11(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1981.tb00023.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, E. S. (1996). Encountering the world: Toward an ecological psychology. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld, E. S., & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2014.958035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolshausen, G., Segelbacher, G., Hobson, K. A., & Schaefer, H. M. (2009). Contemporary evolution of reproductive isolation and phenotypic divergence in sympatry along a migratory divide. Current Biology, 19(24), 2097–2101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D. B. (2012). Multispecies knots of ethical time. Environmental Philosophy, 9(1), 127–140.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, R. E., Kinsella-Shaw, J. M., & Mace, W. M. (2019). Affordance types and affordance tokens: Are Gibson’s affordances trustworthy? Ecological Psychology, 31(1), 49–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2018.1508353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shotter, J. (1983). “Duality of structure” and “intentionality” in an ecological psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 13(1), 19–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1983.tb00460.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turvey, M. T. (1992). Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology, 4(3), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0403_3
   Google Scholar
• Turvey, M. T. (2019). Lectures on perception: An ecological perspective. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, L. (2021). Psychology in an indeterminate world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620958005
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, L. (2020). Temporalizing ontology: A case for pragmatic emergence. Synthese, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02615-1
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, L., & Kiverstein, J. (2020). Direct perception in context: Radical empiricist reflections on the medium. Synthese, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02578-3
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, L., & Myin, E. (2019). Reasons for pragmatism: Affording epistemic contact in a shared environment. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 18(5), 973–925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9595-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, L., & Rietveld, E. (2021). Situated anticipation. Synthese, 198(1), 349–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02013-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, L., & Withagen, R. (2016). Temporalizing agency: Moving beyond on-and offline cognition. Theory & Psychology, 26(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315596080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, L., Withagen, R. G., & Bongers, R. M. (2015). Information without content: A Gibsonian reply to enactivists' worries. Cognition, 134, 210–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, T. (2014). Flight ways: Life and loss at the edge of extinction. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, T. (2019). The wake of crows: Living and dying in shared worlds. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaz, D. (2015). Direct perception requires an animal-dependent concept of specificity and of information. Ecological Psychology, 27(2), 144–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2015.1027128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, W. H. (2006). The dynamics of perception and action. Psychological Review, 113(2), 358–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withagen, R. (2018). Towards an ecological approach to emotions and the individual differences therein. New Ideas in Psychology, 51(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.04.004
   Google Scholar
• Withagen, R., De Poel, H. J., Araújo, D., & Pepping, G. (2012). Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withagen, R., & Van der Kamp, J. (2010). Towards a new ecological conception of perceptual information: Lessons from a developmental systems perspective. Human Movement Science, 29(1), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2009.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar