Research on improvements of low Reynolds number turbulence model based on flow around automobiles

References

• K. Ambo, T. Yoshino, and T. Kawamura “Comparison between wall-modeled and wall-resolved large eddy simulations for the prediction of boundary-layer separation around the side mirror of a full-scale vehicle,” 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Grapevine, TX, USA, Jan., 2017. DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-1661.
   Google Scholar
• M. Tsubokura, T. Nakashima, M. Kitayama, Y. Ikawa, D. H. Doh, and T. Kobayashi, “Large eddy simulation on the unsteady aerodynamic response of a road vehicle in transient crosswinds,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1075–1086, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2010.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. E. Aljure, O. Lehmkuhl, I. Rodríguez, and A. Oliva, “Flow and turbulent structures around simplified car models,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 96, no. 96, pp. 122–135, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.03.013.
   Google Scholar
• F. A. Vanherpe, R. Haidar, and Q. Chao, “Estimation of automotive wind noise by coupling a lattice Boltzmann based flow simulation to statistical energy analysis,” 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Lyon, France, June, 2016. DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-2912.
   Google Scholar
• K. Kitch, T. Kobayashi, and N. Taniguchi, “Numerical simulation of the turbulent flow around a 2D automobile,” Programme-18th International Symposium on Automotive Technology and Automation, Florence, Italy, May, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• T. Han, “Computational analysis of three-dimensional turbulent flow around a bluff bodying round proximity,” AIAA J., vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1213–1219, 1989. DOI: 10.2514/3.10248.
   Google Scholar
• P. Gillieron and F. Chometon, “Modelling of stationary three-dimensional separated air flows around an Ahmed reference model,” ESAIM Proc., vol. 7, pp. 173–182, 1999. DOI: 10.1051/proc:1999016.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Gu, Z. Chen, C. Feng, T. Huang, and Z. Yang, “Research on the aerodynamic characteristics of the Ahmed body with a modified LRN k-ɛ turbulence model using a transition-code based method,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1771–1780, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s13369-015-1985-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Jakirlić, R. Jester-Zürker, and C. Tropea, “Report on 9th ERCOFTAC/IAHR/COST Workshop on refined turbulence modelling,” Darmstadt Univ. Technol., vol. 55, pp. 36–43, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• E. Guilmineau, “Computational study of flow around a simplified car body,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., vol. 96, no. 6–7, pp. 1207–1217, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2007.06.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Senthooran, B. Crouse, and G. Balasubramanian, “Simulation of wall pressure fluctuations on simplified automobile shapes using a lattice Boltzmann Method,” ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Orlando, FL, USA, Nov., 2005.
   Google Scholar
• B. Khalighi, K. H. Chen, and G. Iaccarino, “Unsteady aerodynamic flow investigation around a simplified square-back road vehicle with drag reduction devices,” J. Fluids Eng. Trans. ASME, vol. 134, no. 6, pp. 61–101, 2012. DOI: 10.1115/1.4006643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Durbin, “Separated flow computations with the k-epsilon-v-squared model,” AIAA J., vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 659–664, 1995. DOI: 10.2514/3.12628.
   Google Scholar
• A. Buljac, H. Kozmar, and I. Dzijan, “Aerodynamic performance of the underbody and wings of an open-wheel race car,” Trans. Famena, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 19–34, 2016. DOI: 10.21278/TOF.40202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. G. Speziale, S. Sarkar, and T. B. Gatski, “Modeling the pressure-strain correlation of turbulence: An invariant dynamical systems approach,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 227, pp. 245–1067, 1991. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112091000101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Mathey and D. Cokljat, “Zonal multi-domain RANS/LES simulation of airflow over the Ahmed body,” 6th International Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements (ETMM6), Cagliari, Italy, May, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• N. Ashton and A. Revell, “Key factors in the use of DDES for the flow around a simplified car,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, vol. 54, no. 43, pp. 236–249, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2015.06.002.
   Google Scholar
• N. Ashton, A. West, S. Lardeau, and A. Revell, “Assessment of RANS and DES methods for realistic automotive models,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 128, pp. 1–15, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Adams, M. Cremer, and J. Valentine, “Use of CFD modeling for design of NOx reduction systems in utility boilers,” International Joint Power Generation Conference, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, June, 2002. DOI: 10.1115/IJPGC2002-26081.
   Google Scholar
• K. R. Laflin, S. M. Klansmeyer, and T. Zickuhr, “Summary of data from the second AIAA CFD drag prediction workshop(invited),” 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, Jan., 2004.
   Google Scholar
• H. K. Versteeg and W. Malalasekera, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method. New York, NY: Wiley, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• B. Alessia and S. Quirico, “On a RSM approach to the multihead weigher configuration,” ASME 2012 11th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, Nantes, France, July, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• D. C. Wilcox, “Reassessment of the scale determining equation for advanced turbulence models,” AIAA J., vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1299–1310, 1988. DOI: 10.2514/3.10041.
   Google Scholar
• X. Zheng, C. Liu, F. Liu, and C.-I. Yang, “Turbulent transition simulation using the k-ω model,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 907–926, 1998. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980715)42:5<907::AID-NME393>3.0.CO;2-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Ovchinnikov, U. Piomelli, and M. M. Choudhari, “Numerical simulations of boundary layer bypass transition with leading edge effects,” 4th International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, Williansburg, VA, USA, June, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• J. Y. You and O. J. Kwon, “A blended model for simulating massive flow separation and laminar-turbulence transition,” 42nd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, San Diego, CA USA, June, 2012. DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-2971.
   Google Scholar
• F. Hamba, “A hybrid RANS/LES simulation of turbulent channel flow,” Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 387–403, 2003. DOI: 10.1007/s00162-003-0089-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Girimaji, R. Srinivasan, and E. Jeong, “RANS turbulence models for seamless transition between RANS and LES: Fixed point analyses and preliminary results,” 4th Joint Fluids Summer Engineering Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, July, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• J. Franke and W. Frank, “Large eddy simulation of the flow past a circular cylinder at ReD = 3900,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 1191–1206, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00232-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. K. Lilly, “A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure model,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 633–635, 1992. DOI: 10.1063/1.858280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Tsuei and O. Savas, “Transient aerodynamics of vehicle platoons during in-line oscillations,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., vol. 89, no. 13, pp. 1085–1111, 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00073-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Jiang, Simulation Analysis and Control of Automobile Aerodynamic Noisebased on Hybrid FE-SEA Method. Changsha, China: Hunan University, 2016, pp. 32–52.
   Google Scholar
• J. García, J. Muñoz-Paniagua, and A. Jiménez, “Numerical study of the influence of synthetic turbulent inflow conditions on the aerodynamics of a train,” J. Fluids Struct., vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 134–151, 2015.
   Google Scholar