A high-order finite volume scheme for unsteady convection-dominated convection–diffusion equations

References

• J. C. Wu, L. T. Fan, and L. E. Erickson, “Three-point backward finite-difference method for solving a system of mixed hyperbolic-parabolic partial differential equations,” Comp. Chem. Eng., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 679, 1990. DOI: 10.1016/0098-1354(90)87036-O.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Q. Tao et al., “Some recent advances in finite volume approach and their applications in the study of heat transfer enhancement,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 623–643, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2005.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. K. Versteeg, and W. Malalasekera, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics. The Finite Volume Method, 2nd ed. London: Prentice Hall, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• P. Tamamidis, and D. N. Assanis, “Evaluation of various high-order-accuracy schemes with and without flux limiters,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 931–948, 1993. DOI: 10.1002/fld.1650161006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. J. Chen et al., “A meshless local Petrov-Galerkin approach for solving the convection-dominated problems based on the streamline upwind idea and the variational multiscale concept,” Numer. Heat Transfer B Fundam., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 19–32, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/10407790.2017.1420320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. J. Chen, Z. Y. Li, and W. Q. Tao, “A new stability parameter in streamline upwind meshless Petrov-Galerkin method for convection-diffusion problems at large Peclet number,” Numer. Heat Transfer B Fundam., vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 746–764, 2018. DOI: 10.1080/10407790.2019.1580050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. You, Z. Y. Li, and W. Q. Tao, “A physically consistent FVM interpolation scheme based on the discretized convection-diffusion equation,” Numer. Heat Transfer B Fundam., vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 443–455, 2017. DOI: 10.1080/10407790.2017.1309174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Harten, “High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws,” Comput. Phys., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 357–393, 1983. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(83)90136-5.
   Google Scholar
• P. K. Sweby, “High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 995–1011, 1984. DOI: 10.1137/0721062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. L. Roe, “Characteristic-based schemes for the Euler equations,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 337–365, 1986. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.18.1.337.
   Google Scholar
• B. van Leer, “Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second-order scheme,” Comput. Phys., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 361–370, 1974. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(74)90019-9.
   Google Scholar
• D. Zhang et al., “A review on TVD schemes and a refined flux-limiter for steady-state calculations,” Comput. Phys., vol. 302, pp. 114–154, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.08.042.
   Google Scholar
• S. Osher, and E. Tadmor, “On the convergence of difference approximations to scalar conservation laws,” Math. Comput., vol. 50, no. 181, pp. 19–51, 1988. DOI: 10.2307/2007913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Harten et al., “Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes III,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 231–303, 1987. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(87)90031-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Harten, and S. Osher, “Uniformly high-order accurate nonoscillatory schemes I,” SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 279–309, 1987. DOI: 10.1137/0724022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. W. Shu, and S. Osher, “Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 439–471, 1988. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. W. Shu, and S. Osher, “Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes II,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 32–78, 1989. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(89)90222-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. D. Liu, S. Osher, and T. Chan, “Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 200–212, 1994. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1994.1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. S. Jiang, and C. W. Shu, “Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 202–228, 1996. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1996.0130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. S. Balsara, and C.-W. Shu, “Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 160, no. 2, pp. 405–452, 2000. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Qiu, and C. W. Shu, “Hermite WENO schemes and their application as limiters for Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method: One-dimensional case,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 115–135, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2003.07.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. K. Henrick, T. D. Aslam, and J. M. Powers, “Mapped weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes: Achieving optimal order near critical points,” Comput. Phys., vol. 207, no. 2, pp. 542–567, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.01.023.
   Google Scholar
• H. Liu, and J. Qiu, “Finite difference Hermite WENO schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws,” J. Sci. Comput., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 548–572, 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s10915-014-9905-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Liu, and J. Qiu, “Finite difference Hermite WENO schemes for conservation laws, II: An alternative approach,” J. Sci. Comput., vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 598–624, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s10915-015-0041-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Ma, and S. P. Wu, “HWENO schemes based on compact difference for hyperbolic conservation laws,” J. Sci. Comput., vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 1301–1325, 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s10915-018-0663-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Augustin et al., “An assessment of discretizations for convection-dominated convection-diffusion equations,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 200, no. 47-48, pp. 3395–3409, 2011., DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2011.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Pan, “A high-order finite volume method for solving one-dimensional convection and diffusion equations,” Numer. Heat Transfer B Fundam., vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 533–548, 2017. DOI: 10.1080/10407790.2017.1326769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Liu, H. Fu, and P. Lu, “New shock detector and improved control function for shock-boundary layer interaction,” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 276–288, 2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Skála et al., “The 3D MHD code GOEMHD3 for astrophysical plasmas with large Reynolds numbers,” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 580, pp. A48, 2015., DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Xu, “A type of high order schemes for steady convection-diffusion problems,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 107, pp. 1044–1053, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.10.128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Xu, “A modified finite volume method for convection-diffusion-reaction problems,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, vol. 117, pp. 658–668, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Xu, “A high order scheme for unsteady heat conduction equations,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 348, pp. 565–574, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2018.12.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Cheng, and C. W. Shu, “Superconvergence of local discontinuous Galerkin methods for one-dimensional convection-diffusion equation,” Comput. Struct., vol. 87, no. 11–12, pp. 630–641, 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.11.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zhu, and J. Qiu, “Local DG method using WENO type limiters for convection-diffusion problems,” Comput. Phys., vol. 230, no. 11, pp. 4353–4375, 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.03.023.
   Google Scholar
• I. A. Ganaie, and V. K. Kukreja, “Numerical solution of Burgers’ equation by cubic Hermite collocation method,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 237, pp. 571–581, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2014.03.102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar