Fluid–structure interaction investigation for coal-water slurry preheaters: Effects of different loads on mechanical performance

References

• W. Y. Chen and R. N. Xu, “Clean coal technology development in China,” Energy Policy, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 2123–2130, May 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. K. Manfred, “Coal-water slurry: a status report,” Energy, vol. 11, no. 11–12, pp. 1157–1162, Nov–Dec. 1986. DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(86)90052-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Saeki and H. Usui, “Heat transfer characteristics of coal-water mixtures,” Can. J. Chem. Eng, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 400–404, Jun. 1995. DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450730317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Xiao, S. M. Wang, S. P. Ye, J. Y. Dong, J. Wen and Z. X. Zhang, “Thermo-economic optimization of gasification process with coal water slurry preheating technology,” Energy, vol. 199, pp. 117354, May 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Xiao, S. M. Wang, S. P. Ye, J. R. Wang, J. Wen and J. Y. Tu, “Experimental investigation on pre-heating technology of coal water slurry with different concentration in shell-and-tube heat exchangers with ladder-type fold baffles,” Int. J. Heat Mass. Trans., vol. 132, pp. 1116–1125, Apr. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.12.082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. G. Xu, Y. Wei, D. G. Guo, L. Zhang and W. Q. Wang, “Numerical investigation of thermo-mechanical stress in U-tube including forming effect for the SCC failure analysis,” Eng. Fail. Anal., vol. 77, pp. 126–137, Jul. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Laskin and B. Volfson, “Numerical analytic approach to a calculation of a thermal stress state of shell and tube heat exchangers,” presented at the Proc. ASME 2013 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 2013. No. PVP2013-97930. DOI: 10.1115/PVP2013-97930.
   Google Scholar
• H. F. Li, C. F. Qian and X. D. Yu, “Effects of Tube Stiffness and tubesheet thickness on the thermal stress of the tubes and tubesheet,” Adv. Mater. Res., vol. 314–316, pp. 1552–1555, Aug. 2011. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.314-316.1552.
   Google Scholar
• H. Chen, J. M. Gong, S. T. Tu and L. Y. Geng, “Study of parameter effects on residual stresses and thermal deformation of brazed plate-fin structure using finite element method,” J. Pressure Vessel Technol., vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 041202-1–041202-6, Nov. 2008. DOI: 10.1115/1.2967740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. X. Cao, X. Q. Qiu and W. C. Jiang, “Analysis of thermal stresses in 304 stainless steel plate-fin structure,” AMR, vol. 681, pp. 286–290, Apr. 2013. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.681.286.
   Google Scholar
• H. Q. Ma, et al., “The influence of structure parameters on stress of plate-fin structures in LNG heat exchanger,” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., vol. 34, pp. 85–99, Aug. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Xu, J. X. Feng and S. C. Zhang, “Effects of different loads on structure stress of “L”-type large-diameter buried pipe network based on fluid-structure-heat coupling,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Tran, vol. 86, pp. 222–230, Aug. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.07.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Xiao, S. M. Wang, S. P. Ye, J. Wen and Z. X. Zhang, “Multiphysics field coupling simulation for shell-and-tube heat exchangers with different baffles,” Numer. Heat Trans. A Appl., vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 266–283, Nov. 2020. DOI: 10.1080/10407782.2019.1688055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. J. Zhang, Z. Q. Qian, J. Deng and Y. T. Yin, “Fluid–structure interaction numerical simulation of thermal performance and mechanical property on plate-fins heat exchanger,” Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 1337–1353, Feb. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s00231-015-1507-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Li, J. Wen, S. M. Wang and Y. Z. Li, “Multi-parameter optimization of serrated fins in plate-fin heat exchanger based on fluid-structure interaction,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 176, pp. 115357, Jul. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wen, K. Li, X. Zhang, C. L. Wang, S. M. Wang and J. Y. Tu, “Optimization investigation on configuration parameters of serrated fin in plate-fin heat exchanger based on fluid structure interaction analysis,” Int. J. Heat Mass. Tran., vol. 119, pp. 282–294, Apr. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.11.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. M. Wang, G. P. Jian, J. Xiao, J. Wen, Z. X. Zhang and J. Y. Tu, “Fluid-thermal-structural analysis and structural optimization of spiral-wound heat exchanger,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass. Tran., vol. 95, pp. 42–52, Jul. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2018.03.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. T. İnan, H. Köten and M. A. Kartal, “Experimental comparison and CFD analysis of conventional shell and tube heat exchanger with new design geometry at different baffle intervals,” Numer. Heat Trans. A Appl., vol. 83, pp. 522–533, Jul. 2022. DOI: 10.1080/10407782.2022.2101801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. T. Du, W. J. Du, K. Che and L. Cheng, “Parametric Optimization of overlapped helical baffled heat exchangers by Taguchi method,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 85, pp. 334–339, Jun. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.02.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Fesanghary, E. Damangir and I. Soleimani, “Design optimization of shell and tube heat exchangers using global sensitivity analysis and harmony search algorithm,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 29, no. 5–6, pp. 1026–1031, Apr. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2008.05.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Lambert and L. Gosselin, “Sensitivity analysis of heat exchanger design to uncertainties of correlations,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 136, pp. 531–540, May 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.03.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. M. Shirvan, M. Mamourian, S. Mirzakhanlari and R. Ellahi, “Numerical investigation of heat exchanger effectiveness in a double pipe heat exchanger filled with nanofluid: a sensitivity analysis by response surface methodology,” Powder Technol., vol. 313, pp. 99–111, May 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2017.02.065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. M. Shirvan, M. Mamourian, S. Mirzakhanlari and J. A. Esfahani, “Experimental investigation on thermal performance and economic analysis of cosine wave tube structure in a shell and tube heat exchanger,” Energ. Convers. Manage., vol. 175, pp. 86–98, Nov. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Rashidi, M. Bovand and J. A. Esfahani, “Sensitivity analysis for entropy generation in porous solar heat exchangers by RSM,” J. Thermophys. Heat Trans., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 390–402, Oct. 2017. DOI: 10.2514/1.T5003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. E. Nakhchi and J. A. Esfahani, “Sensitivity analysis of a heat exchanger tube fitted with cross-cut twisted tape with alternate axis,” J. Heat Trans., vol. 141, no. 4, pp. 041902, Apr. 2019. DOI: 10.1115/1.4042780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Z. Qiao, Z. F. Jing, X. R. Ma, S. Z. Wang and D. H. Xu, “Thermal–hydraulic characteristics and structure optimization of Z-channel printed circuit heat exchanger,” Numer. Heat Trans. A Appl., pp. 1–21, Aug. 2022. DOI: 10.1080/10407782.2022.2105111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wen, H. Z. Yang, G. P. Jian, X. Tong, K. Li and S. M. Wang, “Energy and cost optimization of shell and tube heat exchanger with helical baffles using Kriging metamodel based on MOGA,” Int. J. Heat Mass. Trans., vol. 98, pp. 29–39, Jul. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.02.084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. M. Wang, G. P. Jian, J. Xiao, J. Wen and Z. X. Zhang, “Optimization investigation on configuration parameters of spiral-wound heat exchanger using Genetic Aggregation response surface and Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 119, pp. 603–609, Jun. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.03.100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Most and J. Will, “Metamodel of optimal prognosis: an automatic approach for variable reduction and optimal metamodel selection,” Dynardo, Weimar, Germany, Technical Report, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• T. Most and J. Will, “Recent advances in meta-model of optimal prognosis,” Dynardo, Weimar, Germany, Technical Report, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• T. Most and J. Will, “Sensitivity analysis using the metamodel of optimal prognosis,” Dynardo, Weimar, Germany, Technical Report, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• F. Frese, J. Einzinger and J. Will, “Design optimisation of an impeller with CFD and Meta-Model of optimal Prognosis (MoP),” presented at the 10th Int. Conf. Turbochargers and Turbocharging, pp. 121–134, 2012. DOI: 10.1533/9780857096135.3A.121.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Jaouadi, T. Abbas, G. Morgenthal and T. Lahmer, “Single and multi-objective shape optimization of streamlined bridge decks,” Struct. Multidisc. Optim., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1495–1514, Feb. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00158-019-02431-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. M. Sobol, “Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models,” Math. Model. Comput. Exp., vol. 407, pp. 112–118, Mar. 1993.
   Google Scholar
• T. Homma and A. Saltelli, “Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1–17, Apr. 1996. DOI: 10.1016/0951-8320(96)00002-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar