A three-field smoothed formulation for partitioned fluid–structure interaction via nonlinear block-Gauss–Seidel procedure

References

• C. Farhat, P. Geuzaine, and G. Brown, “Application of a three-field nonlinear fluid-structure formulation to the prediction of the aeroelastic parameters of an F-16 fighter,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 3–29, 2003. DOI:10.1016/S0045-7930(01)00104-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Stella et al., “A numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction in internal flows,” Numer. Heat Transf. B, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 403–418, 2005. DOI:10.1080/10407790590919180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. He, D. Zhou, and Y. Bao, “Combined interface boundary condition method for fluid-rigid body interaction,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 223, pp. 81–102, 2012. DOI:10.1016/j.cma.2012.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-Y. Tsui, Y.-C. Huang, C.-L. Huang, and S.-W. Lin, “A finite-volume-based approach for dynamic fluid-structure interaction,” Numer. Heat Transf. B, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 326–349, 2013. DOI:10.1080/10407790.2013.806691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. He, D. Zhou, Z. Han, J. Tu, and J. Ma, “Partitioned subiterative coupling schemes for aeroelasticity using combined interface boundary condition method,” Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn., vol. 28, no. 6–10, pp. 272–300, 2014. DOI:10.1080/10618562.2014.927057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. He and K. Zhang, “Combined interface boundary condition method for fluid-structure interaction: some improvements and extensions,” Ocean Eng., vol. 109, pp. 243–255, 2015. DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.08.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Cervera, R. Codina, and M. Galindo, “On the computational efficiency and implementation of block-iterative algorithms for nonlinear coupled problems,” Eng. Comput., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 4–30, 1996. DOI:10.1108/02644409610128382.
   Google Scholar
• C. Wood, A. J. Gil, O. Hassan, and J. Bonet, “Partitioned block-Gauss–Seidel coupling for dynamic fluid-structure interaction,” Comput. Struct., vol. 88, no. 23-24, pp. 1367–1382, 2010. DOI:10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Zeng and G. R. Liu, “Smoothed finite element methods (S-FEM): an overview and recent developments,” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 397–435, 2018. DOI:10.1007/s11831-016-9202-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. S. Chen, C. T. Wu, S. Yoon, and Y. You, “A stabilized conforming nodal integration for Galerkin mesh-free methods,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 435–466, 2001. DOI:10.1002/1097-0207(20010120)50:2 < 435::AID-NME32 > 3.0.CO;2-A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. W. Yoo, B. Moran, and J. S. Chen, “Stabilized conforming nodal integration in the natural-element method,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 861–890, 2004. DOI:10.1002/nme.972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z.-Q. Zhang, G. R. Liu, and B. C. Khoo, “Immersed smoothed finite element method for two dimensional fluid-structure interaction problems,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 1292–1320, 2012. DOI:10.1002/nme.4299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Wang, B. C. Khoo, G. R. Liu, G. X. Xu, and L. Chen, “Coupling GSM/ALE with ES-FEM-T3 for fluid-deformable structure interactions,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 276, pp. 315–340, 2014. DOI:10.1016/j.jcp.2014.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. He, “Semi-implicit coupling of CS-FEM and FEM for the interaction between a geometrically nonlinear solid and an incompressible fluid,” Int. J. Comput. Methods, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1550025, 2015. DOI:10.1142/S0219876215500255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. He, “A CBS-based partitioned semi-implicit coupling algorithm for fluid-structure interaction using MCIBC method,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng, vol. 298, pp. 252–278, 2016. DOI:10.1016/j.cma.2015.09.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. He, “Towards straightforward use of cell-based smoothed finite element method in fluid-structure interaction,” Ocean Eng, vol. 157, pp. 350–363, 2018. DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.03.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Kim and S. Im, “Polygonal type variable-node elements by means of the smoothed finite element method for analysis of two-dimensional fluid-solid interaction problems in viscous incompressible flows,” Comput. Struct., vol. 182, pp. 475–490, 2017. DOI:10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Jiang, Z. Q. Zhang, X. Han, G. R. Liu, and T. Lin, “A cell-based smoothed finite element method with semi-implicit CBS procedures for incompressible laminar viscous flows,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 20–45, 2018. DOI:10.1002/fld.4406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. R. Liu, K. Y. Dai, and T. T. Nguyen, “A smoothed finite element method for mechanics problems,” Comput. Mech., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 859–877, 2007. DOI:10.1007/s00466-006-0075-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Y. Dai and G. R. Liu, “Free and forced vibration analysis using the smoothed finite element method (SFEM),” J. Sound Vib., vol. 301, no. 3–5, pp. 803–820, 2007. DOI:10.1016/j.jsv.2006.10.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Y. Cui et al., “A smoothed finite element method (SFEM) for linear and geometrically nonlinear analysis of plates and shells,” Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 109–126, 2008. DOI:10.3970/cmes.2008.028.109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. W. Hirt, A. A. Amsden, and J. L. Cook, “An arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 227–253, 1974. DOI:10.1016/0021-9991(74)90051-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Nithiarasu, R. Codina, and O. C. Zienkiewicz, “The Characteristic-Based Split (CBS) scheme—a unified approach to fluid dynamics,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 1514–1546, 2006. DOI:10.1002/nme.1698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.-J. Bathe, E. Ramm, and E. L. Wilson, “Finite element formulations for large deformation dynamic analysis,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 353–386, 1975. DOI:10.1002/nme.1620090207.
   Google Scholar
• A. L. Braun and A. M. Awruch, “A partitioned model for fluid-structure interaction problems using hexahedral finite elements with one-point quadrature,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 505–549, 2009. DOI:10.1002/nme.2566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Chung and G. M. Hulbert, “A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: the generalized-method,” J. Appl. Mech., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 371–375, 1993. DOI:10.1115/1.2900803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Kuhl and M. A. Crisfield, “Energy-conserving and decaying algorithms in non-linear structural dynamics,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 569–599, 1999. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5 < 569::AID-NME595 > 3.0.CO;2-A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. M. Newmark, “A method of computation for structural dynamics,” J. Eng. Mech. ASCE, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 67–94, 1959.
   Google Scholar
• W. Dettmer and D. Peric, “A computational framework for fluid-structure interaction: finite element formulation and applications,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 195, no. 41–43, pp. 5754–5779, 2006. DOI:10.1016/j.cma.2005.10.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Lefrancois, “A simple mesh deformation technique for fluid-structure interaction based on a submesh approach,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 75, no. no. 9, pp. 1085–1101, 2008. DOI:10.1002/nme.2284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. A. Markou, Z. S. Mouroutis, D. C. Charmpis, and M. Papadrakakis, “The ortho-semi-torsional (OST) spring analogy method for 3D mesh moving boundary problems,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 196, no. 4–6, pp. 747–765, 2007. DOI:10.1016/j.cma.2006.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. He, T. Wang, and H. Zhang, “The use of artificial compressibility to improve partitioned semi-implicit FSI coupling within the classical Chorin-Temam projection framework,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 166, pp. 64–77, 2018. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.01.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Souli, A. Ouahsine, and L. Lewin, “ALE formulation for fluid-structure interaction problems,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 190, no. 5–7, pp. 659–675, 2000. DOI:10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00432-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. P. Mok and W. A.Wall, “Partitioned analysis schemes for the transient interaction of incompressible flows and nonlinear flexible structures,” in Trends in Computational Structural Mechanics, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 689–698, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• T. Yamada and S. Yoshimura, “Line search partitioned approach for fluid-structure interaction analysis of flapping wing,” Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 51–60, 2008. DOI:10.3970/cmes.2008.024.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Piperno, “Explicit/implicit fluid/structure staggered procedures with a structural predictor and fluid subcycling for 2D inviscid aeroelastic simulations,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 1207–1226, 1997. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19971130)25:10 < 1207::AID-FLD616 > 3.0.CO;2-R.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. A. Wall and E. Ramm, “Fluid-structure interaction based upon a stabilized (ALE) finite element method,” in Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Computational Mechanics: New Trends and Applications, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 1–20, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• B. Hubner, E. Walhorn, and D. Dinkier, “Strongly coupled analysis of fluid-structure interaction using space-time finite elements,” in Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Computational Mechanics, Cracow, Poland, pp. 546–547, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• H. G. Matthies and J. Steindorf, “Partitioned strong coupling algorithms for fluid-structure interaction,” Comput. Struct., vol. 81, no. 8–11, pp. 805–812, 2003. DOI:10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00409-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. R. F. Teixeira and A. M. Awruch, “Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction using the finite element method,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 249–273, 2005. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2004.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. M. Liew, W. Q. Wang, L. X. Zhang, and X. Q. He, “A computational approach for predicting the hydroelasticity of flexible structures based on the pressure Poisson equation,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 72, no. 13, pp. 1560–1583, 2007. DOI:10.1002/nme.2120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Bazilevs, V. M. Calo, T. J. R. Hughes, and Y. Zhang, “Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations,” Comput. Mech., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 3–37, 2008. DOI:10.1007/s00466-008-0315-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Olivier, G. Dumas, and J. Morissette, “A fluid-structure interaction solver for nano-air-vehicle flapping wings,” in Proceedings of the 19th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, San Antonio, Texas, USA, pp. 1–15, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• C. Kassiotis, A. Ibrahimbegovic, R. Niekamp, and H. G. Matthies, “Nonlinear fluid-structure interaction problem. Part I: implicit partitioned algorithm, nonlinear stability proof and validation examples,” Comput. Mech., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 305–323, 2011. DOI:10.1007/s00466-010-0545-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Habchi et al., “Partitioned solver for strongly coupled fluid-structure interaction,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 71, pp. 306–319, 2013. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. De Rosis, G. Falcucci, S. Ubertini, and F. Ubertini, “A coupled lattice Boltzmann-finite element approach for two-dimensional fluid-structure interaction,” Comput. Fluids, vol. 86, pp. 558–568, 2013. DOI:10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Froehle and P. O. Persson, “A high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for fluid-structure interaction with efficient implicit-explicit time stepping,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 272, no. 9, pp. 455–470, 2014. DOI:10.1016/j.jcp.2014.03.034.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kaneko, G. Hong, N. Mitsume, T. Yamada, and S. Yoshimura, “Partitioned-coupling FSI analysis with active control,” Comput. Mech., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 549–558, 2017. DOI:10.1007/s00466-017-1422-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar