Verification and validation of a variable–density solver for fire safety applications

References

• A. Shabbir and W. K. George, “Experiments on a round turbulent buoyant plume,” J. Fluid Mech, vol. 275, pp. 1–32, 1994. DOI:10.1017/S0022112094002260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. M. Cetegan and T. A. Ahmed, “Experiments on the periodic instability of buoyant plumes and pool fires,” Combust. Flame, vol. 93, pp. 157–184, 1993. DOI:10.1016/0010-2180(93)90090-P.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. F. Ghoniem, I. Lakkis, and M. Soteriou, “Numerical simulation of the dynamics of large fire plumes and the phenomenon of puffing,” Proc. 26th Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1993. DOI:10.1016/S0082-0784(96)80375-4.
   Google Scholar
• B. M. Cetegen and K. D. Kasper, “Experiments on the oscillatory behavior of buoyant plumes of helium and helium-air mixtures,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 2974–2984, 1996. DOI:10.1063/1.869075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. E. DesJardin, T. J. O’Hern, and S. R. Tieszen, “Large eddy simulation and experimental measurements of the near-field of a large turbulent helium plume,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1866–1883, 2004. DOI:10.1063/1.1689371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. R. Tieszen, H. Pitsch, G. Blanquart, and S. Abarzhi, “Toward the development of a les-sgs closure model for buoyant plumes,” Proc. of the Summer Program, Center for Turbulence Research. Stanford, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• “Firefoam.” http://code.google.com/p/firefoam-dev.
   Google Scholar
• “Fire dynamics simulator.” http://fire.nist.gov/fds.
   Google Scholar
• A. C. Y. Yuen, G. H. Yeoh, V. Timchenko, and T. Barber, “Les and multi-step chemical reaction in compartment fires,” Numer. Heat Transf., A: Appl., vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 711–736, 2015. DOI:10.1080/10407782.2015.1012886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. C. Y. Yuen, G. H. Yeoh, V. Timchenko, S. C. P. Cheung, and T. Chen, “Study of three les subgrid-scale turbulence models for predictions of heat and mass transfer in large-scale compartment fires,” Numer. Heat Transf., A: Appl., vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 1223–1241, 2016. DOI:10.1080/10407782.2016.1139903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. L. Oberkampf and T. G. Trucano, “Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics,” Rev. Article Prog. Aero. Sci, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 209–272, 2002. DOI:10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00005-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Shunn, F. Ham, and P. Moin, “Verification of variable-density flow solvers using manufactured solutions,” J. Comput. Phys, vol. 231, no. 9, pp. 3801–3827, 2012. DOI:10.1016/j.jcp.2012.01.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Mullyadzhanov, E. Palkin, B. Nieno, L. Vervisch, and K. Hanjali, “Verification of a low mach variable-density navier-stokes solver for turbulent combustion,” J. Phys: Conf. Ser., vol. 754, pp. 062005, 2016. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/754/6/062005.
   Google Scholar
• T. J. O’Hern, E. J. Weckman, A. L. Gerhart, S. R. Tieszen, and R. W. Schefer, “Experimental study of a turbulent buoyant helium plume,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 544, pp. 143–171, 2005. DOI:10.1017/S0022112005006567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Blanquart and H. Pitsch, “Large-eddy simulation of a turbulent buoyant helium plume,” in Annual Research Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, Ed., 2008, pp. 245–252.
   Google Scholar
• A. Brown et al., “Proceedings of the first workshop organized by the iafss working group on measurement and computation of fire phenomena (macfp),” Fire Safety J, vol. 101, pp. 1–17, 2018. DOI:10.1016/j.firesaf.2018.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Chung and C. B. Devaud, “Buoyancy corrected k−ϵ models and large eddy simulation applied to a large axisymmetric helium plume,” Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, vol. 58, pp. 57–89, 2008. DOI:10.1002/fld.1720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Maragkos, P. Rauwoens, Y. Wang, and B. Merci, “Large eddy simulations of the flow in the near-field region of a turbulent buoyant helium plume,” Flow Turbulence Combust, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 511–543, 2013. DOI:10.1007/s10494-012-9437-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Code_Saturne.” http://www.code-saturne.org.
   Google Scholar
• B. C. Wang, E. Yee, D. J. Bergstrom, and O. Iida, “New dynamic subgrid-scale heat flux models for large-eddy simulation of thermal convection based on the general gradient diffusion hypothesis,” J. Fluid Mech, vol. 604, pp. 125–163, 2008. DOI:10.1017/S0022112008001079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Fabre and G. Balarac, “Development of a new dynamic procedure for the clark model of the subgrid-scale scalar flux using the concept of optimal estimator,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 115103, 2011. DOI:10.1063/1.3657090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Peng and L. Davidson, “On a subgrid-scale heat flux model for large eddy simulation of turbulent thermal flow,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1393–1405, 2002. DOI:10.1016/S0017-9310(01)00254-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. W. Higgins, M. B. Parlange, and C. Meneveau, “The heat flux and the temperature gradient in the lower atmosphere,” Geophys. Res. Lett, vol. 31, no. 22, pp. 1–5, 2004. DOI:10.1029/2004GL020053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. C. Wang, E. Yee, J. Yin, and D. J. Bergstrom, “A general dynamic linear tensor-diffusivity subgrid-scale heat flux model for large-eddy simulation of turbulent thermal flows,” Numer. Heat Tr. B, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 205–227, 2007. DOI:10.1080/10407790601102274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. C. Wang, E. Yee, J. Yin, and D. J. Bergstrom, “A complete and irreducible dynamic sgs heat-flux modelling based on the strain rate tensor for large-eddy simulation of thermal convection,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1227–1243, 2007. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2007.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Moin, K. Squires, W. Cabot, and S. Lee, “A dynamic subgrid-scale model for compressible turbulence and scalar transport,” Phys. Fluids A, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 2746–2757, 1991. DOI:10.1063/1.858164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Pierce and P. Moin, “Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 504, pp. 73–97, 2004. DOI:10.1017/S0022112004008213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. K. Lilly, “A proposed modification of the germano subgrid-scale closure method,” Phys. Fluids A, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 633–635, 1992. DOI:10.1063/1.858280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. J. Daly and F. H. Harlow, “Transport equations in turbulence,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 2634–2649, 1970. DOI:10.1063/1.1692845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. W. Bedford and W. K. Yeo, “Conjective filtering procedures in surface water flow and transport,” in Large Eddy Simulation of Complex Engineering and Geophysical Flows. B. Galperin and S. A. Orszag, Eds. Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 523–537.
   Google Scholar
• B. Vreman, B. Geurts, and H. Kuerten, “On the formulation of the dynamic mixed subgrid scale model,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 4057, 1994. DOI:10.1063/1.868333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Lu, and F. Port-Agel, “A modulated gradient model for scalar transport in large-eddy simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 25, no. 015220, 2013. DOI:10.1063/1.4774342.
   Google Scholar
• B. Vreman, B. Geurts, and H. Kuerten, “Large-eddy simulation of the turbulent mixing layer,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 339, pp. 357–390, 1997. DOI:10.1017/S0022112097005429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar