Keller-Box shooting method and its application to nanofluid flow over convectively heated sheet with stability and convergence

References

• K. A. Maleque, “Effects of exothermic/endothermic chemical reactions with arrhenius activation energy on MHD free convection and mass transfer flow in presence of thermal radiation,” J. Thermodynam., vol. 2013, pp. Article ID 692516, 2013. DOI: 10.1155/2013/692516.
   Google Scholar
• P. R. Nachtsheim, and P. Swigert, “Satisfaction of asymptotic boundary conditions in numerical solution of system of nonlinear of boundary layer type,” NASA TN-D3004, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• M. Z. Swalmeh, H. T. Alkasasbeh, A. Hussanan, and M. Mamat, “Heat transfer flow of Cu-water and Al2O3-water micropolar nanofluids about a solid sphere in the presence of natural convection using Keller-Box method,” Result Phys., vol. 9, pp. 717–724, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.03.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Mustafa, J. Ahmad Khan, T. Hayat, and A. Alsaedi, “Analytical and numerical solutions for axisymmetric flow of nanofluid due to non-linearly stretching sheet,” Int. J. Nonlin. Mech., vol. 71, pp. 22–29, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2015.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Mahanthesh, B. J. Gireesha, and R. S. R. Gorla, “Unsteady three-dimensional MHD flow of a nano Eyring-Powell fluid past a convectively heated stretching sheet in the presence of thermal radiation, viscous dissipation and Joule heating,” J. Assoc. Arab Univ. Basic Appl. Sci., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaubas.2016.05.004.
   Google Scholar
• T. Hayat, Y. Saeed, S. Asad, and A. Alsaedi, “Convective heat and mass transfer in flow by an inclined stretching cylinder,” J. Mol. Liquid., vol. 220, pp. 573–580, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.03.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Hayat, S. Qayyum, and A. Alsaedi, “Mechanisms of nonlinear convective flow of Jeffrey nanofluid due to nonlinear radially stretching sheet with convective conditions and magnetic field,” Result Phys., vol. 7, pp. 2341–2351, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.06.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mushtaq, and M. Mustafa, “Computations for nanofluid flow near a stretchable rotating disk with axial magnetic field and convective conditions,” Result Phys., vol. 7, pp. 3137–3144, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.08.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. M. Rashidi, T. Hayat, E. Erfani, S. A. Mohimanian Pour, and A. A. Hendi, “Simultaneous effects of partial slip and thermal-diffusion and diffusion-thermo on steady MHD convective flow due to a rotating disk,” Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 4303–4317, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Mustafa, and J. A. Khan, “Numerical study of partial slip effects on MHD flow of nanofluids near a convectively heated stretchable rotating disk,” J. Mol. Liquid., vol. 234, pp. 287–295, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.03.087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. I. Khan, S. Qayyum, T. Hayat, M. I. Khan, A. Alsaedi, and T. A. Khan, “Entropy generation in radiative motion of tangent hyperbolic nanofluid in presence of activation energy and nonlinear mixed convection,” Phys. Lett. A., vol. 382, no. 31, pp. 2017–2026, Aug. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2018.05.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Dhlamini, P. K. Kameswaran, P. Sibanda, S. Motsa, and H. Mondal, “Activation energy and binary chemical reaction effects in mixed convective nanofluid flow with convective boundary conditions,” J. Comput. Design Eng., vol. 6 no. 2, pp. 149–158, 2019, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcde.2018.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Kumar, S. Sood, M. Sheikholeslami, and S. A. Shehzad, “Nonlinear thermal radiation and cubic autocatalysis chemical reaction effects on the flow of stretched nanofluid under rotational oscillations,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., vol. 505, pp. 253–265, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.05.083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Urena, L. Gavete, A. Garcia, J. J. Benito, and A. M. Vargas, “Solving second order non-linear parabolic PDEs using generalized finite difference method (GFDM),” J. Comput. Appl. Math., vol. 354, pp. 221–241, 2019, DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2018.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Cebeci, and P. Bradshaw, Physical and Computational Aspects of Convective Heat Transfer. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Kun, W. Liangbi, and Z. Yuwen, “Improved finite difference method with a compact correction term for solving Poisson’s equations,” Num. Heat Transf. B., vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 393–405, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/10407790.2016.1215715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Shuying, and F. Xinlong, “A block-centered finite-difference method for time-fractional diffusion equation on nonuniform Grids,” Num. Heat Transf. B., vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 217–233, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/10407790.2015.1097101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Zeka, “A novel fully implicit block coupled solution strategy for the ultimate treatment of the velocity–pressure coupling problem in incompressible fluid flow,” Num. Heat Transf. B., vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 130–149, 2016. DOI: 10.1080/10407790.2015.1093787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Turkyilmazoglu, and P. Senel, “Heat and mass transfer of the flow due to a rotating rough and porous disk,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., vol. 63, pp. 146–158, 2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kamran, and B. Wiwatanapataphee, “Chemical reaction and Newtonian heating effects on steady convection flow of a micropolar fluid with second order slip at the boundary,” Eur. J. Mech. B Fluid., vol. 71, pp. 138–150, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2018.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar