Numerical Simulation of One-Dimensional Two-Phase Flow Using a Pressure-Based Algorithm

REFERENCES

• F. Barre and M. Bernard The CATHARE Code Strategy and Assessment, Nucl. Eng. Des., vol. 124, pp. 257–284, 1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. H. Bendiksen., The Dynamic Two-Fluid Model OLGA: Theory and Application, SPE Prod. Eng., vol. 6, pp. 171–180, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• N. Neimarliaja, I. Demirdzic, and S. Muzaferja Numerical Method for Calculation Two-Phase Electrohydrodynamic Flows in Electrostatic Precipitators, Numer. Heat Transfer A, vol. 59, pp. 321–348, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. M. Masella., Transient Simulation of Two-Phase Flows in Pipes, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 24, pp. 739–755, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. B. Stewart and B. Wendroff Review Article; Two-Phase Flow: Models and Methods, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 56, pp. 363–409, 1984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Fayssal and F. Moukalled A New Numerical Approach for Predicting the Two-Phase Flow of Refrigerants During Evaporation and Condensation, Numer. Heat Transfer B, vol. 62, pp. 341–369, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Coquel., A Numerical Method Using Upwind Schemes for the Resolution of Two-Phase Flows, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 136, pp. 272–288, 1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. R. Lies and W. H. Reed A Semi-Implicit Method for Two-Phase Fluid Dynamics, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 126, pp. 390–407, 1978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Mahaffy A Stability-Enhancing Two-Step Method for Fluid Flow Calculation. J. Comput. Phys., vol. 46, pp. 329–341, 1982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Cortes., A Density Perturbation Method to Study the Eigen Structure of Two-Phase Flow Equation Systems, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 147, pp. 463–484, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. L. Roe, Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors and Difference Schemes, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 43, pp. 357–372, 1981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Toumi and A. Kumbaro An Approximate Linearized Riemann Solver for a Two-Fluid Model, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 124, pp. 286–300, 1996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. E. Romate An Approximate Riemann Solver for a Two-Phase Flow Model with Numerically Given Slip Relation, Comput. Fluids, vol. 27, pp. 455–477, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. A. Trapp and R. A. Riemke A Nearly-Implicit Hydrodynamic Numerical Scheme for Two-Phase Flows, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 66, pp. 62–82, 1986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. K. Fjelde and K. H. Karlsen High-Resolution Hybrid Primitive-Conservative Upwind Schemes for the Drift Flux Model, Comput. Fluids, vol. 31, pp. 335–367, 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. M. Masella, I. Faille, and T. Gallouet On an Approximate Godunov Scheme, Int. J. Comput. Fluid. Dyn., vol. 12, pp. 133–149, 1999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Y. Niu Advection Upwinding Splitting Method to Solve a Compressible Two-Fluid Model, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, vol. 36, pp. 351–371, 2001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Paillère, C. Corre, and J. R. G. Cascales On the Extension of the AUSM + Scheme to Compressible Two-Fluid Models, Comput. Fluids, vol. 32, pp. 891–916, 2003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Evje, and T. Flatten. Hybrid Flux-Splitting Schemes for a Common Two Fluid Model, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 192, pp. 175–210, 2003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. S. Yeom and K. S. Chang A Modified HLLC-type Riemann Solver for the Compressible Six-Equation Two-Fluid Model, Comput. Fluids, vol. 76, pp. 86–104, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. R. Garćıa-Cascales H. Paillère. Application of AUSM Schemes to Multi-Dimensional Compressible Two-Phase Flow Problems, Nucl. Eng. Des., vol. 236, pp. 1225–1239, 2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. S. Chung., A Numerical Study of Two-Phase Flow Using a Two-Dimensional Two-Fluid Model. Numer. Heat Transfer A, vol. 45, pp. 1049–1066, 2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. S. Yeom and K. S. Chang Two-Dimensional Two-Fluid Two-Phase Flow Simulation Using an Approximate Jacobian Matrix for HLL Scheme, Numer. Heat Transfer B, vol. 56, pp. 372–392, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Darwish., A Unified Formulation of the Segregated Class of Algorithms for Multifluid Flow at All Speeds. Numer. Heat Transfer B, vol. 40, pp. 99–137, 2001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Morales-Ruiz., Numerical Resolution of the Liquid-Vapor Two-Phase Flow by Means of the Two-Fluid Model and a Pressure Based Method. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 43, pp. 118–130, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. I. Issa and M. H. W. Kempf Simulation of Slug Flow in Horizontal and Nearly Horizontal Pipes with the Two-Fluid Model. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, vol. 29, pp. 69–95, 2003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Datta, V. H. Gada, and A. Sharma Analytical and Level-Set Method-Based Numerical Study for Two-Phase Stratified Flow in a Plane Channel and a Square Duct, Numer. Heat Transfer A, vol. 60, pp. 347–380, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Hejazian, M. K. Moraveji, and A. Beheshti Comparative Numerical Investigation on TiO2/Water Nanofluid Turbulent Flow by Implementation of Single Phase and Two Phase Approaches, Numer. Heat Transfer A, vol. 66, pp. 330–348, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Abgrall and R. Saurel Discrete Equations for Physical and Numerical Compressible Multiphase Mixtures, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 186, pp. 361–396, 2003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Bestion The Physical Closure Laws in the CATHARE code. Nucl. Eng. Des., vol. 124, pp. 229–244, 1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. C. March and R. C. Maslika A Non-Orthogonal Finite-Volume Method for Solution of All Speed Flows Using Collocated Variables, Numer. Heat Transfer, B, vol. 26. pp. 293–311, 1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. V. Patankar Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• M. S. Darwish and F. Moukalled Normalized Variable and Space Formulation Methodology for High-Resolution Schemes, Numer. Heat Transfer B, vol. 26, pp. 79–96. 1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. K. Sweby High Resolution Schemes Using Flux Limiters for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 21, pp. 995–1011, 1984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. P. Leonard and S. Mokhtari Beyond 1st-Order Upwinding-The Ultrasgarp Alternative for Nonoscillatory Steady-State Simulation of Convection, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., vol. 30, pp. 729–266, 1990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. W. Thomas Numerical Partial Differential Equations, Springer, Berlin, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• R. J. LeVeque Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws, Birkhauser, Basel, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• P. K. Khosla., A Diagonally Dominate Second Order Accurate Implicit Scheme, Comput. Fluids, vol. 2, pp. 207–209, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• V. H. Ransom Numerical Benchmark Tests, Multiphase Sci. Technol., vol. 3, pp. 465–473, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• G. S. Yeom and K. S. Chang Flux-Based Wave Decomposition Scheme for an Isentropic Hyperbolic Two-Fluid Model. Numer. Heat Transfer B, vol. 59, pp. 288–318, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Abgrall How to Prevent Pressure Oscillations in Multicomponent Flow Calculations: A Quasi Conservative Approach, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 125, pp. 150–160, 1996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. H. Gaskell and A. K. C. Lau Curvature Compensated Convective Transport: SMART, a New Boundedness Preserving Transport Algorithm, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, vol. 8, pp. 617–641, 1988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar