Extending a low-order upwind-biased scheme to solve turbulent flames using detailed chemistry model

References

• Z. H. Yan, “Parallel computation of turbulent combustion and flame spread in fires,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part B: Fundam., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 585–602, 2001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. H. Yan, “Parallel computation of turbulent combustion and flame spread in fires,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part B: Fundam., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 191–208, 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Kang and Y. Kim, “Parallel unstructured-grid finite-volume method for turbulent nonpremixed flames using the flamelet model,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part B: Fundam., vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 525–547, 2003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Ren and S. B. Pope, “Second-order splitting schemes for a class of reactive systems,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 227, no. 17, pp. 8165–8176, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Lu and C. K. Law, “Toward accommodating realistic fuel chemistry in large-scale computations,” Prog. Ener. Combust. Sci., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 192–215, 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Ren, C. Xu, T. Lu, and M. A. Singer, “Dynamic adaptive chemistry with operator splitting schemes for reactive flow simulations,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 263, pp. 19–36, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. L. Ziegler, R. Deiterding, J. E. Shepherd, and D. I. Pullin, “An adaptive high-order hybrid scheme for compressive, viscous flows with detailed chemistry,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 230, no. 20, pp. 7598–7630, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Savard, Y. Xuan, B. Bobbitt, and G. Blanquart, “A computationally-efficient, semi-implicit, iterative method for the time-integration of reacting flows with stiff chemistry,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 295, pp. 740–769, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. C. Y. Yuen, G. H. Yeoh, V. Timchenko, and T. Barber, “LES and multi-step chemical reaction in compartment fires,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part A: Appl., vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 711–736, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. M. Orbegoso, L. F. F. da Silva, and R. Serfaty, “Comparative study of thermal radiation properties models in turbulent non-premixed sooting combustion,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part A: Appl., vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 166–179, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Sui, F. Yang, and W. Kong, “Large eddy simulation of methane/air lifted flame with hot co-flow,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part A: Appl., vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 282–292, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. F. Azarkhavarani, B. Lessani, and S. Tabejamaat, “Artificial compressibility method on half-staggered grid for laminar radiative diffusion flames in axisymmetric coordinates,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part B: Fundam., vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 392–407, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Yang and J. Zhang, “Simulation of swirl-stabilized turbulent partially premixed combustion,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part A: Appl., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 189–201, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Ma and Y. Yu, “Numerical and experimental analyses of the characteristics of burning jets of base bleed ignited in the atmospheric environment,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part A: Appl., vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 1141–1158, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. D. Raithby and K. E. Torrance, “Upstream-weighted differencing schemes and their application to elliptic problems involving fluid flow,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 191–206, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• G. D. Raithby, “A critical evaluation of upstream differencing applied to problems involving fluid flow,” Computer Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 75–103, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• G. D. Raithby, “Skew upstream differencing schemes for problems involving fluid flow,” Computer Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 153–164, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• M. A. Leschziner, “Practical evaluation of three finite difference schemes for the computation of steady-state recirculating flows,” Computer Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 293–312, 1980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zhu and M. A. Leschziner, “A local oscillation-damping algorithm for higher-order convection schemes,” Computer Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 355–366, 1988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.-S. Lien and M. A. Leschziner, “A pressure-velocity solution strategy for compressible flow and its application to shock/boundary-layer interaction using second-moment turbulence closure,” J. Fluids Eng., vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 717–725, 1993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. K. Versteeg and W. Malalasekera, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method. New York: Longman Scientific & Technical, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• C. M. Rhie and W. L. Chow, “Numerical study of the turbulent flow past an airfoil with trailing edge separation,” AIAA J., vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 1525–1532, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• G. E. Schneider and M. J. Raw, “Control volume finite-element method for heat transfer and fluid flow using colocated variables-1. Computational procedure,” Numer. Heat Transf., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 363–390, 1987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Darbandi and M. Ghafourizadeh, “Extending a hybrid finite-volume-element method to solve laminar diffusive flame,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part B: Fundam., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 181–210, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Darbandi and M. Ghafourizadeh, “Solving turbulent diffusion flame in cylindrical frame applying an improved advective kinetics scheme,” Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dyn., vol. 29, no. 5–6, pp. 413–431, 2015. –December
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Qin et al., “Combustion chemistry of propane: a case study of detailed reaction mechanism optimization,” Proc. Combust. Inst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1663–1669, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• J. H. Kent and D. Honnery, “Soot and mixture fraction in turbulent diffusion flames,” Combust. Sci. Technol., vol. 54, no. 1–6, pp. 383–397, 1987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. M. Woolley, M. Fairweather, and Yunardi, “Conditional moment closure modelling of soot formation in turbulent, non-premixed methane and propane flames,” Fuel, vol. 88, pp. 393–407, 2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• M. Darbandi and G. E. Schneider, “Momentum variable procedure for solving compressible and incompressible flows,” AIAA J., vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1801–1805, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• M. Darbandi, E. Roohi, and V. Mokarizadeh, “Conceptual linearization of euler governing equations to solve high speed compressible flow using a pressure-based method,” Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Eq., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 583–604, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. A. Leschziner and W. Rodi, “Calculation of annular and twin parallel jets using various discretization schemes and turbulence-model variations,” J. Fluids Eng., vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 352–360, 1981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Fu, P. G. Huang, B. E. Launder, and M. A. Leschziner, “A comparison of algebraic and differential second-moment closures for axisymmetric turbulent shear flows with and without swirl,” J. Fluids Eng., vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 216–221, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• T. F. Miller and F. W. Schmidt, “Use of a pressure-weighted interpolation method for the solution of the incompressible navier-stokes equations on a non-staggered grid system,” Numer. Heat Transf., vol. 14, pp. 213–233, 1988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Peric, R. Kessler, and G. Scheuere, “Comparison of finite-volume numerical methods with staggered and colocated grids,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 389–403, 1988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. R. Swaminathan and V. R. Voller, “Streamline upwind scheme for control-volume finite elements, part I. Formulations,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part B: Fundam., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 95–107, 1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. R. Swaminathan and V. R. Voller, “Streamline upwind scheme for control-volume finite elements, part II. Implementation and comparison with the SUPG finite-element scheme,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part B: Fundam., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 109–124, 1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Pan and C.-H. Chang, “Upwind finite-volume method for natural and forced convection,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part B: Fundam., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 177–191, 1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Masson, H. J. Saabas, and B. R. Baliga, “Co-located equal-order control-volume finite element method for two-dimensional axisymmetric incompressible fluid flow,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. H. Chiu, T. W. H. Sheu, and R. K. Lin, “Development of a dispersion relation-preserving upwinding scheme for incompressible navier–stokes equations on NonStaggered grids,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part B: Fundam., vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 543–569, 2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. E. Schneider and S. M. H. Karimian, “Advances in control-volume-based finite-element methods for compressible flows,” Comput. Mech., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 431–446, 1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Darbandi and G. E. Schneider, “Analogy-based method for solving compressible and incompressible flows,” J. Thermophys. Heat Transf., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 239–247, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Darbandi and S. M. Bostandoost, “A new formulation toward unifying the velocity role in collocated variable arrangement,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part B: Fundam., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 361–382, 2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Darbandi and A. Naderi, “Multiblock hybrid grid finite volume method to solve flow in irregular geometries,” Computer Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 196, no. 1-3, pp. 321–336, 2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Darbandi and S. Vakilipour, “Developing implicit pressure-weighted upwinding scheme to calculate steady and unsteady flows on unstructured grids,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 115–141, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Naderi, M. Darbandi, and M. Taeibi-Rahni, “Developing a unified FVE-ALE approach to solve unsteady fluid flow with moving boundaries,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, vol. 63, pp. 40–68, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Hanafizadeh, M. H. Saidi, M. Darbandi, and A. Kebriaee, “Numerical simulation of two-phase flow in airlift pumps using the physical influence scheme,” Prog. Comput. Fluid Dyn., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 186–194, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Alisadeghi and S. M. H. Karimian, “Different modelings of cell-face velocities and their effects on the pressure-velocity coupling, accuracy and convergence of solution,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 969–988, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Alisadeghi and S. M. H. Karimian, “Comparison of different solution algorithms for collocated method of MCIM to calculate steady and unsteady incompressible flows on unstructured grids,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 94–100, 2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. S. V. Hurtado and C. R. Maliska, “A family of positive flow-weighted advection schemes for element-based finite-volume methods,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part B: Fundam., vol. 62, no. 2–3, pp. 113–140, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. O. B. Ogedengbe, K. L. Olaitan, and G. F. Naterer, “Tri-quadratic skew upwind scheme for scalar advection in a control-volume-based finite element method,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part B: Fundam., vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 485–505, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Darbandi and V. Mokarizadeh, “A modified pressure-based algorithm to solve flow fields with shock and expansion waves,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part B: Fundam., vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 497–504, 2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Darbandi and M. Ghafourizadeh, “A new bi-implicit finite volume element method for coupled systems of turbulent flow and aerosol-combustion dynamics,” J. Coupled Syst. Multis. Dyn., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 43–59, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Elkaim, M. Reggio, and R. Camarero, “Numerical solution of reactive laminar flow by a control-volume based finite-element method and the vorticity-streamfunction formulation,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part B: Fundam., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 223–240, 1991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Elkaim, M. Reggio, and R. Camarero, “Control volume finite-element solution of a confined turbulent diffusion flame,” Numer. Heat Transf. Part A: Appl., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 259–279, 1993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Darbandi, S. Vakili, and G. E. Schneider, “Efficient multilevel restriction-prolongation expressions for hybrid finite volume element method,” Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn., vol. 22, no. 1-2, pp. 29–38, 2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. B. Dally, A. R. Masri, R. S. Barlow, and G. J. Fiechtner, “Instantaneous and mean compositional structure of bluff-body stabilized nonpremixed flames,” Combust. Flame, vol. 114, no. 1-2, pp. 119–148, 1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.-K. Kim, S. Kang, and Y. Kim, “Eulerian particle flamelet modeling for combustion processes of bluff-body stabilized methanol-air turbulent nonpremixed flames,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol., vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1459–1474, 2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. P. V. Doormaal and G. D. Raithby, “Enhancements of the simple method for predicting incompressible fluid flows,” Numer. Heat Transf., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 147–163, 1984.
   Google Scholar